Is It Really Necessary????

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

just make an island.. with a pawn shop-gun store next to a trader joes. and there u get all the rethugs and dem hippies..

and since both ** and hippie males tend to be gay it will work out well

are you talkin from experience, sh!tmouth?

observation, my hippie friend.

[chri'stina 190]

Maybe the ppl who actually respectfully listen to other ppls opinions hardly post in those topics since they know how it goes. Those who attack on both sides are obvious haha.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

But mostly they don't. They just keep blabbering on about obvious nonsense for which they have no back-up whatsoever. Nor do they offer any no matter how often one asks for it. Not their fault, you say, because evidence of their frivolous claims simply doesn't exist? Great, then it would be time to concede that one was wrong.

I don't agree...I see many valid points on both sides get lost in the fray of 'you moronic so and so' bs because it's such a game of tug of war between 'I'm right' and 'You're wrong'. Like I said, perhaps I am mellowing, but it really just gets tiring to see.

Stop being a sanctimonious blowhard, Lisa!

[Ban Hammer 14,266]

besides, everyone knows you have to be hella stupid to be republican

conceptually challenged would be the pc term.

i dont do nuance, hippie

that's because you are abstractly challenged.

no, it's because his cpu is underclocked.

Was that a double entendre, Charles? Because if I didn't know any better, I'd say you were talkin sh!t about AJ's package.

he's running usb 1.1 on a usb 2.0 port

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Maybe the ppl who actually respectfully listen to other ppls opinions hardly post in those topics since they know how it goes. Those who attack on both sides are obvious haha.

Mind stepping off that pedestal?

[chri'stina 190]

Maybe the ppl who actually respectfully listen to other ppls opinions hardly post in those topics since they know how it goes. Those who attack on both sides are obvious haha.

Mind stepping off that pedestal?

No way.

[Ban Hammer 14,266]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

But mostly they don't. They just keep blabbering on about obvious nonsense for which they have no back-up whatsoever. Nor do they offer any no matter how often one asks for it. Not their fault, you say, because evidence of their frivolous claims simply doesn't exist? Great, then it would be time to concede that one was wrong.

I don't agree...I see many valid points on both sides get lost in the fray of 'you moronic so and so' bs because it's such a game of tug of war between 'I'm right' and 'You're wrong'. Like I said, perhaps I am mellowing, but it really just gets tiring to see.

Stop being a sanctimonious blowhard, Lisa!

apparently the last time you got spanked like a redheaded stepchild has been forgotten........

[one...two...tree 2,762]

besides, everyone knows you have to be hella stupid to be republican

conceptually challenged would be the pc term.

i dont do nuance, hippie

that's because you are abstractly challenged.

no, it's because his cpu is underclocked.

Was that a double entendre, Charles? Because if I didn't know any better, I'd say you were talkin sh!t about AJ's package.

he's running usb 1.1 on a usb 2.0 port

goddammit...take your's and AJ's sex talk to a private chat room. This is a family website.

Maybe the ppl who actually respectfully listen to other ppls opinions hardly post in those topics since they know how it goes. Those who attack on both sides are obvious haha.

Mind stepping off that pedestal?

No way.

[Fandango 1,440]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

I do when they miss the point of the issue(which was what I was saying, my point) and try to focus on some small insignificant part of it just so they can go against the grain as you just did. Seems so childish to me.

I believe you've misunderstood my response.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

But mostly they don't. They just keep blabbering on about obvious nonsense for which they have no back-up whatsoever. Nor do they offer any no matter how often one asks for it. Not their fault, you say, because evidence of their frivolous claims simply doesn't exist? Great, then it would be time to concede that one was wrong.

I don't agree...I see many valid points on both sides get lost in the fray of 'you moronic so and so' bs because it's such a game of tug of war between 'I'm right' and 'You're wrong'. Like I said, perhaps I am mellowing, but it really just gets tiring to see.

Valid points can be substantiated. Go back, if you would, through the POTUS citizenship thread that was closed this morning, and point out to me which valid point of those claiming that Obama lacks proper US citizenship I have missed. Please, point that out to me.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

I do when they miss the point of the issue(which was what I was saying, my point) and try to focus on some small insignificant part of it just so they can go against the grain as you just did. Seems so childish to me.

I believe you've misunderstood my response.

he's misunderestimated you

[_Simpson_ 250]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

I do when they miss the point of the issue(which was what I was saying, my point) and try to focus on some small insignificant part of it just so they can go against the grain as you just did. Seems so childish to me.

did you just attack lisa?

omg man. only god can help you now. even i know better than to do that!

attack!? Do we need to pull out a dictionary for you my mentally challenged friend.

[pedroh 21]

but but but, Barry Osama is a mexican!! OMG he can't be POTUS, cuz his BC is photoshopped.. omgomgomg..

[Fandango 1,440]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

I do when they miss the point of the issue(which was what I was saying, my point) and try to focus on some small insignificant part of it just so they can go against the grain as you just did. Seems so childish to me.

did you just attack lisa?

omg man. only god can help you now. even i know better than to do that!

LOL, I'm a changed woman, G...no more pent up angst, so no need to tear any new a$$holes anymore

But that response of his/hers is a perfect example of how something can escalate from a rational discussion to a pissing contest. But, I'm not gonna bite, as you already saw

[Mags 112]

Who cares if someone goes against the grain? If they back up their point with reasons, then I think it should be considered a valid POV, even if I don't agree

I do when they miss the point of the issue(which was what I was saying, my point) and try to focus on some small insignificant part of it just so they can go against the grain as you just did. Seems so childish to me.

did you just attack lisa?

omg man. only god can help you now. even i know better than to do that!

attack!? Do we need to pull out a dictionary for you my mentally challenged friend.

You in trouble now, boy! She's gonna hit you with her knobbly stick!

Edited July 16, 2009 by Persephone