Jump to content

65 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

Hi,

Let me give you brief introduction to my case before sharing my concern.

I have recently been engaged. It's an arranged relationship. My fiancee is in India. The relationship developed when my fiancee family responded to the matrimonial advertisement for me in an established Indian newspaper. In the follow up maters, my elder brother and his wife flew down to India to fix the relationship (A practice that still exists in my culture where elders/parents seek out a match for you). And luckily everything worked out fine and both families decided to engage us. Both my finacee and myself had the opportunity to know each other through snaps, phone and email, IAM. And now we are in deep love (isn't that something...).

Now let me come to the point, The clause/stipulation 18 of form I-129F requires that we should have been physically met in the past 2 years to file for k1-Visa. I am just wondering if anyone had success in getting a waiver on that requirement outside of the basis of financial hardship and social customs prohibiting the meeting. What I am trying to ask here is how strictly this condition is weighed by the USCIS. And do I have a chance to avoid the rejection on K1-Visa based on the facts that I have described in the first paragraph.

Any thoughts, personal experiences/citations will be highly appreciated. (FYI, I did call in to USCIS to inquire on this but failed to get an answer in Yes/No form on this question).

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: China
Timeline
Posted

It is very rare that they will waive the meeting in person requirement.

This question comes up often, SEE: http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...st&p=879763

OUR TIME LINE Please do a timeline it helps us all, thanks.

Is now a US Citizen immigration completed Jan 12, 2012.

1428954228.1592.1755425389.png

CHIN0001_zps9c01d045.gifCHIN0100_zps02549215.gifTAIW0001_zps9a9075f1.gifVIET0001_zps0a49d4a7.gif

Look here: A Candle for Love and China Family Visa Forums for Chinese/American relationship,

Visa issues, and lots of info about the Guangzhou and Hong Kong consulate.

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted

If you guys have not met in person within the last 2 years there is no point in filing the Visa you will get denied anyway.

As I already told somebody on here,you guys should at least of met in in person before marrige,when I read things like that with ppl getting married before meeting up it does not surprise me that the US has the highest divorce rate.

You guys could look into a tourist Visa,living together for a while and seeing if you are ment to be together,I understand the religious beliefs but it makes no differance if I am katholic moslem or believe in the holy cow...meet up and see what kind of dude he is.

Posted

What is it that prevents you from going to visit your intended in his/her home country? There is no problem w/ it being an arranged marriage, you just have to declare it under the IMBRA laws (I think) but USCIS will deny your petition from the start if you do not meet the having met w/ in the past two years requirement. A waiver is very rarely granted.

-P

funny-dog-pictures-wtf.jpg
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted (edited)

tbos - you don't mention if there are cultural reasons or traditions that make meeting in person before marriage inappropriate and/or forbidden in your culture/religion. Are there such prohibitions or mores?

Financial hardship is a likely non-starter for you. Love ain't cheap, in any culture ;)

It is not an open-and-shut, forget about it, situation as DakotaK1 implies. The I-129F instructions clearly allow for the w/in-2-years meeting requirement, BUT it is a very narrow category and you'll need to be prepared to prove your case. And I would guess that USCIS has heard a LOT of excuses from people trying to avoid the requirement as well as received a lot of sincere requests to waive the requirement, so they may be familiar with your cultural/religious norms.

Check out the forum for your region here at VJ and see if anyone shares whatever cultural/religious grounds on which you would base your request for a waiver.

Edited by TimsDaisy

I-129F/K1

1-12-07 mailed to CSC

1-22-07 DHS cashes the I-129F check

1-23-07 NOA1 Notice Date

1-26-07 NOA1 arrives in the post

4-25-07 Touched!

4-26-07 Touched again!

5-3-07 NOA2!!! Two approval emails received at 11:36am

5-10-07 Arrived at NVC/5-14-07 Left NVC - London-bound!

5-17-07??? London receives?

5-20-07 Packet 3 mailed

5-26-07 Packet 3 received

5-29-07 Packet 3 returned, few days later than planned due to bank holiday weekend

6-06-07 Medical in London (called to schedule on May 29)

6-11-07 "Medical in file" at Embassy

6-14-07 Resent packet 3 to Embassy after hearing nothing about first try

6-22-07 DOS says "applicant now eligible for interview," ie: they enter p3 into their system

6-25-07 DOS says interview date is August 21

6-28-07 Help from our congressional representative gives us new interview date: July 6

7-06-07 Interview at 9:00 am at the London Embassy - Approved.

7-16-07 Visa delivered after 'security checks' completed

I-129F approved in 111 days; Interview 174 days from filing

Handy numbers:

NVC: (603) 334-0700 - press 1, 5; US State Department: (202) 663-1225 - press 1, 0

*Be afraid or be informed - the choice is yours.*

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Posted
If you guys have not met in person within the last 2 years there is no point in filing the Visa you will get denied anyway.

As I already told somebody on here,you guys should at least of met in in person before marrige,when I read things like that with ppl getting married before meeting up it does not surprise me that the US has the highest divorce rate.

You guys could look into a tourist Visa,living together for a while and seeing if you are ment to be together,I understand the religious beliefs but it makes no differance if I am katholic moslem or believe in the holy cow...meet up and see what kind of dude he is.

I don't see a need to preach about how somebody should decide about their marriage. Unless your religion or culture strictly forbids meeting before the wedding, you are going to have to arrange to meet in person. Period. I'll leave the rest of the value judgments to the adults of marriageable age actually marrying and encourage those offering helpful advice to keep their own value judgments to themselves.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Posted
tbos - you don't mention if there are cultural reasons or traditions that make meeting in person before marriage inappropriate and/or forbidden in your culture/religion. Are there such prohibitions or mores?

Financial hardship is a likely non-starter for you. Love ain't cheap, in any culture ;)

It is not an open-and-shut, forget about it, situation as DakotaK1 implies. The I-129F instructions clearly allow for the w/in-2-years meeting requirement, BUT it is a very narrow category and you'll need to be prepared to prove your case. And I would guess that USCIS has heard a LOT of excuses from people trying to avoid the requirement as well as received a lot of sincere requests to waive the requirement, so they may be familiar with your cultural/religious norms.

Check out the forum for your region here at VJ and see if anyone shares whatever cultural/religious grounds on which you would base your request for a waiver.

The OP did mention 'social customs' as the second reason for not meeting. Whether or not that is strong enough to waive this requirement, I dunno.

But as you suggest, I'd pose this question in the India regional forum here and see if there are any similar experiences.

SA4userbar.jpg
Posted
tbos - you don't mention if there are cultural reasons or traditions that make meeting in person before marriage inappropriate and/or forbidden in your culture/religion. Are there such prohibitions or mores?

Financial hardship is a likely non-starter for you. Love ain't cheap, in any culture ;)

It is not an open-and-shut, forget about it, situation as DakotaK1 implies. The I-129F instructions clearly allow for the w/in-2-years meeting requirement, BUT it is a very narrow category and you'll need to be prepared to prove your case. And I would guess that USCIS has heard a LOT of excuses from people trying to avoid the requirement as well as received a lot of sincere requests to waive the requirement, so they may be familiar with your cultural/religious norms.

Check out the forum for your region here at VJ and see if anyone shares whatever cultural/religious grounds on which you would base your request for a waiver.

The OP did mention 'social customs' as the second reason for not meeting. Whether or not that is strong enough to waive this requirement, I dunno.

But as you suggest, I'd pose this question in the India regional forum here and see if there are any similar experiences.

Many marriages in India are arranged in India by family members. I have met several people from India and other countries that met thru arranged marriages. None of them were prohibited from meeting or having a courtship with their fiancees after thae arrangement was made. As a metter of fact, I know of NO culture in the world that does not allow people to meet before marriage. One may exist somewhere, but I doubt if anyone knows of one.

The USCIS will see it the same way...no meeting, no visa. Dont waste you time or meney trying to get around this. People have tried and all have fialed except for a few due to severe medical conditions that prevent them from travelling to meet.

Who would want to marry someone without meeting them anyway.....that rhe WAY IT IS!!

Posted (edited)
If you guys have not met in person within the last 2 years there is no point in filing the Visa you will get denied anyway.

As I already told somebody on here,you guys should at least of met in in person before marrige,when I read things like that with ppl getting married before meeting up it does not surprise me that the US has the highest divorce rate.

You guys could look into a tourist Visa,living together for a while and seeing if you are ment to be together,I understand the religious beliefs but it makes no differance if I am katholic moslem or believe in the holy cow...meet up and see what kind of dude he is.

Are you saying that the high divorce rate in the US is because of arranged marriage? Wha? Arranged marriage in the US is the most uncommon type of marriage, and the divorce rate is high despite this fact. The divorce rates in India among people who practice the tradition of arranged marriage are waaaay lower.

But yes, getting back to the original topic, a waiver of the meeting requirement is just about impossible to get. Financial hardship will definitely not do, and convincing CIS that your culture indeeds prohibits a meeting will not be easy.

Edited by Urge To Race

03/12/2007 - Married to my beautiful wife

04/16/2007 - Sent I-130 to VSC via USPS Express Mail

05/12/2007 - NOA1 received by snail mail after a loooong wait

05/14/2007 - Sent I-129F for K3 to Chicago Lockbox via USPS Express Mail

10/22/2007 - I129F APPROVED (161 days), I130 APPROVED (188 days)

11/08/2007 - I129F received at NVC, embassy case number generated.

11/13/2007 - I129F forwarded to embassy.

11/18/2007 - 129F petition received at embassy

01/09/2008 - finally, DOS gives me the interview date, April 16, 2007 (ouch)

01/23/2008 - never got packet 4, emailed embassy

04/11/2008 - picked up packet 4, did medical

04/14/2008 - medical report pickup, no problems

04/16/2008 - interview date- APPROVED!!!!!

04/18/2008 - both of us are home at last, POE JFK!

05/21/2008 - sent AOS and EAD

05/27/2008 - received NOA1 for AOS and for EAD

06/02/2008 - received Biometrics appt letter

06/19/2008 - Biometrics appointment scheduled - DONE

06/19/2008 - both AOS and EAD touched because of biometrics

07/29/2008 - EAD approved.

05/13/2009 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!/ Card production ordered email

05/18/2009 - Welcome Letter received

06/12/2009 - Second card production ordered email

06/19/2009 - Approval notice send email

06/22/2009 - Green Card received

04/09/2012 - Applied for Citizenship by Express Mailing N400 to NBC

04/10/2012 - N400 received by USCIS

06/23/2012 - Biometrics appointment

07/27/2012 - Appointment scheduled for N400 interview

09/05/2012 - Interview passed, oath ceremony completed, and Naturalization certificate received.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Guatemala
Timeline
Posted

Cultural customs and/or religious customs are valid reasons to waive the meeting in person requirement. However it wouldn't be enough just to say "it's customary in my culture not to meet". Somehow you'd have to prove that this a valid custom where you come from and that you follow it. How are you going to do that? I have no idea! Neither do I know if they will accept it or not. But in theory if you come from a country where it's customary for future spouses not to meet before the wedding, that should be a reason to apply for a waiver.

I agree with the poster who said this is not the place to pass judgment on other people's tradition, neither if not meeting in person is the cause of the divorce rate.

APPLIED FOR NATURALIZATION 07/2021

08.01.2011 - I-751 SENT

08.05.2011 - Check cashed

08.08.2011- NOA Received

08.19.2011 - Biometrics Letter Received

09.12.2011 - Biometrics Appointment

01.27.2012 - Card production ordered

02.01.2012 - 10 year GC Received

07.25.2021 - N400 filed online

08.09.2021- Biometrics re-use notice

04.18.2022- Interview done at Minneapolis USCIS Local Office   ✔️ Received N-652 "Congratulations your application has been recommended for approval" during the interview.

05.19.2022- Oath Ceremony in MN

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted (edited)
I dont care about arranged marriges ppl can do what they want,I was talking about the divorce rates being high due to people not meeting in person and wanting to get married!

ummm, I hate to burst your lil bubble but the OP was asking to see if it is possble to get waiver to the not having met in 2 years rule.

The answer is yes, but they will need to be able to explain the situation and provide documentation that support their reason, in this case may be a letter from a religious leader with references to books that contain so said culture or religious text that helps prove and support.

If you want to talk about divorce rates and such, start a thread in the general discussion, don't try to hijack this person's thread start your own:P

Also no reason to yell, there are no embedded sounds in these forums :jest:

Ramos

Edited by ramos96

da thread killa

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Posted
I dont care about arranged marriges ppl can do what they want,I was talking about the divorce rates being high due to people not meeting in person and wanting to get married!

And I'm saying, please keep your value judgments to yourself. You also suggested they live together and try things out before marriage. That's a value judgment. I prefer to assume we are all adults and leave those judgments to the people making them.

How would you like it if I preached to you about living in sin before marriage? Sheesh!

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted

Do lots of Americans marry without having met each other first? I can't say I've ever seen that as a leading reason for divorce!

I-129F/K1

1-12-07 mailed to CSC

1-22-07 DHS cashes the I-129F check

1-23-07 NOA1 Notice Date

1-26-07 NOA1 arrives in the post

4-25-07 Touched!

4-26-07 Touched again!

5-3-07 NOA2!!! Two approval emails received at 11:36am

5-10-07 Arrived at NVC/5-14-07 Left NVC - London-bound!

5-17-07??? London receives?

5-20-07 Packet 3 mailed

5-26-07 Packet 3 received

5-29-07 Packet 3 returned, few days later than planned due to bank holiday weekend

6-06-07 Medical in London (called to schedule on May 29)

6-11-07 "Medical in file" at Embassy

6-14-07 Resent packet 3 to Embassy after hearing nothing about first try

6-22-07 DOS says "applicant now eligible for interview," ie: they enter p3 into their system

6-25-07 DOS says interview date is August 21

6-28-07 Help from our congressional representative gives us new interview date: July 6

7-06-07 Interview at 9:00 am at the London Embassy - Approved.

7-16-07 Visa delivered after 'security checks' completed

I-129F approved in 111 days; Interview 174 days from filing

Handy numbers:

NVC: (603) 334-0700 - press 1, 5; US State Department: (202) 663-1225 - press 1, 0

*Be afraid or be informed - the choice is yours.*

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...