Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
justashooter

census will not ask about citizenship or legal status

11 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

"The Commerce Department and Census Bureau declared Tuesday that an amendment by Sen. David Vitter, R-La., to require the 2010 census to ask all persons their citizenship and immigration status would scuttle any chance that the census could be done on time and would cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.

U.S. Sen. David Vitter portrays his amendment as an attempt to keep Louisiana from losing one of its seven congressional districts in the coming reapportionment.The warning came even as the Senate Democratic leadership sought to head off a vote on the Vitter amendment to the Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill. An effort by the leadership to invoke cloture failed Tuesday evening, with the fight over whether to vote on the Vitter amendment, which he co-sponsored with Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, expected to resume today.

Vitter portrays his amendment as a last-ditch effort to protect the political power of Louisiana and other states with relatively small populations of people who are either not citizens or are not legal residents in the United States, and keep Louisiana from losing one of its seven congressional districts in the coming reapportionment.

The decennial census, required by the Constitution to count all "persons," is used for the purposes of congressional apportionment and legislative redistricting. The result is that places with more people -- regardless of their status -- get more representation.

Or as Vitter put it in floor debate on his amendment last week, "States that have large populations of illegals would be rewarded for that. Other states, including my home state of Louisiana, would be penalized."

Vitter said that in addition to Louisiana, the states of Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania and South Carolina "would lose out." He challenged the senators from those states, "if you vote against this amendment, then you are voting against the interests of your state."

By far the biggest winner under the existing system is California, followed by Texas, New York and Florida.

But opponents of the measure described it as ill-advised, and in its intent, both unconstitutional and discriminatory.

The Census Bureau, and the Commerce Department of which it is a part, said that 425 million of the 600 million census forms already had been printed, and that even adding an addenda sheet with the Vitter question also would require rewriting software code, reprogramming scanners and retraining census workers to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars."

So, since when did Team Obama worry about spending hundreds of millions of dollars?

They blew over a trillion dollars last year. Hundreds of millions is a drop in the bucket for these democrats.

Of course, this story will be buried by the state-run media.

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/10/...rkers-will.html


____________________________________________________________________________

obamasolyndrafleeced-lmao.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although it would be nice to be able to get accurate data as to the illegal immigrant population in this country, I think including the provision asking people's immigration status would only distort the numbers. Pure and simple, if you are asking people's immigration status, you will not get truthful results. Either people will lie, or more likely, they will simply not answer the questions. There is no enforcement mechanism to punish those who don't answer, or those who lie, so the whole thing is moot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Although it would be nice to be able to get accurate data as to the illegal immigrant population in this country, I think including the provision asking people's immigration status would only distort the numbers. Pure and simple, if you are asking people's immigration status, you will not get truthful results. Either people will lie, or more likely, they will simply not answer the questions. There is no enforcement mechanism to punish those who don't answer, or those who lie, so the whole thing is moot.

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.

The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.

I agree. The census is just supposed to be a headcount. With the passage of the 14th Amendment, there is no Constitutional reason even to differentiate whether a person is "free" or "slave".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Although it would be nice to be able to get accurate data as to the illegal immigrant population in this country, I think including the provision asking people's immigration status would only distort the numbers. Pure and simple, if you are asking people's immigration status, you will not get truthful results. Either people will lie, or more likely, they will simply not answer the questions. There is no enforcement mechanism to punish those who don't answer, or those who lie, so the whole thing is moot.

Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.

The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct.

I agree. The census is just supposed to be a headcount. With the passage of the 14th Amendment, there is no Constitutional reason even to differentiate whether a person is "free" or "slave".

As a Libertarian, I am instinctively uneasy about the prospect of the government prying into my private life by expanding the census. I do however think, that if they carefully limited it to demographic information it would be a good idea.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no enforcement mechanism to punish those who don't answer, or those who lie, so the whole thing is moot.

There are laws but how often are they enforced?

"The following section of the United States Code requires that people fill out their U.S. Census forms and provides a $100 penalty for not answering the Census and up to $500 for giving false information."

http://geography.about.com/library/misc/blusc13.htm


David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There is no enforcement mechanism to punish those who don't answer, or those who lie, so the whole thing is moot.

There are laws but how often are they enforced?

"The following section of the United States Code requires that people fill out their U.S. Census forms and provides a $100 penalty for not answering the Census and up to $500 for giving false information."

http://geography.about.com/library/misc/blusc13.htm

Like I said, there is no mechanism for enforcing it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×