Jump to content
Jolex

Pls i need your advice.

 Share

9 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline

Hi everyone, i'm writing this on behalf of a friend, her fiances was refused a K-1 visa and she was told to get in touch with her congressman which she did, but now she's been advice (by congressman/woman) to go back to her country to get married so she could file her papers again. pls just need an advice if this the move at this point in time. Pls ur advice is highly need so as to know what to do. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline

Hi everyone, i'm writing this on behalf of a friend, her fiances was refused a K-1 visa and she was told to get in touch with her congressman which she did, but now she's been advice (by congressman/woman) to go back to her country to get married so she could file her papers again. pls just need an advice if this the move at this point in time. Pls ur advice is highly need so as to know what to do. Thanks

Something doen't seem right to me. Why would a congressman/woman give such advise.Maybe your friend need a lawyer to help her sought out things. BTW is it not the same CO that will conduct the K-3 interview? So it is better to try and fix things from the onset than giving the enemies reason to celebrate temporarily. I am not at that stage yet but I am trying to imagine the chains of events. Goodluck

NSH

01/28/2010 - I-129F sent to VSC

01/30/2010 - USPS web site says I-129F packaged delivered to VSC

02/01/2010 - Date on NOA1

02/04/2010 - touched

02/06/2010 - Date NOA1 received in mail

7/12/10: Congress office called USCIS

7/13/10: Touch - Approaval Notice posted

7/14/10: NOA2 via email

7/16/2010: NVC Rec'd

7/17/2010: NOA2 Hard Copy Received

7/19/2010: NVC forwarded case to embassy

7/22/2010: Embassy Received

08/02/2010: Called DOS @(202-663-1225) and was given interview Date

11/19/2010: Interview

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline

Hi everyone, i am posting this on behalf of a friend. She had her fiancees K-1 visa refused, and she was told to get in touch with her congressman/woman which she did and she's now been advice to go back to her country to go and get married so she could refile her papers, pls i just want to know if this is the right decisoin, and is there any suggestion on what to do. Pls i need your advice. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

Hi everyone, i'm writing this on behalf of a friend, her fiances was refused a K-1 visa and she was told to get in touch with her congressman which she did, but now she's been advice (by congressman/woman) to go back to her country to get married so she could file her papers again. pls just need an advice if this the move at this point in time. Pls ur advice is highly need so as to know what to do. Thanks

This is not nearly enough information to give any sort of opinion. Visas are usually refused on one of two legal grounds; section 221(g) or section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationalization Act. Section 221(g) refers to applicants who haven't met the requirements to be issued a visa. This can usually be overcome by providing the missing documentation or evidence. Section 212(a) refers to applicants whom the consulate has determined have one or more inadmissibilities. Some inadmissibilities can be overcome by proving the consulate erred in concluding the inadmissibility exists. Some can be excused with a hardship waiver granted to the petitioner. Some cannot be excused under any circumstances.

Getting married only bypasses the general requirement that the petitioner cannot have two concurrent K visa petitions, and allows them to file a spousal visa petition before a final decision is made on the returned K1 petition. Getting married does not address the reason the first visa application was denied. Unless the reason is addressed, the second visa will also likely be denied.

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline

This is not nearly enough information to give any sort of opinion. Visas are usually refused on one of two legal grounds; section 221(g) or section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationalization Act. Section 221(g) refers to applicants who haven't met the requirements to be issued a visa. This can usually be overcome by providing the missing documentation or evidence. Section 212(a) refers to applicants whom the consulate has determined have one or more inadmissibilities. Some inadmissibilities can be overcome by proving the consulate erred in concluding the inadmissibility exists. Some can be excused with a hardship waiver granted to the petitioner. Some cannot be excused under any circumstances.

Getting married only bypasses the general requirement that the petitioner cannot have two concurrent K visa petitions, and allows them to file a spousal visa petition before a final decision is made on the returned K1 petition. Getting married does not address the reason the first visa application was denied. Unless the reason is addressed, the second visa will also likely be denied.

All true but often the additional visit and taking the trouble to get married coupled with a more careful and better prepared CR1 visa process, overcomes K1 denials that were based on lack of evidence of a bona fide relationship. It's no silver bullet but is a "tool" that when properly used, "fixes" certain "eligibility" issues.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline

All true but often the additional visit and taking the trouble to get married coupled with a more careful and better prepared CR1 visa process, overcomes K1 denials that were based on lack of evidence of a bona fide relationship. It's no silver bullet but is a "tool" that when properly used, "fixes" certain "eligibility" issues.

Yep, if the inadmissibility is a presumption of fraud - a sham relationship for the purpose of evading immigration law. On the other hand, if the inadmissibility was for a crime, then either a waiver is needed or the beneficiary may be permanently inadmissible, depending on which subsection of section 212(a) applied. All of that would be irrelevant if the denial was based on 221(g). Perhaps the applicant couldn't get a required police certificate or birth document or something else. Getting married wouldn't resolve that.

That's why I said more information was needed before an educated opinion could be given. The advice the OP's friend got from their congressman's office might be sound, or it could be completely off base. We won't know without more information.

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline

Yep, if the inadmissibility is a presumption of fraud - a sham relationship for the purpose of evading immigration law. On the other hand, if the inadmissibility was for a crime, then either a waiver is needed or the beneficiary may be permanently inadmissible, depending on which subsection of section 212(a) applied. All of that would be irrelevant if the denial was based on 221(g). Perhaps the applicant couldn't get a required police certificate or birth document or something else. Getting married wouldn't resolve that.

That's why I said more information was needed before an educated opinion could be given. The advice the OP's friend got from their congressman's office might be sound, or it could be completely off base. We won't know without more information.

I'm giving the Congressman's office the benefit of the doubt. I expect they had more information than we do before making such a recommendation.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Colombia
Timeline

they can get married and then apply for CR1 visa, it is common when the K1 visa is refused

We can all make a difference. Please recycle

por favor no escribas en mayúsculas sostenidas, eso equivale a GRITAR

crazy-cats.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline

duplicate threads merged. It is not necessary to post the same topic more than once.

“...Isn't it splendid to think of all the things there are to find out about? It just makes me feel glad to be alive--it's such an interesting world. It wouldn't be half so interesting if we knew all about everything, would it? There'd be no scope for imagination then, would there?”

. Lucy Maude Montgomery, Anne of Green Gables

5892822976_477b1a77f7_z.jpg

Another Member of the VJ Fluffy Kitty Posse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...