Liberals voice concerns about Obama

[kaydee457 13]

It's really comical the way you, HAL, Paul, Madam, and the other resident libruls in this forum always congregate in the same thread, circle the wagons and then engage in a war of wits, nope simply attrition.....

You wear me out, sigh.....Wish I could be young and naive again!

BTW, Obama's lowered the bar so much, emboldening anyone and everyone that now, of all people, Fran Dresher is interested in Hillary's Senate seat......Nanny State anyone?

[mox 298]

It's really comical the way you, HAL, Paul, Madam, and the other resident libruls in this forum always congregate in the same thread, circle the wagons and then engage in a war of wits, nope simply attrition.....

It's really comical the way you are so predictable in your views. Democrat=evil, Republican=good. Liberal=evil, Conservative=good. Blue=evil, Red=good. Obama=evil, Bush=good. There are no shades of gray in your thinking, no exceptions, and above all, no critical thinking. You pick and choose the narrowest definitions and interpretations that fit within your narrow worldview, and present these views as undisputable fact. When someone offers a counterpoint to your own views, they are librul wagon circlers because you cannot possibly envision a world that operates outside of your own biases. Your views are solidly grounded on the far right of the political and social spectrum where less than 10% of this country lives.

Not that it's not entertaining. Carry on my wayward son.

[Niels Bohr 72]

I would've supported Bush had he done a good job a President. Obama is something new and different. I'd say let him run and see what happens. Is that circular reasoning? Or, is circular reasoning involves situation where one keep on supporting someone who has clearly demonstrated a lack of govern?

Edited December 9, 2008 by Niels Bohr

[Fandango 1,440]

'Change they believed in!'

'Oh No He Didn't!'

[SpiritAlight 1]

I got a visual of us circling our wagons...phew...that was so fun!

Thanks for that.

Did you watch the video I posted:

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...t&p=2463917

you might like it!

[Peikko 1,575]

Yeah, wagons rolling. There are certain posters who seem to feel that posting on VJ is a war of attrition. So be it, I find it hysterical though

[HAL 9000 96]

It's really comical the way you, HAL, Paul, Madam, and the other resident libruls in this forum always congregate in the same thread, circle the wagons and then engage in a war of wits, nope simply attrition.....

You wear me out, sigh.....Wish I could be young and naive again!

BTW, Obama's lowered the bar so much, emboldening anyone and everyone that now, of all people, Fran Dresher is interested in Hillary's Senate seat......Nanny State anyone?

Poor, poor Kaydee.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

It's really comical the way you, HAL, Paul, Madam, and the other resident libruls in this forum always congregate in the same thread, circle the wagons and then engage in a war of wits, nope simply attrition.....

You wear me out, sigh.....Wish I could be young and naive again!

BTW, Obama's lowered the bar so much, emboldening anyone and everyone that now, of all people, Fran Dresher is interested in Hillary's Senate seat......Nanny State anyone?

Are you sure? I mean... Bush lowered the bar flush to the floor. How much lower is it possible to go?

There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — [pauses] - shame on you. Fool me — I can't get fooled again.

[Peikko 1,575]

Oh, and for the record Kaydee, I'm not a member of any political party.

[HAL 9000 96]

Lets get used to it folks... political wackjobs will likely whine, moan, and complain about anything for the remainder of the Presidential term, then whine even more every time Obama does something positive for this country, proving yet again (not that their own self-declared lunacy needs third party verification) that the wackos will be wackos for the sake of being wackos. There's no pleasing the bad apples of the bucket.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Oh, and for the record Kaydee, I'm not a member of any political party.

Something tells me that pointing that out probably won't make a difference. When someone has ordered their world according to a narrow set of preconceptions - they just aren't interested in what people have to say.

[Ban Hammer 14,286]

amazing - 90% of the posts in this thread are all about attacking kaydee rather than discussing the topic.

[SpiritAlight 1]

You have been labelled.

"Where am I?"

"In the Village."

"What do you want?"

"Information."

"Whose side are you on?"

"That would be telling... We want information. Information! INFORMATION!"

"You won't get it."

"By hook or by crook, we will."

"Who are you?"

"The new Number Two."

"Who is Number One?"

"You are Number Six."

"I am not a number - I am a free man!"

(Laughter from Number Two.)

Edited December 10, 2008 by SpiritAlight

[Danno 1,228]

amazing - 90% of the posts in this thread are all about attacking kaydee rather than discussing the topic.

Nothing new.

Any assessment of Obama, will instantly be sidetracked.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

amazing - 90% of the posts in this thread are all about attacking kaydee rather than discussing the topic.

Nothing new.

Any assessment of Obama, will instantly be sidetracked.

Its not so much the assessment of Obama - as much as the use of this op-ed piece to suggest that people here who supported Obama in the election are somehow naiive.