Deaths confirmed after Manchester Arena blast reports

[Boiler 47,510]

14 minutes ago, spookyturtle said:

Serious question. What do you suggest being done to stop the radical Islamic terrorists? Nuke all Muslim countries off the map? Round up all known Muslims in the US and execute them? Lock them up? Put them in internment camps? Ban the religion? What do you think can be done to stop the problem? 

You left out a few options, convert, pay the Jizya comes to mind.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Just now, Mr&Mrs G. said:

Ignoring the problem is not a solution, the so called Muslim ban was only going to be a delay on visa applications but it didn't take long for someone to run to a judge. Why would anyone not even want a basic extra level of security built in?

 

Not 100% but I'm not going back through every post but someone said it's not an immigration issue because the bomber was born in the UK. His parents were immigrants and after getting sorted in the UK they bought a house back in Libya and primarily stayed there so their kids had plenty of access to be converted. Also with UK citizenship they had freedom of travel back and forth. 

 

The Imam in his community said the bomber had become distant and was pro isis  and argued with the imam , no reports were made they kept it within their community. In another thread I said a lot of them choose to stay separate from our communities, they do not want to integrate.   

 

 

I didn't suggest ignoring it. I asked what can be done. 

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Just now, Boiler said:

You left out a few options, convert, pay the Jizya comes to mind.

Since you're always so vocal about the problem, why not share your ideas? 

[Mr&Mrs G. 903]

1 minute ago, spookyturtle said:

I asked what can be done. 

Depends on how much the liberals can stomach before running to a judge. 

 

No point offering solutions if a basic delay on visa's is going to be challenged.

[Boiler 47,510]

3 minutes ago, spookyturtle said:

Since you're always so vocal about the problem, why not share your ideas? 

Need more info, how much would the Jizya be for example, I would need to consider all the options available.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

2 minutes ago, Mr&Mrs G. said:

Depends on how much the liberals can stomach before running to a judge. 

 

No point offering solutions if a basic delay on visa's is going to be challenged.

I don't think it is a "liberal" problem. 

[spookyturtle 9,466]

3 minutes ago, Boiler said:

Need more info, how much would the Jizya be for example, I would need to consider all the options available.

How are you going to impose that on US citizens? 

[IAMX 3,055]

15 minutes ago, Mr&Mrs G. said:

Ignoring the problem is not a solution, the so called Muslim ban was only going to be a delay on visa applications but it didn't take long for someone to run to a judge. Why would anyone not even want a basic extra level of security built in?

 

Not 100% but I'm not going back through every post but someone said it's not an immigration issue because the bomber was born in the UK. His parents were immigrants and after getting sorted in the UK they bought a house back in Libya and primarily stayed there so their kids had plenty of access to be converted. Also with UK citizenship they had freedom of travel back and forth. 

 

The Imam in his community said the bomber had become distant and was pro isis  and argued with the imam , no reports were made they kept it within their community. In another thread I said a lot of them choose to stay separate from our communities, they do not want to integrate.   

 

 

This is 100% true, and when they segregate themselves and refuse to integrate, the left blames whitey and his privilege.

 

I wish I could live on their planet.

 

And your next post was spot-on. Trump signs EO to temporarily ban travel from a few Muslim countries while coming up with other ideas and the left go whine in court. No pleasing leftists. Wish they'd have the sense to go live in Islamic countries if they prefer not to be part of the solution.

Edited May 25, 2017 by IAMX

[Mr&Mrs G. 903]

1 minute ago, spookyturtle said:

I don't think it is a "liberal" problem. 

Well it wasn't a conservative who ran to a judge.   

[Boiler 47,510]

2 minutes ago, spookyturtle said:

How are you going to impose that on US citizens? 

I am not going to impose it on anyone, I thought you were asking me.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Just now, Boiler said:

I am not going to impose it on anyone, I thought you were asking me.

Poor deflection, but not surprising. 

[Boiler 47,510]

Just now, spookyturtle said:

Poor deflection, but not surprising. 

You expect me to impose such a call on US Citizens, seems a bit rude.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

1 minute ago, Mr&Mrs G. said:

Well it wasn't a conservative who ran to a judge.   

Since the temporary ban was Constitutional, why hasn't it been overridden? 

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Just now, Boiler said:

You expect me to impose such a call on US Citizens, seems a bit rude.

You can do better, try again. 

[Mr&Mrs G. 903]

Just now, spookyturtle said:

Since the temporary ban was Constitutional, why hasn't it been overridden? 

You would need someone more familiar with your constitution to answer that one, but they did seem to find the right judge each time they went to court.  

 

But if a basic temporary ban is going to be challenged how will any stronger measures be passed?