Family

Hear the audio of Kari Lake and top Arizona Republican official that led to his resignation Lake claims Dewit tried to bribe her to keep her out of the 2024 Senate race. DeWit denied trying to bribe Lake, and said he's resigning because Lake is threatening to release additional recordings of him.m https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2024/01/25/kari-lake-jeff-dewit-arizona-republican-recording-ctm-vpx-new.cnn

Print out the Interpol Poster , add copy of spouses green card and mail it to ICE/FBI/local police and interpol. …if you no longer want to be their ride or die…. The charges from home country are definitely pre LPR and both you and the US got played . https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/Red-Notices/View-Red-Notices

I hear you , loud and clear . At some point ( let’s say start of Trump era ..for accuracy ) they went stealth 😂..stopped accepting Service Motions for Service Error and drastic changes to transparency . Example in 2012 , and they were https://www.uscis.gov/archive/uscis-to-expedite-review-for-certain-cases-affected-by-specific-administrative-inaccuracies Plus if attorney on record did not get notice , that was an automatic ground ..that too is gone . In the meantime, do a FOIA for all their systems and request ALL notices mailed to you and attorneys of record . https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pia-uscis-elis056a-december2018.pdf

Although below is for reopening removal orders : EOIR ..it is helpful reading and formatting https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/practice_advisory/lac_pa_092104.pdf The presumption of effective service can be overcome if the respondent demonstrates nondelivery or improper delivery by the Postal Service. Id. Nondelivery or improper delivery can be established by submitting substantial and probative evidence, such as documentary evidence from the Postal Service and affidavits. Id. For example, if there were ongoing problems with the mail delivery, you may want to provide details about the problems and affidavits from people with direct knowledge of the problem. Post IIRAIRA Cases There is a weaker presumption of delivery where the notice was sent by regular mail. Matter of M-R-A-, 24 I&N Dec. 665 (BIA 2008); Matter of C-R-C-, 24 I&N Dec. 677 (BIA 2008). In determining whether the respondent has overcome this presumption, the immigration judge must consider both circumstantial and corroborating evidence, and may consider a variety of factors, including (but not limited) to: -- respondent’s affidavit -- affidavits from family members and other individuals who are knowledgeable about the relevant facts -- respondent’s actions upon learning about the in absentia order and whether he or she exercised due diligence in seeking redress -- any prior affirmative application for relief or application filed with USCIS or prima facie eligibility for relief (to help establish an incentive to appear) -- previous attendance at immigration court hearings -- other circumstances or evidence indicating possible non-receipt

When I come across a “ With all due respect…” sentence , I usually know none is coming 😂. ..so I will disagree better. I-290 B can and often do work … Devil’s in the Details . ..

I recall those details ( attorney’s statement and your screenshots) . Don’t be dissuaded . The DIY price of filing again ( both I-290 B and I-751) is effective flanking maneuver AND keeps you in status as you continue your studies and life. Add old neighbor affidavits w new I-290 B . ..mark both options . And don’t be shy about filing I-751 for hardship ..you just need basic filing and request an I-751 interview IN PERSON at initial filing , any RFE. In the long run ..you will win . If you prevail on the I-290 B then you immediately file N-400 under 5 years 😂. Attack from all sides

Honestly, I am inclined to think infopass officer at old field office won’t be much help. ..unless you can persuade him of his supervisor to send your file to your new field office….as they inherited “ jurisdiction “ the moment AR-11 was filed

Do you wish to bring only Baby or both Baby and Mother ?

I hope you now have FOIA d for complete records of your adj/I-751 and I-290 B filings ..since all were done by attorneys. You never came back w details of specific reasons given in the I-290 B denial. ..nor is it clear if you took any action other than consulting attorneys. Even if you can’t afford to hire them ..you are very smart , cool /calm as a cucumber and very capable to handle this ! Am also hoping you did the following: 1. Filed a “ late filed “ I-290 B ..mark both motion to re open /Motion to reconsider …this is specific to the first denied I-290 B . Point out that there is no evidence on record that a notice of interview was ever mailed to you Obtain an affidavit from any old neighbor that says they have had problems w mail 2. Filed a new Late Filed I-751 , mark hardship..and as noted in earlier posts state a claim on the additional reasons on last page of form . So their hold just means , no action on NTA or sending you to court

You may get lucky and they pull back the misrep inadmissibility..but as another noted , it’s rare. You cannot afford to let your case go into the black hole again without raising the CSPA issue. So try to email consulate claim to CSPA and get legal help if they sit on case , refuse to give you an updated WRITTEN decision ( not just a phone call ) in case they stick to inadmissibility charge .

Okay. Did they unlock your DS-260 for updates , ask for a new medical before the interview and did he/she keep your passport ?

Can you please answer : Did YOU talk to the officer about the misrepresentation? Did you give your evidence?

I had hoped YOU would have presented your evidence and asked questions while there. It is crucial to fight for CSPA protection and position the “ old case” as delay not caused by you. If you did not do that at interview, at least do it now by emailing consulate . You need to have dad contact congressman , contact Washington for advisory opinion …MAKE SOME NOISE. ..

Oldies

Oh she was smart enough to convince him to pay the million dollar sanction she was slapped with ( for frivolous lawsuit ) 😂 … Hard to choose if that’s a pro for her or con for him Enjoy

Asylum approvals are hard , Haiti has one highest denial rates. Certainly worth fighting for, if no other options. Do it soon as it will get more difficult

The I-130 Petition will automatically include all. Just send everyone‘a birth certificate and sisters marriage certificate as well. The petition will be approved pretty quickly ( a year or so)..but the link tells you how long before visa will be available. What country? Is asylum an option?

You cannot file anything for a brother-in-law or nephews . The petition covers Principal Beneficiary ( your sister ) and derivatives ( spouse and kids). If you look at that link it tells you how long before the petition will be current…so no adjustment permitted except for IR /immediate relatives such spouse/child/parent of a USC . The IR category does not need to wait WHY?…it’s the law

Alina has her own ethics woes..

Holy Mac..those are BIG paper changes . ..am guessing even bigger personal changes . Assuming none of this will be a surprise for your partner , no need to delay . You can submit new documents ( from Court, new US passport and new DMV ) to USCIS as Supplementary Evidence via mail or upload to online account . You will definitely need to point out /state clearly you have changed gender as well as name . You will also send original court docs to your fiancé at time of interview . Your fingerprints are the same ..so they won’t have issues w conducting FBI rap sheet. ..they get a hit no Matter What Name pops up anyway

You can file only an I-130 for your sister. Her husband and children under 21 are included. See link to get an idea of how long the wait for priority date is. They cannot adjust /I-485 at this time . They can keep requesting renewal of HP . IF there is no going back to home country…they can apply for asylum before one year passes. https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/legal/visa-law0/visa-bulletin/2024/visa-bulletin-for-february-2024.html

I believe she proved the raps under the Adult Survivors new law , and then proved malice and disregard for truth . rather than just negligence .. It would have ended there ..but Defendant put his foot in his mouth and will now pay at least double 😂. https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Carroll II DI 38 Opinion.pdf https://www.minclaw.com/public-figure-defamation/ In the context of defamation, a public figure is generally defined as an individual who has assumed a role of prominence in society or voluntarily or involuntarily thrust themselves into the public spotlight, like a government official, a celebrity, or even a person at the heart of a controversy. Public figures have a higher burden of proof when bringing a defamation claim; they must show that the defendant acted with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth when publishing a false statement. A private figure, on the other hand, is generally defined as anyone who does not qualify as a public figure and is not in the public spotlight. Private figures must only prove that the defendant acted with ordinary negligence when publishing a false statement.

The Chosen One , Donald …ultimately his followers who tithe dutifully. …

From your link ..she said “they “ ..consider the fantasies . Not “ hers” by any stretch . Do recall, she passed the credibility test ..a jury . Cooper had asked writer E. Jean Carroll, 75, if she felt like she was a victim. During a discussion of her allegations with the CNN host, Carroll maintained that there was nothing “sexual” about her alleged rape in the dressing room of a New York department store. “I was not thrown on the ground and ravaged,” Carroll said, denying that she was a victim. “The word rape carries so many sexual connotations. This was not sexual. It just hurt.” Carroll described the alleged event between Trump and her as a “fight” rather than “rape.” Cooper responded by saying that most people would likely think of rape as a violent assault, to which Carroll responded that she thinks most people find rape “sexy.” She said: “I think most people think of rape as being sexy. They think of the fantasies.” Clearly uncomfortable, Cooper swiftly cut in and said they would take a quick break. Carroll described the alleged event between Trump and her as a “fight” rather than “rape.” Cooper responded by saying that most people would likely think of rape as a violent assault, to which Carroll responded that she thinks most people find rape “sexy.” She said: “I think most people think of rape as being sexy. They think of the fantasies.”