Juror: Zimmerman Got Away with Murder

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

http://abcnews.go.com/US/george-zimmerman-juror-murder/story?id=19770659

Of course this rules out the theory of a rigged jury and racism.

The jurors followed the rule of law. It is time that others do also. If you do not like the law, change it.

Edited July 25, 2013 by Gary and Alla

[Teddy B 17,252]

From the story:

However, on the second day of deliberations, after spending nine hours discussing the evidence, Maddy said she realized there wasn't enough proof to convict Zimmerman of murder or manslaughter under Florida law.

Zimmerman concedes he shot and killed Martin in Sanford on Feb. 26, 2012, but maintains he fired in self-defense.

"That's where I felt confused, where if a person kills someone, then you get charged for it," Maddy said. "But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can't say he's guilty."

This woman is very confused. If there is not enough evidence or proof to convict someone of murder, then how can you possibly say that person got away with murder? What BS.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

Posting a link without actually posting any content from the story is silly. It's like taking a dump in the middle of the floor and expecting everyone else to deal with it.

[DaveE 178]

I read that article a little while ago. Pretty impressive lady.

Many on other web sites I visit were saying that a six woman jury could not put away emotion and that GZ was screwed. Hung jury at best.

This lady is saying that is exactly what they did.

"You can't put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty," said the woman who was identified only as Juror B29 during the trial. "But we had to grab our hearts and put it aside and look at the evidence."

Telling also is what else she said:

When asked by Roberts whether the case should have gone to trial, Maddy said, "I don't think so."

"I felt like this was a publicity stunt. This whole court service thing to me was publicity," she said.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

If you do not like the law, change it.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

"

That's where I felt confused, where if a person kills someone, then you get charged for it," Maddy said. "But as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can't say he's guilty."

This woman is very confused. If there is not enough evidence or proof to convict someone of murder, then how can you possibly say that person got away with murder? What BS.

That is why they had the manslaughter instruction. Stupid jurors.

Posting a link without actually posting any content from the story is silly. It's like taking a dump in the middle of the floor and expecting everyone else to deal with it.

Gary's copy and past skills are limited. I blame the Texas education system.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

Posting a link without actually posting any content from the story is silly. It's like taking a dump in the middle of the floor and expecting everyone else to deal with it.

Penny, it is a VIDEO so you do not have to read...OK!? I thought about that. #######!

That is why they had the manslaughter instruction. Stupid jurors.

Gary's copy and past skills are limited. I blame the Texas education system.

It is a video, Bill.

Bill....IT IS A VIDEO! I know a lot of people cannot be troubled to read so I made the effort to make it easy for them and...nm.

[decocker 7,198]

Penny, it is a VIDEO so you do not have to read...OK!? I thought about that. #######!

It is a video, Bill.

Bill....IT IS A VIDEO! I know a lot of people cannot be troubled to read so I made the effort to make it easy for them and...nm.

it is not just a video. there's an article underneath.

[Penny Lane 8,159]

You could at least embed the video in the post.

All that awesome vacationing has made you lazy.

it is not just a video. there's an article underneath.

Quite a long one, too.

[Karee 4,190]

You could at least embed the video in the post.

All that awesome vacationing has made you lazy.

[Dan and Judy 614]

. It's like taking a dump in the middle of the floor and expecting everyone else to deal with it.

Oh sorry about that.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

I read that article a little while ago. Pretty impressive lady.

Many on other web sites I visit were saying that a six woman jury could not put away emotion and that GZ was screwed. Hung jury at best.

This lady is saying that is exactly what they did.

"You can't put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty," said the woman who was identified only as Juror B29 during the trial. "But we had to grab our hearts and put it aside and look at the evidence."

Telling also is what else she said:

When asked by Roberts whether the case should have gone to trial, Maddy said, "I don't think so."

"I felt like this was a publicity stunt. This whole court service thing to me was publicity," she said.

Where have we heard this before?

Y'all are gonna have to do what I did...grab your hearts and put them aside and follow the law. That is what the jurors did.

Th eTM worshippers here were all saying the same thing about a 6 woman jury. Most of them are women haters that do not give women credit for being able to think with their brains. I wasn't worried. I never even blinked. The evidence was obviously no tgood enough or they would have charged him outright and would have used a Grand Jury to indict. It was patently clear this was a puppet show from day one.

Manslaughter? Their evidence was nothing but "reasonable doubt". They could not have convicted him of jaywalking!

I nealry lost it when they came up with "child abuse" AFTER the trial was concluded...yet some idiots thought they would still get a conviction for murder or manslaughter?

How is it possible to even get one's head that far up one's @ss?

[Penny Lane 8,159]

At least this puts to rest the "the jury believed Zimmerman's innocence and that's why they came back with not guilty" nonsense that some people around here believe.

[Darnell 8,478]

Thanks for the video link, O Gary.

[Gary and Alla 3,694]

it is not just a video. there's an article underneath.

OMG!!!!!!!!!! OH NOes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! So it is a really big dump!

You have to watch AND read!

Y'know, here is a video AND an article that explodes the myth of racism skewing the jury, when the MINORITY on the jury says "she just had to follow the law" and put aside her heart...and the sour grapes bunch b*tch about not having the evidence that they are full of...dump...served to them on a silver platter. Such wonderful contributions to the discussion. Poignant, moving and profound

Next we can discuss my avatar

Maybe a misspelling?