Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

DOJ: Requiring warrant for cell phone tracking would 'cripple' law enforcement

4 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China

Source: http://blogs.computerworld.com/20137/doj_requiring_warrant_for_cell_phone_tracking_would_cripple_law_enforcement

If your mobile phone is on then it is constantly pinging cell phone network towers, leaving you no choice about revealing your location. The ACLU warned the "threat to personal privacy presented by this technology is breathtaking," especially since the "government is routinely violating American's privacy rights through warrantless cell phone tracking." Apparently any mobile phone privacy is too much privacy in the early stages of an investigation, before law enforcement actually has any proof that a person has done anything illegal. An Obama administration official told a congressional panel that requiring a search warrant to obtain cell phone location tracking information would "cripple" law enforcement and prosecutors.

Now that the Supreme Court decided a warrant is necessary before attaching a GPS to a person's vehicle, warrantless location tracking via a person's cell phone is the surveillance method of choice for law enforcement. Jason Weinstein, deputy assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's criminal division, discussed the need for such warrantless cell phone tracking so it won't "cripple" the government at "State of the Mobile Net," a conference for the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee. It was the DOJ that also argued in favor of warrantless GPS tracking in United States v. Jones.

But the Fourth Amendment grants us a "reasonable expectation of privacy" and the world as we know it didn't end when the Supreme Court ruled that GPS tracking required a warrant. Greg Nojeim, senior counsel at the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT), told the same congressional panel that "not one justice accepted the Department of Justice's argument in that case. It got zero votes. We're all here, the criminals are not taking over the country."

So now wireless carriers are only too happy to hand out our location data without requiring a warrant; selling cell phone surveillance records is a big money-making business for mobile phone companies that have special divisions and manuals to assist law enforcement in nabbing our info. The wireless industry is not transparency-friendly and mobile carrier companies do not want to report the number of times location info is disclosed, contested, or the number of users whose location data was handed over to Johnny Law. In fact, according to the Wireless Association (CTIA), a wireless trade association that includes AT&T, Verizon and Sprint, the proposed reporting requirements "unduly burden wireless providers and their employees, who are working day and night to assist law enforcement to ensure the public's safety and to save lives." The EFF bluntly pointed out that the wireless industry is "working day and night" to sell you out in secret.

Weinstein told the Congressional Internet Caucus Advisory Committee the DOJ tells law enforcement to obtain a search warrant when tracking a phone's GPS or "precise locational information," yet that requirement can vary. "There really is no fairness and no justice when the law applies differently to different people depending on which courthouse you're sitting in," he said. "For that reason alone, we think Congress should clarify the legal standard."

On the other hand, if the purpose of accessing accounts is to solve crimes and catch criminals, is there any fairness or justice if law enforcement gobbles up mobile device location information without any probable cause? If it's not clear there is illegal activity, is that not somewhat like a fishing expedition in murky water when law enforcement tries to find some suspicious dirt prior to obtaining a warrant? Senator Ron Wyden still believes in our Fourth Amendment rights and a reasonable expectation of privacy since he proposed the GPS Act, meaning law enforcement would be required to acquire a search warrant to access location information.

More warrantless surveillance in the USA is not what this country needs. In fact, as the EFF put it, the DOJ thinks "any privacy protection is too much privacy protection for cell phone tracking." As for Weinstein's comment about the need for a warrant "crippling" prosecutors and law enforcement, if warrantless cell phone location tracking continues it will cripple the privacy of We the People.

The EFF reported:

Requiring the police to obtain a search warrant -- the traditional method for balancing law enforcement needs with individual privacy -- and demanding the wireless industry be transparent about how they deal with law enforcement requests for location information are critical steps in the right direction, towards "fairness" and "justice," location privacy and transparency.

Below is the video if you would like to see the portion of "State of the Mobile Net" that dealt with "Location Tracking by the Government After Jones: What Jones Tells Us About Mobile Phone and App Tracking."

You might find Weinstein's comments to be an eye-opener about your ISP or wireless carrier happily selling your privacy for commercial gain. Only a small number of people need to worry about law enforcement accessing their account data, he said, but "100% of cell phone and Internet users need to worry about how providers are using their information." To which CDT's Nojeim jumped in and said not to change the subject as the focus of the panel was "law enforcement access to location information."

it would be great that police officers cannot abuse their surveillance powers!

"Family time is very precious and you should cherish every moment of it."

01/20/12 - I-130 sent to Chicago Lockbox.

01/26/12 - NOA1 received and processing at Vermont.

06/28/12 - NOA2 announced on status check.

06/29/12 - NVC received case learned on 07/2/12.

06/30/12 - Hard copy NOA2 received.

07/09/12 - NVC Casefile Number and IIN Issued.

07/16/12 - Receive and Sent DS-3032 via email.

07/17/12 - Mailed DS-3032 via mail, AOS bill received via email, paid online, Optin email sent.

07/18/12 - Optin accepted and new case number, AOS marked paid, emailed AOS packet.

07/24/12 - Assigned as Agent, IV Fee bill received via email, paid online.

07/25/12 - IV Fee marked paid, emailed IV packet.

07/31/12 - Emailed GZO Supplemental Packet 3.

08/02/12 - Case completed and commenced final review.

08/03/12 - Shipped all copies of forms/letters/documents to my wife - arriving on 8/9/12.

08/06/12 - Case completed final review.

08/09/12 - Appointment letter received via email interview date set 9/6/12.

08/14/12 - Medical exam done.

08/15/12 - Medical exam results all normal.

09/06/12 - Submitted required documents at the embassy and interview set next day at 0730.

09/07/12 - Visa approved, click here for review http://www.visajourney.com/reviews/view-dos-cis-reviews.php?entry=10401 .

09/14/12 - Visa received on hand!

10/07/12 - Arrived at NYC! click here for review http://www.visajourney.com/reviews/view-poe-reviews.php?entry=15293

10/20/12 - Received welcome letter from USCIS.

10/25/12 - Green Card received!

"Nothing is more difficult than the art of maneuvering for advantageous positions." - Sun-Tzu

04/27/13 - Submitted DS-160 online for parent-in-laws and sister-in-law.

05/01/13 - Paid DS-160 or MRV Fee Payments on CGI Stanley.

05/03/13 - Made appointment for 05/16/13 on CGI Stanley.

05/16/13 - Arrived at GUZ and impromptu notice on the front it was closed.

05/30/13 - B2 visa interview passed! Read review here http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/433263-b2-visa-was-approved-for-parentinlaw/ <p>

"Good ideas are not adopted automatically. They must be driven into practice with courageous patience." - ADM Hyman G. Rickover

08/08/14 - Mailed I-175 application.

08/11/14 - I-175 arrived at VSC.

08/18/14 - Received NOA1 with date 08/12/14.

08/27/14 - Received biometrics appointment for 09/09/14.

02/27/15 - GC in production from email notification.

03/02/15 - Received NOA2 with approval dated 02/25/15.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada

Good. Make them crippled in doing their job. Let the PIGS squirm a little.


The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
  • Create New...