Jump to content
Pooky

Amnesty by Administrative Action

By Pooky in Current Events and Hot Social Topics

 Share

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Pooky Grand Master

Pooky   3,348

Posted
Filed: Country: England
 Timeline
Posted

For anyone who didn't believe that the USCIS, and therefore the White House, wasn't seriously looking into bypassing Congress and using Administrative Action to enact "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" (i.e. Amnesty), here is the memo the Republican Senators were asking this administration to disavow. And they won't, because they can't.

pic_memo_UCIS_072910.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_2.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_3.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_4.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_5.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_6.jpg

Pages 7 - 11 to follow

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_7.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_8.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_9.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_10.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_11.jpg

pic_memo_UCIS_072910_11.jpg

Don't interrupt me when I'm talking to myself

2011-11-15.garfield.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites
justashooter Experienced

justashooter   430

Posted
Filed: Country: China
 Timeline
Posted

this memo is from a group of high level USCIS officers to the USCIS director. it is not from obama, but it may have been generated with his inability to change anything by legal process in mind. it describes a suggestion to expand existing remedies in terms of scope, and to create new remedies. i do not believe that the congress, the judiciary, or the American people would stand for enactment of such changes in policy on a wide scale. this memo is the product of some high ranking fruitcake political appointees who are out of touch with reality.

driving thru a gas station to avoid a red light is still illegal, no matter how you slice it.

____________________________________________________________________________

obamasolyndrafleeced-lmao.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mawilson Grand Master

mawilson   2,133

Posted
Filed: Country: United Kingdom
 Timeline
Posted

Let's start with the first sentence:

"In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations..."

How can they do that absent a legislative change to the INA?

biden_pinhead.jpgspace.gifrolling-stones-american-flag-tongue.jpgspace.gifinside-geico.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   43,058

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted
How can they do that absent a legislative change to the INA?
Same way as with everything else -- by imperial decree.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   43,058

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted
Well that would be illegal.
Has that stopped them yet?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
evli1966 Rising Star

evli1966   88

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
 Timeline
Posted

Hmmm

I think this was touched on but involved the prez more and would require a presidentual pardon of sorts which can be done with out congress. Madhouse am I hyperboling now that it was suggested back then?

Steve can you please step up and show us where on the BELOVED CONSTITUTION that allows them to do this.

According to all naysayers we are a republic which we are and so the majority of people will not have a say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...