Jump to content

136 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Country: Germany
Timeline
Posted

Unbelievable; yet, true.

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/20/us/politics/jeff-sessions-judge-hawaii-pacific-island.html

 

WASHINGTON — Attorney General Jeff Sessions spoke dismissively about the State of Hawaii while criticizing a Federal District Court ruling last month that blocked the Trump administration from carrying out its ban on travel from parts of the Muslim world.

“I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the president of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and constitutional power,” Mr. Sessions said this week in an interview on “The Mark Levin Show,” a conservative talk radio program.

Mr. Sessions’s description of Hawaii, where the federal judge who issued the order, Derrick K. Watson, has his chambers, drew a rebuke from both of the United States senators who represent the state. Annexed as a territory of the United States in the late 19th century, Hawaii became the 50th state in 1959.

“Hawaii was built on the strength of diversity & immigrant experiences — including my own,” Senator Mazie Hirono, Democrat of Hawaii, wrote on Twitter. “Jeff Sessions’ comments are ignorant & dangerous.”

Posted
36 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Silly man. Thinking Hawaii is an Island in the pacfic.

Hawaii is composed of hundreds of islands

 

It's also a US State, which Sessions seems to have forgotten to mention, but is actually quite relevant when you are talking about a Judge on the "island".

Posted
2 minutes ago, bcking said:

Hawaii is composed of hundreds of islands

 

It's also a US State, which Sessions seems to have forgotten to mention, but is actually quite relevant when you are talking about a Judge on the "island".

And oddly enough it is an Island in the Pacific 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

And oddly enough it is an Island in the Pacific 

That is true, though presumably the Judge isn't actually on Hawaii the island. He is most likely in Honolulu.

 

Sessions didn't actually use the word Hawaii though. He just said an "island".

Edited by bcking
Posted
3 minutes ago, bcking said:

That is true, though presumably the Judge isn't actually on Hawaii the island. He is most likely in Honolulu.

 

Sessions didn't actually use the word Hawaii though. He just said an "island".

so basically a Judge on an Island in the Pacific issued the ruling. 

Posted

essentially, sessions is amazed there's no way to abruptly and painlessly get around the checks and balances that ensure our executive branch doesn't go absolutely crazy with power. 

Posted
Just now, Nature Boy Flair said:

so basically a Judge on an Island in the Pacific issued the ruling. 

A Federal Judge in a State issued the ruling. The fact that he happened to be on an "Island in the Pacific" is completely irrelevant. 

 

He wasn't even the only one. Washington State did as well, and didn't one other? Maryland maybe? I forget.

Posted
5 minutes ago, bcking said:

A Federal Judge in a State issued the ruling. The fact that he happened to be on an "Island in the Pacific" is completely irrelevant. 

 

He wasn't even the only one. Washington State did as well, and didn't one other? Maryland maybe? I forget.

If its irrelevant then why are you guys in a froth about it ?

Posted (edited)

Good ol' Jeffy, getting his geographics and history all messed up. It's just so complicated with the misremembering of easy stuff that is so hard, I mean he voted for the judge that makes rulings from that US State.. that also happens to be comprised of several different land masses surrounded by water, where several thousand Americans died defending their state and country. Oh well. Surely he wouldn't want anyone to make disparaging oopsie misremembering comments about his Alabama would he?

 

Edited by yuna628

Our Journey Timeline  - Immigration and the Health Exchange Price of Love in the UK Thinking of Returning to UK?

 

First met: 12/31/04 - Engaged: 9/24/09
Filed I-129F: 10/4/14 - Packet received: 10/7/14
NOA 1 email + ARN assigned: 10/10/14 (hard copy 10/17/14)
Touched on website (fixed?): 12/9/14 - Poked USCIS: 4/1/15
NOA 2 email: 5/4/15 (hard copy 5/11/15)
Sent to NVC: 5/8/15 - NVC received + #'s assigned: 5/15/15 (estimated)
NVC sent: 5/19/15 - London received/ready: 5/26/15
Packet 3: 5/28/15 - Medical: 6/16/15
Poked London 7/1/15 - Packet 4: 7/2/15
Interview: 7/30/15 - Approved!
AP + Issued 8/3/15 - Visa in hand (depot): 8/6/15
POE: 8/27/15

Wedding: 9/30/15

Filed I-485, I-131, I-765: 11/7/15

Packet received: 11/9/15

NOA 1 txt/email: 11/15/15 - NOA 1 hardcopy: 11/19/15

Bio: 12/9/15

EAD + AP approved: 1/25/16 - EAD received: 2/1/16

RFE for USCIS inability to read vax instructions: 5/21/16 (no e-notification & not sent from local office!)

RFE response sent: 6/7/16 - RFE response received 6/9/16

AOS approved/card in production: 6/13/16  

NOA 2 hardcopy + card sent 6/17/16

Green Card received: 6/18/16

USCIS 120 day reminder notice: 2/22/18

Filed I-751: 5/2/18 - Packet received: 5/4/18

NOA 1:  5/29/18 (12 mo ext) 8/13/18 (18 mo ext)  - Bio: 6/27/18

Transferred: Potomac Service Center 3/26/19

Approved/New Card Produced status: 4/25/19 - NOA2 hardcopy 4/29/19

10yr Green Card Received: 5/2/19 with error >_<

N400 : 7/16/23 - Oath : 10/19/23

 

 

 

Country:
Timeline
Posted
15 minutes ago, bcking said:

That is true, though presumably the Judge isn't actually on Hawaii the island. He is most likely in Honolulu.

 

Sessions didn't actually use the word Hawaii though. He just said an "island".

lol. 

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

If its irrelevant then why are you guys in a froth about it ?

In what way are we in a "froth"? Talk about overly dramatic.

 

We are just pointing out that when you are talking about a Federal Judge using their constitutionally appointed power to put a check on the other branches of government, it is more relevant to mention that they are a judge from a State. The fact that the judge is on an island is meaningless. If he was from Alaska would Sessions have said "A judge from a cold, snowy, isolated area"?

 

What do you think was Session's point for stating he is on an island in the Pacific, as opposed to just saying a District Judge or a Federal Judge in a single state, or even a Federal Judge in Hawaii?

 

If I had to guess I would say he was trying to emphasize the fact that the Judge is very far away, and therefore question whether his opinion is relevant. His opinion is just as relevant as any other District Judge. 

Edited by bcking
Country:
Timeline
Posted
9 minutes ago, bcking said:

In what way are we in a "froth"? Talk about overly dramatic.

 

We are just pointing out that when you are talking about a Federal Judge using their constitutionally appointed power to put a check on the other branches of government, it is more relevant to mention that they are a judge from a State. The fact that the judge is on an island is meaningless. If he was from Alaska would Sessions have said "A judge from a cold, snowy, isolated area"?

 

What do you think was Session's point for stating he is on an island in the Pacific, as opposed to just saying a District Judge or a Federal Judge in a single state, or even a Federal Judge in Hawaii?

 

If I had to guess I would say he was trying to emphasize the fact that the Judge is very far away, and therefore question whether his opinion is relevant. His opinion is just as relevant as any other District Judge. 

Projection of the day award goes to.. ;)

Posted
29 minutes ago, yuna628 said:

Good ol' Jeffy, getting his geographics and history all messed up. It's just so complicated with the misremembering of easy stuff that is so hard, I mean he voted for the judge that makes rulings from that US State.. that also happens to be comprised of several different land masses surrounded by water, where several thousand Americans died defending their state and country. Oh well. Surely he wouldn't want anyone to make disparaging oopsie misremembering comments about his Alabama would he?

 

so the judge did not make a ruling from an Island in the Pacific ?  

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...