mitzab

From what I found in the USCIS Policy Manual, Vol. 9, Part C, and based on attorney experiences shared through reddit forums, denial rates for reentry permits are low and typically tied to fraud or failure to follow procedure. So yes, it’s generally worth bringing someone into the U.S. to apply, even after years abroad, if they still hold LPR status and can show ongoing ties (like filing U.S. taxes). The bigger risk lies with CBP at reentry and not with USCIS denying the permit, and I believe this is what other members are inclined in their responses as well. 

From what I found in the USCIS Policy Manual, Vol. 9, Part C, and based on attorney experiences shared through reddit forums, denial rates for reentry permits are low and typically tied to fraud or failure to follow procedure. So yes, it’s generally worth bringing someone into the U.S. to apply, even after years abroad, if they still hold LPR status and can show ongoing ties (like filing U.S. taxes). The bigger risk lies with CBP at reentry and not with USCIS denying the permit, and I believe this is what other members are inclined in their responses as well. 

From what I found in the USCIS Policy Manual, Vol. 9, Part C, and based on attorney experiences shared through reddit forums, denial rates for reentry permits are low and typically tied to fraud or failure to follow procedure. So yes, it’s generally worth bringing someone into the U.S. to apply, even after years abroad, if they still hold LPR status and can show ongoing ties (like filing U.S. taxes). The bigger risk lies with CBP at reentry and not with USCIS denying the permit, and I believe this is what other members are inclined in their responses as well. 

(c) Ineligibility —
 
(1) Prior document still valid. An application for a reentry permit or refugee travel document will be denied if the applicant was previously issued a reentry permit or refugee travel document which is still valid, unless it was returned to USCIS or it is demonstrated that it was lost.
(2) Extended absences. A reentry permit issued to a person who, since becoming a permanent resident or during the last five years, whichever is less, has been outside the United States for more than four years in the aggregate, shall be limited to a validity of one year, except that a permit with a validity of two years may be issued to:
(i) A permanent resident described in 8 CFR 211.1(a)(6) or (a)(7);
(ii) A permanent resident employed by a public international organization of which the United States is a member by treaty or statute, and his or her permanent resident spouse and children; or
(iii) A permanent resident who is a professional athlete who regularly competes in the United States and worldwide.
(3) Permanent resident entitled to nonimmigrant diplomatic or treaty status. A permanent resident entitled to nonimmigrant status under section 101(a)(15)(A), (E), or (G) of the Act because of occupational status may only be issued a reentry permit if the applicant executes and submits with the application, or has previously executed and submitted, a written waiver as required by 8 CFR part 247.
(d) Effect of travel before a decision is made. Departure from the United States before a decision is made on an application for a reentry permit or refugee travel document will not affect the application.
(e) Processing. USCIS may approve or deny a request for a reentry permit or refugee travel document as an exercise of discretion. If it approves the application, USCIS will issue an appropriate document.
(f) Effect on proceedings. Issuance of a reentry permit or refugee travel document to a person in exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings shall not affect those proceedings.
(g) Appeal. Denial of an application for a reentry permit or refugee travel document may be appealed in accordance with 8 CFR 103.3.
 
 
 
https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-8/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-223/section-223.2

From what I found in the USCIS Policy Manual, Vol. 9, Part C, and based on attorney experiences shared through reddit forums, denial rates for reentry permits are low and typically tied to fraud or failure to follow procedure. So yes, it’s generally worth bringing someone into the U.S. to apply, even after years abroad, if they still hold LPR status and can show ongoing ties (like filing U.S. taxes). The bigger risk lies with CBP at reentry and not with USCIS denying the permit, and I believe this is what other members are inclined in their responses as well. 

From what I found in the USCIS Policy Manual, Vol. 9, Part C, and based on attorney experiences shared through reddit forums, denial rates for reentry permits are low and typically tied to fraud or failure to follow procedure. So yes, it’s generally worth bringing someone into the U.S. to apply, even after years abroad, if they still hold LPR status and can show ongoing ties (like filing U.S. taxes). The bigger risk lies with CBP at reentry and not with USCIS denying the permit, and I believe this is what other members are inclined in their responses as well. 

awesome , congrats

After such a long journey the day is here. 
 
My wife passed her citizenship exam and we are awaiting the naturalization ceremony.  
 
I am so excited for her !
 

No need, health department will contact you if necessary. It should have no impact on the AOS. They have the I-693 (it was in the packet your fiance had to hand over at the border) and if their DS-3025 was properly completed you are good to go (for the medical part). 

congratulations to you and hopefully you will reunite with your loved one very soon. 
 
 

No I won't ask for a joint sponsor and didn't need one. I didn't play their joint sponsor games. I resubmitted my 221g with a simplified explanation of my assets and also a citation of the assets policy. Boom! Visa approved.

If your friend disclosed to the immigration officer during their visa interview that they plan to give birth in the U.S., and their visa was granted, that is perfectly fine. Likewise, if they inform CBP upon arrival and are still allowed entry, there is no issue.
 
However, I doubt your friend has done either of these. While it is not illegal to give birth in the U.S., and current law grants the child U.S. citizenship, your friend should not assume this will provide any immigration benefits for the parents. According to a Georgetown study in 2013, over 153,000 children have had at least one parent deported. (I am sure the numbers are much higher now) Having a U.S. citizen child does not automatically grant legal status to the parents.
 
Additionally, the cost of childbirth in the U.S. can be extremely high, and your friend is taking a significant financial and legal risk. Lying to immigration officers—whether during the visa interview or at the CBP checkpoint can lead to denial of entry, visa revocation, and even future bans from the U.S.
 
Lastly, there is ongoing political debate about ending birthright citizenship. While it is unclear how such a policy change would be implemented, it is a possibility under this administration. Your friend should carefully consider all these factors before proceeding.

Also, myself being an immigrant from Pakistan and knowing the Pakistani community here always run in these scenarios and I can assure you none of the people who did this will have anything positive to say about it (because most of them chose to become illegal themselves after the child birth).

you can check my timeline to have a general idea about how long it took for k1 admin processing. But everyone is different keep that in mind.

If your friend disclosed to the immigration officer during their visa interview that they plan to give birth in the U.S., and their visa was granted, that is perfectly fine. Likewise, if they inform CBP upon arrival and are still allowed entry, there is no issue.
 
However, I doubt your friend has done either of these. While it is not illegal to give birth in the U.S., and current law grants the child U.S. citizenship, your friend should not assume this will provide any immigration benefits for the parents. According to a Georgetown study in 2013, over 153,000 children have had at least one parent deported. (I am sure the numbers are much higher now) Having a U.S. citizen child does not automatically grant legal status to the parents.
 
Additionally, the cost of childbirth in the U.S. can be extremely high, and your friend is taking a significant financial and legal risk. Lying to immigration officers—whether during the visa interview or at the CBP checkpoint can lead to denial of entry, visa revocation, and even future bans from the U.S.
 
Lastly, there is ongoing political debate about ending birthright citizenship. While it is unclear how such a policy change would be implemented, it is a possibility under this administration. Your friend should carefully consider all these factors before proceeding.

Also, myself being an immigrant from Pakistan and knowing the Pakistani community here always run in these scenarios and I can assure you none of the people who did this will have anything positive to say about it (because most of them chose to become illegal themselves after the child birth).

If your friend disclosed to the immigration officer during their visa interview that they plan to give birth in the U.S., and their visa was granted, that is perfectly fine. Likewise, if they inform CBP upon arrival and are still allowed entry, there is no issue.
 
However, I doubt your friend has done either of these. While it is not illegal to give birth in the U.S., and current law grants the child U.S. citizenship, your friend should not assume this will provide any immigration benefits for the parents. According to a Georgetown study in 2013, over 153,000 children have had at least one parent deported. (I am sure the numbers are much higher now) Having a U.S. citizen child does not automatically grant legal status to the parents.
 
Additionally, the cost of childbirth in the U.S. can be extremely high, and your friend is taking a significant financial and legal risk. Lying to immigration officers—whether during the visa interview or at the CBP checkpoint can lead to denial of entry, visa revocation, and even future bans from the U.S.
 
Lastly, there is ongoing political debate about ending birthright citizenship. While it is unclear how such a policy change would be implemented, it is a possibility under this administration. Your friend should carefully consider all these factors before proceeding.

Also, myself being an immigrant from Pakistan and knowing the Pakistani community here always run in these scenarios and I can assure you none of the people who did this will have anything positive to say about it (because most of them chose to become illegal themselves after the child birth).

If your friend disclosed to the immigration officer during their visa interview that they plan to give birth in the U.S., and their visa was granted, that is perfectly fine. Likewise, if they inform CBP upon arrival and are still allowed entry, there is no issue.
 
However, I doubt your friend has done either of these. While it is not illegal to give birth in the U.S., and current law grants the child U.S. citizenship, your friend should not assume this will provide any immigration benefits for the parents. According to a Georgetown study in 2013, over 153,000 children have had at least one parent deported. (I am sure the numbers are much higher now) Having a U.S. citizen child does not automatically grant legal status to the parents.
 
Additionally, the cost of childbirth in the U.S. can be extremely high, and your friend is taking a significant financial and legal risk. Lying to immigration officers—whether during the visa interview or at the CBP checkpoint can lead to denial of entry, visa revocation, and even future bans from the U.S.
 
Lastly, there is ongoing political debate about ending birthright citizenship. While it is unclear how such a policy change would be implemented, it is a possibility under this administration. Your friend should carefully consider all these factors before proceeding.

Also, myself being an immigrant from Pakistan and knowing the Pakistani community here always run in these scenarios and I can assure you none of the people who did this will have anything positive to say about it (because most of them chose to become illegal themselves after the child birth).

If your friend disclosed to the immigration officer during their visa interview that they plan to give birth in the U.S., and their visa was granted, that is perfectly fine. Likewise, if they inform CBP upon arrival and are still allowed entry, there is no issue.
 
However, I doubt your friend has done either of these. While it is not illegal to give birth in the U.S., and current law grants the child U.S. citizenship, your friend should not assume this will provide any immigration benefits for the parents. According to a Georgetown study in 2013, over 153,000 children have had at least one parent deported. (I am sure the numbers are much higher now) Having a U.S. citizen child does not automatically grant legal status to the parents.
 
Additionally, the cost of childbirth in the U.S. can be extremely high, and your friend is taking a significant financial and legal risk. Lying to immigration officers—whether during the visa interview or at the CBP checkpoint can lead to denial of entry, visa revocation, and even future bans from the U.S.
 
Lastly, there is ongoing political debate about ending birthright citizenship. While it is unclear how such a policy change would be implemented, it is a possibility under this administration. Your friend should carefully consider all these factors before proceeding.

Also, myself being an immigrant from Pakistan and knowing the Pakistani community here always run in these scenarios and I can assure you none of the people who did this will have anything positive to say about it (because most of them chose to become illegal themselves after the child birth).

Not sure if anyone is still around. Curious where you all are nowadays? Did you get approved for the K1, move to the US, do your AOS? 
 
My Green Card arrived 2 days ago. So glad it’s over for a while.

Yes we are so glad as well! We received EAD a month after filing for AOS and green card 3 months after!

tell them exactly what happened

We filed my wife's I-751 petition last month, and thanks to this forum, we started collecting documentation from the moment she arrived in the U.S., knowing these documents would be needed at some point.
 
For our submission, we included front and back copies of her Green Card, driver’s licenses showing the same address, and quarterly joint bank account statements. Since I couldn't add her to the mortgage, I immediately added her name to the utility bills upon her arrival. We also submitted credit card statements and a car insurance policy listing both of us (If you have it add this as well). Additionally, we included eight photos (four per page) documenting our travels together. Plus other proofs.
 
One thing to keep in mind: don’t overthink or overcomplicate the process—you can only submit what you genuinely have. USCIS simply seeks sufficient evidence to confirm your marriage is bona fide. Focus on providing the strongest documentation available, and remember that quality matters more than quantity.
 
Wishing you the best of luck with your petition!
 

I filed my wife's AOS in Jan 2022, i just selected More than one trip and did nothing else, no documents or anything. even on my form I left city town country empty because it asked if you want to rcv it in some other country. You can look up at my timelines to get sense of it and also if you can kindly update your own time line as it is very beneficial for people here. 

 

thank you so much for sharing this with me.
yes, the lack of communication has been making me a lil bit uncomfortable.
gladly I got the tracking number and checking my case with emma.
it said that USCIS already has been received my package and I need to wait for the receipt number in the mailbox up to 30 days.
hopefully both of us hear something back from USCIS soon and everything goes well for us 🤞

Hopefully, you’ll receive your notice soon. Once you do, you can create an online account to track your progress on USCIS. Unless your case is particularly complex, most USCIS forms are straightforward, and there are plenty of resources to guide you through the process. Wishing you the best.

Let's see from your TImeline.
2024-11 is your NOA1.
 
The latest VJ Timeline K1 data are at
https://www.visajourney.com/times/k1-fiance-visa-historical/
 
2025-04 to 2025-05: Texas Service Center NOA1 to NOA2 is on average 140-166 days (5-6 months)
2025-06 to 2025-07: NOA2 to NVC is about 68 days (2 months)
2025-08 to 2025-09: At NVC (32 days) to consulate (3 days)
 
For Italy, the days receiving from NVC to interview is about 78-92 days (2-3 months)
https://www.visajourney.com/timeline/stats.php
2025-10 to 2025-12: You can choose to schedule the medical or interview for later dates in a window of 4 to 6 weeks (about 1 to 1.5 months).
 
The K1 visa itself is good for 5 months after it is issued.
2025-03 to 2025-05: K1 expiration, unless I'm missing some calculations?
 
So I would not request a NOA2 extension but instead, after the consulate receives your case, schedule the medical or the consulate interview for later dates in the window of 4- to 6-weeks as that may give you more control of the timing and schedule.