McConnell rejects call for special prosecutor

[Jacque67 7,328]

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell rejected calls for a special prosecutor or independent commission to investigate Russia’s election meddling in the wake of the firing of FBI Director James Comey.

[Jacque67 7,328]

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/10/mcconnell-rejects-call-for-special-prosecutor-238206

 

what's wrong with these clowns? Surely they can find the best judge money can buy???

[CaliCat 3,957]

The masks need to come off at some point. 

[Jacque67 7,328]

Eyes wide shut?

[IAMX 3,055]

Already 2 investigations going on.. with the FBI and the Senate, if the left want infinite investigations I'm sure they can use some allowance money to crowdfund for it. 

[smilesammich 10,727]

of course he does, you think mcconnell wants to wrangle trump for a full term?

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 hour ago, IAMX said:

Already 2 investigations going on.. with the FBI and the Senate, if the left want infinite investigations I'm sure they can use some allowance money to crowdfund for it. 

i say we stop paying for obama trump to go golfing every weekend. problem solved.

[JimandChristy 1,689]

Which one is Mitch McConnell?

[CaliCat 3,957]

Just now, JimandChristy said:

Which one is Mitch McConnell?

 

Apparently, the blind one. 

[smilesammich 10,727]

1 minute ago, JimandChristy said:

Which one is Mitch McConnell?

i just wanna grab those widdle cheekers and shake em, they're sooo cuuuute.

Edited May 10, 2017 by smilesammich

[Dashinka 24,596]

6 hours ago, smilesammich said:

i say we stop paying for obama trump to go golfing every weekend. problem solved.

I actually liked it when President Obama was on the golf course.  It was the best place for him.

[smilesammich 10,727]

14 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

I actually liked it when President Obama was on the golf course.  It was the best place for him.

cost us a hell of a lot less than trump's weekly golf adventures.

[Dashinka 24,596]

32 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

cost us a hell of a lot less than trump's weekly golf adventures.

I am all for cutting cost for political leaders, but I don't think everyone thinks the same way.  Why do we afford the Speaker, or Majority/Minority leaders luxury accommodations or security.  As for Trump/Pence and the various Secretaries, let them fly on a C130 with jump seats.  We can also get rid of the security details for former Presidents and First Families while we are at it.  Heck, we have a succession plan in place, no need for special protection.

Edited May 11, 2017 by Bill & Katya

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, Bill & Katya said:

I am all for cutting cost for political leaders, but I don't think everyone thinks the same way.  Why do we afford the Speaker, or Majority/Minority leaders luxury accommodations or security.  As for Trump/Pence and the various Secretaries, let them fly on a C131 with jump seats.  We can also get rid of the security details for former Presidents and First Families while we are at it.  Heck, we have a succession plan in place, no need for special protection.

my focus is pretty much on the current family dynasty and their lavish lifestyle's that the american people are supposed to prop up. there's no way in hell obama would have gotten away with hemorrhaging money the way trump and his spoiled brats do. numbers don't lie, the trump brand is expensive and thus far, we're getting a negative return. 

[Dashinka 24,596]

2 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

my focus is pretty much on the current family dynasty and their lavish lifestyle's that the american people are supposed to prop up. there's no way in hell obama would have gotten away with hemorrhaging money the way trump and his spoiled brats do. numbers don't lie, the trump brand is expensive and thus far, we're getting a negative return. 

So it is ok for one side, but not the other?  I prefer to focus on the entire picture, but I try to leave ideology out of it.