Financial requirement for last three years?

[corvusheart 163]

I read somewhere you have to have been making %125 percent of the financial requirement for the last Three years to qualify as a us sponsor. Is this true? I am over %125 of the requirement but have only had this job for a year.

[NikLR 13,236]

Current income counts more than past income. So as long as your current make more and even better if you have at least 1 year of tax return under your belt at that job.

[corvusheart 163]

Yes I have my tax return from last year that is way over %125 of the requirement and I still hold that same job and have been here for a year now. It's this topic that made me concerned:http://forums.immigration.com/showthread.php?174703-I-864-Income-requirement-for-last-three-years

[EndlessStory 53]

That post is 2005 and that's i-864 which will be used for AOS for K1 visa applicant. CR-1 applicant will be using I-864 earlier in their process

[corvusheart 163]

We are doing K-1 but once he gets here we will be doing AOS

[kitthekat 1,317]

I believe London only requires the most recent tax transcript for K1s so it really shouldn't even be an issue for you.

[Nich-Nick 3,355]

I believe London only requires the most recent tax transcript for K1s so it really shouldn't even be an issue for you.

London doesn't even require a transcript (or tax return) for a K1 if you provide other proof.

Edited February 15, 2014 by Nich-Nick

[corvusheart 163]

Talking about AOS after marriage.

[corvusheart 163]

Anyone else know?

[Lemonslice 5,442]

Have you asked your lawyer?

[corvusheart 163]

Have you asked your lawyer?

Yes they said all that matters is I meet the requirement now.

[Ketsuban 1,035]

Yes they said all that matters is I meet the requirement now.

Then there you go

We're doing CR-1 and my husband has had his job since July 2012. He definitely does not meet any "3 year" requirement, but currently makes more than enough for the both of us. We anticipate no issues.

[corvusheart 163]

Then there you go

We're doing CR-1 and my husband has had his job since July 2012. He definitely does not meet any "3 year" requirement, but currently makes more than enough for the both of us. We anticipate no issues.

Guess people on that link were just talking #######. Because lawyer said he'd never heard of a rule like that before.

Edited February 16, 2014 by corvusheart

[lost_at_sea 995]

Guess people on that link were just talking #######. Because lawyer said he'd never heard of a rule like that before.

If you read the thread, it actually says the same thing. Someone even quotes the rules on the matter, confirming current salary is most important (5th response).

[corvusheart 163]

If you read the thread, it actually says the same thing. Someone even quotes the rules on the matter, confirming current salary is most important (5th response).

Ok thanks. Looks like my 2013 W-2, and paystubs will be enough to prove I make enough to financially support. As I am very much over %125.

Edited February 16, 2014 by corvusheart