Jump to content

47 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
http://news.yahoo.com/graduates-accuse-law-schools-scamming-students-021529890.html

Graduates accuse law schools of scamming students

By Jessica Dye. Edited by Peter Bohan | Reuters – 2 hrs 59 mins ago

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Facing a stagnant job market, law graduates from New York and Michigan schools on Wednesday accused their alma maters of duping graduates out of hundreds of thousands of dollars in tuition by publishing misleading post-graduation employment and salary statistics.

The two class-action suits were filed by graduates of New York Law School in lower Manhattan and Thomas M. Cooley Law School in Lansing, Michigan, amid growing scrutiny over whether law schools across the country are deliberately concealing the truth about their graduates' employment and salary in order to enroll more students despite their dismal job prospects.

Among the tactics allegedly employed by the schools were misclassifying graduates with temporary or part-time jobs as "fully" employed, omitting information about graduates who didn't respond to employment surveys, and creating post-graduate job programs to hire their own graduates.

"The law school industry today is much like a game of three-card monte, with law schools flipping over ace after ace, while a phalanx of non-suspecting players wager mostly borrowed money based on asymmetrical information on a game few of them can win," according to the New York lawsuit.

"These claims are without merit," Richard Matasar, the dean and president of New York Law School, said in a statement.

James Thelan, the associate dean for legal affairs and general counsel at Thomas Cooley, called the claims baseless.

'STATISTICS DELIBERATELY FUDGED'

According to the suits, both schools enroll large classes each year and charge around $100,000 for a law degree. While both boast employment rates of 80 percent or better within 9 months of graduation, those statistics are deliberately fudged to make it seem like all of the jobs are in the legal field, plaintiffs said.

"We are bringing these lawsuits because thousands of young lawyers, like the plaintiffs, struggle to purchase a home, raise a family and make investments because they leveraged their future to a law school based on inaccurate information," said Jesse Strauss, a partner at Kurzon Strauss representing the plaintiffs. "It is time for the legal academy to own up to this problem."

The Cooley plaintiffs are seeking $250 million in damages and the New York Law School graduates are asking for $200 million in tuition refunds for a proposed class of recent graduates. Both suits are asking a court to force the schools to be more transparent in how they report post-graduate job and salary information.

But if they want their money back, the students may face an uphill battle.

They would have to prove the school intentionally misled them, according to Larry Ribstein, associate dean of research at the University of Illinois School of Law.

The court also may inquire whether the students' understanding of their post-graduation chances of obtaining a job in the legal field was the deciding factor to attend the school, Ribstein said.

"There are a lot of questions about when a lie, or failure to disclose everything a customer might want to know, sinks to the level of being a lie, or rises to the level of triggering a fraud action," Ribstein said.

"Whether law schools have some responsibility to disclose the information -- that's a separate issue," he said.

The New York and Michigan law-school graduates aren't the first to take their schools to task for allegedly breaking promises. In May, a similar lawsuit was filed by graduates of Thomas Jefferson School of Law in San Diego, demanding more transparent post-graduation data from their school.

In October, a third-year student at Boston College Law School posted an anonymous open letter to the school's dean offering to drop out in exchange for a tuition refund.

Earlier this year, Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, and Sen. Charles Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, each wrote to the president of the American Bar Association, asking the organization to increase its scrutiny of law schools across the country.

On Monday, the American Bar Association's 566-member House of Delegates adopted two resolutions related to legal education. The first is designed to help graduates better manage the average $100,000 debt they accumulate at school. The second encourages law schools to report employment data in a way that more accurately reflects how many graduates find law-related jobs.

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

Cooley is a meat market. It has a nasty reputation of grinding up people, most transfer out after the first term if they can.

IR5

2007-07-27 – Case complete at NVC waiting on the world or at least MTL.

2007-12-19 - INTERVIEW AT MTL, SPLIT DECISION.

2007-12-24-Mom's I-551 arrives, Pop's still in purgatory (AP)

2008-03-11-AP all done, Pop is approved!!!!

tumblr_lme0c1CoS21qe0eclo1_r6_500.gif

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

I can't believe BC is in the mix. :help: :help: :help:

IR5

2007-07-27 – Case complete at NVC waiting on the world or at least MTL.

2007-12-19 - INTERVIEW AT MTL, SPLIT DECISION.

2007-12-24-Mom's I-551 arrives, Pop's still in purgatory (AP)

2008-03-11-AP all done, Pop is approved!!!!

tumblr_lme0c1CoS21qe0eclo1_r6_500.gif

Posted

I'm curious as to how this law suit plays out. Will they settle out of court or drag it on until the plaintiffs give up.

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Excuse the all-caps, si man:

THE COLLEGE GRADUATE WITH A SCIENCE DEGREE ASKS, "WHY DOES IT WORK?"

THE GRADUATE WITH AN ENGINEERING DEGREE ASKS, "HOW DOES IT WORK?"

THE GRADUATE WITH AN ECONOMICS DEGREE ASKS, "HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?"

THE GRADUATE WITH A LIBERAL-ARTS DEGREE ASKS, "WOULD YOU LIKE FRIES WITH THAT?"

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

Excuse the all-caps, si man:

THE COLLEGE GRADUATE WITH A SCIENCE DEGREE ASKS, "WHY DOES IT WORK?"

THE GRADUATE WITH AN ENGINEERING DEGREE ASKS, "HOW DOES IT WORK?"

THE GRADUATE WITH AN ECONOMICS DEGREE ASKS, "HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?"

THE GRADUATE WITH A LIBERAL-ARTS DEGREE ASKS, "WOULD YOU LIKE FRIES WITH THAT?"

:lol:

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Excuse the all-caps, si man:

THE COLLEGE GRADUATE WITH A SCIENCE DEGREE ASKS, "WHY DOES IT WORK?"

THE GRADUATE WITH AN ENGINEERING DEGREE ASKS, "HOW DOES IT WORK?"

THE GRADUATE WITH AN ECONOMICS DEGREE ASKS, "HOW MUCH DOES IT COST?"

THE GRADUATE WITH A LIBERAL-ARTS DEGREE ASKS, "WOULD YOU LIKE FRIES WITH THAT?"

So true!!!!!:thumbs: :thumbs: :thumbs:

The advertisement just above this thread is from Cooley, can you believe that?:wacko: :wacko: :wacko:

Edited by IR5FORMUMSIE

IR5

2007-07-27 – Case complete at NVC waiting on the world or at least MTL.

2007-12-19 - INTERVIEW AT MTL, SPLIT DECISION.

2007-12-24-Mom's I-551 arrives, Pop's still in purgatory (AP)

2008-03-11-AP all done, Pop is approved!!!!

tumblr_lme0c1CoS21qe0eclo1_r6_500.gif

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Ireland
Timeline
Posted

They should gave gone to Chicago state. Free Goverment cheese and don't even have to attend class.

0.0 GPA over hundred students given Goverment grants.

I always did want to go back to school. Now I can get paid to not show up.

Don't have the link but it's easily found

“Nobody can go back and start a new beginning, but anyone can start today and make a new ending.”

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I don't think the students have really got a chance here. For one thing, it's not like they can give the law degree back. For another, I think it would be very difficult to prove that post-graduation employment data was the deciding factor that made you attend that school. And even if you do prove that, you have to prove that the data was deliberately misleading.

Also, why do a bunch of unemployed law grads need a law firm to represent them? You'd think they could work that out on their own. It seems this is proof that the students are just themselves worthless as they don't even chose to hire themselves.

Edited by SMR
Posted

Also, why do a bunch of unemployed law grads need a law firm to represent them? You'd think they could work that out on their own. It seems this is proof that the students are just themselves worthless as they don't even chose to hire themselves.

Pssst -- even lawyers need lawyers. When I got divorced from my ex, who was also a lawyer, we both hired attorneys even though the split was amicable. Why? Neither of us were specialists in family law. Although I think this case is going nowhere, since they got substantially what they contracted for when they signed their acceptance letters (i.e. a legal education), it would be foolish to do this pro se if they actually want to have any chance at making it go anywhere. They're baby lawyers and they don't know squat.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Posted

On another note, looking at the OP it looks like the BAR is cracking down on schools to post honest numbers as far as the job market is concerned.

sigbet.jpg

"I want to take this opportunity to mention how thankful I am for an Obama re-election. The choice was clear. We cannot live in a country that treats homosexuals and women as second class citizens. Homosexuals deserve all of the rights and benefits of marriage that heterosexuals receive. Women deserve to be treated with respect and their salaries should not depend on their gender, but their quality of work. I am also thankful that the great, progressive state of California once again voted for the correct President. America is moving forward, and the direction is a positive one."

Posted

On another note, looking at the OP it looks like the BAR is cracking down on schools to post honest numbers as far as the job market is concerned.

It is a truth universally acknowledged that in lean times, people flock to law school. Sometimes this works out in terms of jobs at the end, sometimes not, and ultimately where you went for your JD is relevant to employers. Better disclosure will help prospective students make better choices.

larissa-lima-says-who-is-against-the-que

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted

It is a truth universally acknowledged that in lean times, people flock to law school. Sometimes this works out in terms of jobs at the end, sometimes not, and ultimately where you went for your JD is relevant to employers. Better disclosure will help prospective students make better choices.

Or they could just continue their careers as strippers.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...