It may be now-or-never to buy certain guns

[almaty 19]

Ammo is more expensive. Not buying an AR-15 but it seems to me that prices for just about every type have risen since Obama took office.

in many cases 2-3x the price a year ago.

of course. ammo suppliers distributors are nto socialists ..they raise the prices based on rumors and fears of the gun owners..

edit ^

thanks kind sir!

[The Dude 206]

Who gives a **.

I do. People can roll their eyes all they want but I will question the goverment be it republicans or democrats. I expect them to stay within the bounds of the costitution. Period.

Seems more people would want the same instead of being sheep.

The Constitution gives you the right to bear arms. It doesn't say what kind.

The FDA can limit what you eat and what drugs you take. DHS says who can live in this country and who cannot. Your DMV tells you what kind of vehicle is street legal and what kind is not.

I can't wrap my head around the logic that if it is manufactured and it has a trigger, it's constitutionally protected.

I feel the goverment has infringed into peoples lifes to much already. They just keep taking. As you stated above.

So a question for you. At what point will you as a "new age progressive" say enough is enough to the goverment? What will have to happen for you to say stop and to look at what is happening?

Im trying to find your logic.

You must be posting from your wilderness compound in the middle of Idaho

You are looking at the constitution far too literally.

[My Name Is Nobody 3]

Who gives a **.

I do. People can roll their eyes all they want but I will question the goverment be it republicans or democrats. I expect them to stay within the bounds of the costitution. Period.

Seems more people would want the same instead of being sheep.

The Constitution gives you the right to bear arms. It doesn't say what kind.

The FDA can limit what you eat and what drugs you take. DHS says who can live in this country and who cannot. Your DMV tells you what kind of vehicle is street legal and what kind is not.

I can't wrap my head around the logic that if it is manufactured and it has a trigger, it's constitutionally protected.

I feel the goverment has infringed into peoples lifes to much already. They just keep taking. As you stated above.

So a question for you. At what point will you as a "new age progressive" say enough is enough to the goverment? What will have to happen for you to say stop and to look at what is happening?

Im trying to find your logic.

You must be posting from your wilderness compound in the middle of Idaho

You are looking at the constitution far too literally.

Well study some history and educate yourself. You will find what happens to societies when they start handing all the power to the politicians I.E. become sheep.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Well we could go the other way, take all the power back and enjoy our newfound Mad Max utopia.

[NickD 203]

Who gives a **.

I do. People can roll their eyes all they want but I will question the goverment be it republicans or democrats. I expect them to stay within the bounds of the costitution. Period.

Seems more people would want the same instead of being sheep.

The Constitution gives you the right to bear arms. It doesn't say what kind.

The FDA can limit what you eat and what drugs you take. DHS says who can live in this country and who cannot. Your DMV tells you what kind of vehicle is street legal and what kind is not.

I can't wrap my head around the logic that if it is manufactured and it has a trigger, it's constitutionally protected.

I feel the goverment has infringed into peoples lifes to much already. They just keep taking. As you stated above.

So a question for you. At what point will you as a "new age progressive" say enough is enough to the goverment? What will have to happen for you to say stop and to look at what is happening?

Im trying to find your logic.

You must be posting from your wilderness compound in the middle of Idaho

You are looking at the constitution far too literally.

Appears that reading the bible or taking our laws literally is becoming old fashion. So if you can't read our laws literally are you suppose to take them illiterately? Feel only an illiterate person would suggest that or a crook.

[Joseph & Ana 0]

The left only likes to take the constitution literally (or just make stuff up from it - enter right to privacy) when it fits their plans. Right to assemble freely only applies to the left, freedom of speech only applies to the left, right to keep and bear arms only applied to a militia, etc. etc. They do like to twist the constitution. Talk about labels, they label anything that can hold 30 rounds or more as an assault rifle. They are full of it.

[The Dude 206]

Who gives a **.

I do. People can roll their eyes all they want but I will question the goverment be it republicans or democrats. I expect them to stay within the bounds of the costitution. Period.

Seems more people would want the same instead of being sheep.

The Constitution gives you the right to bear arms. It doesn't say what kind.

The FDA can limit what you eat and what drugs you take. DHS says who can live in this country and who cannot. Your DMV tells you what kind of vehicle is street legal and what kind is not.

I can't wrap my head around the logic that if it is manufactured and it has a trigger, it's constitutionally protected.

I feel the goverment has infringed into peoples lifes to much already. They just keep taking. As you stated above.

So a question for you. At what point will you as a "new age progressive" say enough is enough to the goverment? What will have to happen for you to say stop and to look at what is happening?

Im trying to find your logic.

You must be posting from your wilderness compound in the middle of Idaho

You are looking at the constitution far too literally.

Well study some history and educate yourself. You will find what happens to societies when they start handing all the power to the politicians I.E. become sheep.

You should study some actual history and quit using such neophyte and extremely vague analogies. A government restricting ammunition and assault rifles does not equate to citizens being sent to internment camps.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

The left only likes to take the constitution literally (or just make stuff up from it - enter right to privacy) when it fits their plans. Right to assemble freely only applies to the left, freedom of speech only applies to the left, right to keep and bear arms only applied to a militia, etc. etc. They do like to twist the constitution. Talk about labels, they label anything that can hold 30 rounds or more as an assault rifle. They are full of it.

98.8% of paramilitary activists would agree.

[The Dude 206]

The left only likes to take the constitution literally (or just make stuff up from it - enter right to privacy) when it fits their plans. Right to assemble freely only applies to the left, freedom of speech only applies to the left, right to keep and bear arms only applied to a militia, etc. etc. They do like to twist the constitution. Talk about labels, they label anything that can hold 30 rounds or more as an assault rifle. They are full of it.

That truly is ignorant. Try basing your posts on facts, and try an honest look at the constitution and bill of rights one of these days.

[nowhereman 1]

Danno is just throwing mud on the wall (as usual) without any facts to back his claims up & all of you took it as the gospel. Here is an excerpt from an article that blows a pretty big hole in the "Obama is a left wing socialist" BS that you all peddle daily on VJ:

"A bill that Obama signed in May permits licensed gun owners to bring firearms into national parks and wildlife refuges as long as state law allows it. The new law, which takes effect in February, will replace rules from the Reagan administration that generally require that guns in national parks be locked or stored in a glove compartment or trunk."

Does that sound like Obama wants to take guns away from Skeeter & Billy Joe Bob?

[NickD 203]

The left only likes to take the constitution literally (or just make stuff up from it - enter right to privacy) when it fits their plans. Right to assemble freely only applies to the left, freedom of speech only applies to the left, right to keep and bear arms only applied to a militia, etc. etc. They do like to twist the constitution. Talk about labels, they label anything that can hold 30 rounds or more as an assault rifle. They are full of it.

That truly is ignorant. Try basing your posts on facts, and try an honest look at the constitution and bill of rights one of these days.

You can keep your so-called assault weapons, I want an F-22 loaded with incendiary bombs and nuclear warhead missiles. Would rather take a Nimitz class aircraft carrier, but don't have space for it in my pond.

[natty bumppo 297]

The left only likes to take the constitution literally (or just make stuff up from it - enter right to privacy) when it fits their plans. Right to assemble freely only applies to the left, freedom of speech only applies to the left, right to keep and bear arms only applied to a militia, etc. etc. They do like to twist the constitution. Talk about labels, they label anything that can hold 30 rounds or more as an assault rifle. They are full of it.

That truly is ignorant. Try basing your posts on facts, and try an honest look at the constitution and bill of rights one of these days.

You can keep your so-called assault weapons, I want an F-22 loaded with incendiary bombs and nuclear warhead missiles. Would rather take a Nimitz class aircraft carrier, but don't have space for it in my pond.

if you've got the cash to afford these toys ... have you already quit your day job?

[LaL 418]

Toys?

[Otto 83]

Firearm in question (in one of its variations)...(the 'older brother' to the M16/M4)

Not a big fan of so-called gun control but I do kind of have to wonder about just who is buying this type of weapon...

[natty bumppo 297]

Toys?

releases and resets hook