Detained Immigrant Children Are Entitled to Hearings, Court Rules

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

1 minute ago, smilesammich said:

so snopes is only acceptable when you agree with their findings? how convenient.

But the fact remains the vast majority of cases from the ninth that are appealed to the SCOTUS are over turned . 80%  

 

In other words much like the MDL they wrong a lot, excluding the butt hurt election prediction 

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 hour ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

But the fact remains the vast majority of cases from the ninth that are appealed to the SCOTUS are over turned . 80%  

 

In other words much like the MDL they wrong a lot, excluding the butt hurt election prediction 

reread the snopes link.

[jg121783 3,921]

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

so snopes is only acceptable when you agree with their findings? how convenient.

Yeah because some weird cat lady in an apartment is the end all authority on everything.

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, jg121783 said:

Yeah because some weird cat lady in an apartment is the end all authority on everything.

maybe nb knows this weird cat lady and has found her to be trustworthy. 

 

Quote

David Mikkelson, the creator of the site, has said that the site receives more complaints of liberal bias than conservative bias, but insists that the same debunking standards are applied to all political urban legends.^[22] In 2012, FactCheck.org reviewed a sample of Snopes' responses to political rumors regarding George W. Bush, Sarah Palin, and Barack Obama, and found them to be free from bias in all cases. FactCheck noted that Barbara Mikkelson was a Canadian citizen (and thus unable to vote in US elections) and David Mikkelson was an independent who was once registered as a Republican. "You'd be hard-pressed to find two more apolitical people," David Mikkelson told them.^[22][23] In 2012, The Florida Times-Union reported that About.com's urban legends researcher found a "consistent effort to provide even-handed analyses" and that Snopes' cited sources and numerous reputable analyses of its content confirm its accuracy.^[24]

Critics of the site have falsely asserted that it is funded by businessman and philanthropist George Soros, or linked sites, but all of Snopes’s revenue is from advertising on the site.^[2] The New York Times has stated:

All of Snopes’s revenue — Mr. Mikkelson says he doesn’t know what it is — come from ads. Facebook is not paying for its services. Nor is the billionaire George Soros funding the site, although that is sometimes asserted in anti-Snopes stories.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snopes.com.

 

but you guys don't like wikipedia either. 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

1 hour ago, smilesammich said:

reread the snopes link.

Pssssst! Nb won't read any of our links,  why are you asking him to RE-read?

[smilesammich 10,727]

2 minutes ago, ccneat said:

Pssssst! Nb won't read any of our links,  why are you asking him to RE-read?

he tells me to go away, i tell him to reread..it's our shtick i guess since i ain't goin nowhere and he ain't reading 

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

48 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

he tells me to go away, i tell him to reread..it's our shtick i guess since i ain't goin nowhere and he ain't reading 

We have done this 100 times 80% of the 9ths cases that made it to the SCOTUS were over turned . It's a fact 

[smilesammich 10,727]

11 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

We have done this 100 times 80% of the 9ths cases that made it to the SCOTUS were over turned . It's a fact 

and what info are you conveniently omitting?

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

17 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

and what info are you conveniently omitting?

the problem is NB and I are playing checkers and you are playing 3 d chess

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, ccneat said:

the problem is NB and I are playing checkers and you are playing 3 d chess

checkers is so 2008.

[The Nature Boy 7,659]

36 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

and what info are you conveniently omitting?

The fact that I am constantly trying to mansplain things to you 

[smilesammich 10,727]

4 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

The fact that I am constantly trying to mansplain things to you 

your mansplaining lacks thoroughness. 

[Dashinka 25,894]

5 hours ago, smilesammich said:

your mansplaining lacks thoroughness. 

Yes, only about 0.1% of the 9th circuit decisions make it to SCOTUS.  But of course, it is only the most contentious decisions that SCOTUS agrees to hear and in 80% of those cases the 9th circuit is slapped down.

 

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

Yes, only about 0.1% of the 9th circuit decisions make it to SCOTUS.  But of course, it is only the most contentious decisions that SCOTUS agrees to hear and in 80% of those cases the 9th circuit is slapped down.

 

keep going..how does this compare to other circuits....

[Dashinka 25,894]

28 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

keep going..how does this compare to other circuits....

The latest numbers I can find show the 9th as 5th worst by percentages, but reading into the numbers more show them having the most cases reviewed of any of the other circuits and only one affirmation compared to seven reversals, so they are 1 for 7.  The four circuits ahead of them only had 2, 3 or 4 cases heard each.

 

http://www.scotusblog.com/statistics/