Anti-immigrant party takes first place in Sweden, poll shows

[IAMX 3,055]

5 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

islam isn't special. religious freedom is whats special. wax on wax off.

 

fyi, your premise that christians have had to adapt while islam is considered 'special' is completely flawed. this is a christian nation after all, and you better not forget it.

 

Yet these western nations are having problems with Islam and not Christianity. 

 

I mean, unless you consider a Christian baker potentially saying he doesn't want to make a cake with two homosexual people on it to be more important than the rapes and murders occurring in these countries at the behest of Islamic refugees.

 

Hell, even in Muslim neighborhoods of London, tolerance central, go out and exercise your right to express support for homosexuality or gays marrying. At minimum you get harassed. If this happened by Christians it would be worldwide news by every single leftist media outlet, and those like yourself would be taking up torches and pitchforks. Instead, Muslims are given special treatment and liberals are silent, if not abet this behavior by turning around and attacking everything else their brains can conceive of because.. uh, reasons.

 

This is why the left narrative is running on deaf ears now. Even cucked Sweden will turn around soon and grow tired of it.

[IAMX 3,055]

2 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

yeah, where do refugees come from in the first place. could it be..policies/war/drones carried out by christian leaders? isn't america a christian nation? that's what i've been told. anyway my question is why would you focus on an entire religion and not the people "immigrating" (love how you speak of immigrants and refugees interchangeably). like, how is it easier to eradicate an entire religion over individuals accused of wrong doing?

These refugees come from Islamic countries that flat out don't give a #######. And accepting immigrants is fine, but if they're causing problems, they either need to shape up or gtfo. Pretty simple. I don't care what ####### their home country does to them if they're making countries they move to miserable and refuse to integrate with the values the place they move to holds. Never worth it.

Edited March 27, 2017 by SRVT

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, SRVT said:

Yet these western nations are having problems with Islam and not Christianity. 

 

I mean, unless you consider a Christian baker potentially saying he doesn't want to make a cake with two homosexual people on it to be more important than the rapes and murders occurring in these countries at the behest of Islamic refugees.

 

Hell, even in Muslim neighborhoods of London, tolerance central, go out and exercise your right to express support for homosexuality or gays marrying. At minimum you get harassed. If this happened by Christians it would be worldwide news by every single leftist media outlet, and those like yourself would be taking up torches and pitchforks. Instead, Muslims are given special treatment and liberals are silent, if not abet this behavior by turning around and attacking everything else their brains can conceive of because.. uh, reasons.

 

This is why the left narrative is running on deaf ears now. Even cucked Sweden will turn around soon and grow tired of it.

if we're strictly talking sweden, why are you bringing up cakes. 

 

don't get me started on christians screaming victim. 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

 

7 minutes ago, SRVT said:

Well, this thread is about Sweden and their immigrant issues. Where are the immigrants coming from? Massive red herring. Why would I focus on Hindus or Buddhists or Christians when they clearly aren't the problem here? 

 

 

The original post was about the growth of anti immigrant views.  Those views are aligned to the hyper nationalism which have brought war, violence and even genocide in previous times.  If these actions remain part of a peaceful dialog then we just debate the risks and merits of having immigrants.  But that is not really what the folks behind these groups want.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

1 minute ago, smilesammich said:

if we're strictly talking sweden, why are you bringing up cakes. 

 

don't get me started on christians screaming victim. 

Sweds have very good cakes

[smilesammich 10,727]

Just now, SRVT said:

These refugees come from Islamic countries that flat out don't give a #######. And accepting immigrants is fine, but if they're causing problems, they either need to shape up or gtfo. Pretty simple. I don't care what ####### their home country does to them if they're making countries they move to miserable and refuse to integrate with the values the place they move to holds. Never worth it.

i think you should maybe do some research on refugees, where they come from, where they go, and what countries harbor the majority. seems like you're operating off of bad intel.

[IAMX 3,055]

Just now, smilesammich said:

if we're strictly talking sweden, why are you bringing up cakes. 

 

don't get me started on christians screaming victim. 

You mean the Christians ethnically cleansed Muslim countries? Hell, in those countries even being the wrong kind of Muslim means ethnic cleansing, just ask the Yazidis. 

 

Silly people screaming victim.

 

And you wonder why your views are being ignored by the electorates? For people who try to portray yourselves as intellectuals, this thought process is anything but.

[IAMX 3,055]

4 minutes ago, ccneat said:

 

The original post was about the growth of anti immigrant views.  Those views are aligned to the hyper nationalism which have brought war, violence and even genocide in previous times.  If these actions remain part of a peaceful dialog then we just debate the risks and merits of having immigrants.  But that is not really what the folks behind these groups want.

The idea behind this was conservatism.. globalist conservatism. Remember George Bush? Tony Blair? They wanted open borders. It didn't start from liberal generosity. Liberals simply placate to the worst of these people, whether it be dangerous refugees, or dangerous immigrants in general.

Edited March 27, 2017 by SRVT

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

2 minutes ago, SRVT said:

The idea behind this was conservatism.. globalist conservatism. Remember George Bush? Tony Blair? They wanted open borders. It didn't start from liberal generosity. Liberals simply placate to the worst of these people, whether it be dangerous refugees, or dangerous immigrants in general.

so now I am confused, let me play this back. 

 

Conservatives want to screw up the world for some sort of conspiracy?

Liberals want to keep the world screwed up because they are overly generous?

[smilesammich 10,727]

no, i was responding to your comment:

 

Quote

Hell, even in Muslim neighborhoods of London, tolerance central, go out and exercise your right to express support for homosexuality or gays marrying. At minimum you get harassed. If this happened by Christians it would be worldwide news by every single leftist media outlet, and those like yourself would be taking up torches and pitchforks. Instead, Muslims are given special treatment and liberals are silent, if not abet this behavior by turning around and attacking everything else their brains can conceive of because.. uh, reasons.

 

christanity gets special treatment in this country, not islam. part in bold is false.

 

 

[smilesammich 10,727]

7 minutes ago, SRVT said:

The idea behind this was conservatism.. globalist conservatism. Remember George Bush? Tony Blair? They wanted open borders. It didn't start from liberal generosity. Liberals simply placate to the worst of these people, whether it be dangerous refugees, or dangerous immigrants in general.

what a crock. gb and tb did not want open borders.

 

liberals placate to the humanity in all people. turrible.

[IAMX 3,055]

1 minute ago, smilesammich said:

no, i was responding to your comment:

 

christanity gets special treatment in this country, not islam. part in bold is false.

 

 

Nah. Religions are treated equally in the US.

 

In fact they were treated equally in Sweden too. However, one political group decided "equal" means every time Muslim does something, detract with something about some other religion, the same type of political sophistry you employ. Hence why a bunch of "feminists" go to an Islamic country cucking themselves to a country and their mandated religion that subjugates women. But yet again, no liberal outrage. 

[IAMX 3,055]

8 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

what a crock. gb and tb did not want open borders.

 

liberals placate to the humanity in all people. turrible.

You're free to believe what you want, clearly you and reality are at odds with one another

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2004/apr/16/20040416-120211-3587r/

Quote

 

On Jan. 7, Mr. Bush proposed a guest-worker program that would, among other provisions, give perpetual temporary legal status to workers already in the United States. Mr. Bush says his plan doesn’t amount to an amnesty, but Mr. Tancredo said that’s how those in other countries see it.

“The rest of the world knows exactly what he said. A Mexican peasant in Chiapas interpreted it correctly,” he said.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3466485/How-Blair-cynically-let-two-million-migrants-Explosive-biography-reveals-PM-s-conspiracy-silence-immigration-debate.html

Tony Blair presided over a silent conspiracy to change the face of Britain for ever with mass immigration, an explosive book reveals.

He ordered his Labour government never to discuss in public the supposed ‘advantages’ of the unprecedented influx.

But behind the scenes ministers were instructed to wave tens of thousands of asylum seekers into the UK under cover of their being ‘economic migrants’. 

 

Enjoy.

Edited March 27, 2017 by SRVT

[ready4ONE 5,400]

3 hours ago, SRVT said:

Better tell that to all the pet rock news sources throughout Europe that actually report when this stuff happens. 

 

Or you can ask yourself why your supposedly fantastic news sources either refuse to cover it, or spin it with red herrings like you guys do with garbage innuendo about racism and Islamophobia.

 

There's a good reason why conventional news sources are dying out. Their lack of reliability speaks for itself. The fact that right-leaning populist movements have been encompassing much of refugee-saturated countries in that region has nothing to do with their news sources (in fact if they were sycophants of news sources like The Guardian, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, etc. they'd be pulling the same thing liberal Swedes have been trying while violence erupts all over their country), but carry on with the narrative.

Donald Trump, Infowars, and pet rocks. Very eclectic news sources you have going there. The kinds of sources that lead their believers to yammer on about terrorist attacks in London, Sweden. A very dangerous place, don't recommend going there.

[Boiler 47,510]

Edited March 27, 2017 by Boiler