Jump to content
^_^

From IQ to mental illness, how prenatal life affects the brain

15 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline
Posted

It was on the cover of The New York Times Book Review. And the cover of Time Magazine. Suddenly, the obscure science of “fetal origins” is getting popular, in the pages of a new book called “Origins: How the Nine Months Before Birth Shape the Rest of Our Lives.”

Written by science journalist Annie Murphy Paul, "Origins" explores the still-murky but growing research into how the environment in the womb can affect a baby’s life ever after -- including the life of the mind. A few questions for the author:

Q; In "Origins," you describe myriad ways that the prenatal environment appears to influence the fetus. What do we know about the effects of the womb on the brain?

A: Fetal origins is very much an emerging science, so we know less than we would like about the effects of the prenatal environment on the brain. We do know, of course, that the brain is formed during the nine months of gestation, and that a number of influences during this period--chemical exposures, stress, depression, drug and alcohol use, nutrition--can have effects on the brain, showing up in things like measures of neural conduction speed, tests of cognitive ability, and IQ scores.

Q: Many pregnant women worry that their own emotional state, particularly stress, will affect the fetus. How would you sum up the findings on that?

A: The findings on the effects of prenatal stress are twofold. It's fairly well established that traumatic stress--severe, life-threatening stress, like that experienced in a natural disaster or war--is associated with a higher risk of premature delivery, low birth weight, and in some studies, birth defects. Chronic stresses like those associated with poverty and discrimination may also have deleterious effects. Moderate stress, however--the everyday hassles experienced by your typical working woman or woman caring for other children--actually appears to accelerate fetal brain development, leading to faster neural conduction speed as infants and higher scores on tests of cognitive ability as toddlers.

Q: And what is known about the possible origins of mental illness in the womb?

A: A number of studies on different populations suggests that severe prenatal stress or malnutrition, particularly in the first trimester of pregnancy, is associated with a higher risk of schizophrenia among offspring. Higher rates of this mental illness have been found, for example, in individuals whose mothers were pregnant during the Nazi siege of Holland during World War II, during the famine that followed China’s “Great Leap Forward,” and during the Arab-Israeli War of 1967. A more speculative theory is that women's own mental states of depression or anxiety affect the offspring's own likelihood of developing mental illness, perhaps through the effects of the stress hormone cortisol. Dr. Catherine Monk at Columbia University is doing fascinating work, measuring the responses to stress exhibited by fetuses of depressed and non-depressed women. She believes that intrauterine conditions may be a "third way" that mental illness is passed down in families, along with genes and parenting behaviors.

Q: One fascinating theory suggests that the womb may be the arena of a fight between the fetus's heart and its brain for resources. How does that work?

A: A theory originally put forth by British physician David Barker (and long known as "the Barker hypothesis") proposes that when a fetus receives insufficient nutrition, it will "make the best of a bad job" by diverting most of the nutrients it does receive to the organ most critical to its survival: the brain. This act of triage allows it to survive to be born and perhaps even grow into middle age--but at some point the early deprivation experienced by the heart and other organs shows up in increased rates of heart disease and other illnesses.

Q: You mention that the prenatal environment may account for something like 20% of IQ. Really? And how best can we make smarter babies?

A: To be more precise, a study published in Nature by researcher Bernard Devlin and his coauthors found that in their analysis of twin studies of IQ, the intrauterine environment accounted for 20 percent of IQ similarity between twins, and genes for only 34 percent. Devlin's point was that in drawing conclusions from such studies (which were used to buttress the assertions in the book "The Bell Curve," for example), we must take into account not only genes and childhood environment, but also the very FIRST environment that twins share: the womb.

In terms of making smarter babies, the best advice to pregnant women is to eat a wholesome diet, refrain from drinking alcohol and using drugs, protect yourself from environmental toxins, and try to alleviate excessive stress. There's some preliminary evidence that physical exercise by the pregnant woman may promote offspring's

intelligence, and it can't hurt. But forget about playing Mozart to the fetus and other "prenatal education" products--they won't increase intelligence and may even be harmful.

Q: There's also a theory that links the prenatal environment and homosexuality. How would that work?

A: It's a well-established finding that homosexual men are more likely to have older brothers. The theory--and it's still speculative--is that the body of a woman carrying a male child generates antibodies in response to her fetus which stay on in her body after she gives birth. When she becomes pregnant again with another male child, those

antibodies affect the developing brain of the fetus in ways that incline the offspring towards homosexuality. It's an intriguing theory but one that needs a lot more substantiation.

Q: What do you say to mothers who protest that "fetal origins" research is just more reason for even more maternal guilt?

A: I would say, first: I totally sympathize. I was pregnant when I researched and reported "Origins," and I had to work through a lot of my own anxiety and guilt. What I came to realize is that the science of fetal origins is growing so rapidly that we are only going to hear more and more about how prenatal conditions affect later health and well-being--so we need to find a more positive and productive way of thinking and talking about these findings, one that neither dismisses them out of hand nor makes us crazy with worry. I also found the excitement and optimism of the fetal-origins researchers I talked to rather contagious: they see pregnancy as a scientific frontier, a

wonderful new opportunity to head off public health problems like obesity and diabetes. So I came, over the months that I was writing "Origins," to see pregnancy in that light--as a physical, emotional, and intellectual adventure.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=brain-from-womb-to-tomb

Posted

Q: What do you say to mothers who protest that "fetal origins" research is just more reason for even more maternal guilt?

This is one of the reasons we are childfree (and plan to stay that way). There are not enough hours in one lifetime for me to research, sort through, and carry out all the myriad of things that I should/could be doing to promote my child's best growth/education...etc. And I know I would just go absolutely insane trying to do it, only to find out 6 months in a new study which says I should have done something completely different 3 months ago etc.

K-1:

January 28, 2009: NOA1

June 4, 2009: Interview - APPROVED!!!

October 11, 2009: Wedding

AOS:

December 23, 2009: NOA1!

January 22, 2010: Bogus RFE corrected through congressional inquiry "EAD waiting on biometrics only" Read about it here.

March 15, 2010: AOS interview - RFE for I-693 vaccination supplement - CS signed part 6!

March 27, 2010: Green Card recieved

ROC:

March 1, 2012: Mailed ROC package

March 7, 2012: Tracking says "notice left"...after a phone call to post office.

More detailed time line in profile.

Filed: Other Country: India
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Having a baby is hard work, but it doesn't have to be extreme hard work. It's something happening all over the world all the time, babies being born and raised. When you have a child, they are a part of you for life and some things come naturally. Some things you plan don't happen anyway and it's fine. You don't need to spend hour upon hour researching things (unless someone wants to) or feel guilt if you can follow this part of advice about smarter babies, though I'd say it applies to healthy babies in general:

"In terms of making smarter babies, the best advice to pregnant women is to eat a wholesome diet, refrain from drinking alcohol and using drugs, protect yourself from environmental toxins, and try to alleviate excessive stress. " Oh and prenatal vitamins.

The worst critics of mothers during motherhood are not scientists or researchers, but fellow moms! :lol:

Edited by chri'stina

Married since 9-18-04(All K1 visa & GC details in timeline.)

Ishu tum he mere Prabhu:::Jesus you are my Lord

Posted

I was told that eating lots of muffins would produce a genius, so I'm going with that.

K-1

March 7, 2005: I-129F NOA1

September 20, 2005: K-1 Interview in London. Visa received shortly thereafter.

AOS

December 30, 2005: I-485 received by USCIS

May 5, 2006: Interview at Phoenix district office. Approval pending FBI background check clearance. AOS finally approved almost two years later: February 14, 2008.

Received 10-year green card February 28, 2008

Your Humble Advice Columnist, Joyce

Come check out the most happenin' thread on VJ: Dear Joyce

Click here to see me visiting with my homebodies.

[The grooviest signature you've ever seen is under construction!]

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
I was told that eating lots of muffins would produce a genius, so I'm going with that.
English muffins, verily man?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted

English muffins, verily man?

English, blueberry, chocolate chip...

K-1

March 7, 2005: I-129F NOA1

September 20, 2005: K-1 Interview in London. Visa received shortly thereafter.

AOS

December 30, 2005: I-485 received by USCIS

May 5, 2006: Interview at Phoenix district office. Approval pending FBI background check clearance. AOS finally approved almost two years later: February 14, 2008.

Received 10-year green card February 28, 2008

Your Humble Advice Columnist, Joyce

Come check out the most happenin' thread on VJ: Dear Joyce

Click here to see me visiting with my homebodies.

[The grooviest signature you've ever seen is under construction!]

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

I was told that eating lots of muffins would produce a genius, so I'm going with that.

and too many muffins turns one into a muffin top...

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

Muffins are good, as long as they're not corn muffins. Corn muffins are evil.

especially with real butter on them....

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted

Corn muffins don't need butter for them to be evil and disgusting. Yuck!

we'll tempt you with land o lakes honey butter on them then. :devil:

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted

and too many muffins turns one into a muffin top...

Not on this svelte physique. :unsure:

Mmmm...corn muffins. With buddah.

K-1

March 7, 2005: I-129F NOA1

September 20, 2005: K-1 Interview in London. Visa received shortly thereafter.

AOS

December 30, 2005: I-485 received by USCIS

May 5, 2006: Interview at Phoenix district office. Approval pending FBI background check clearance. AOS finally approved almost two years later: February 14, 2008.

Received 10-year green card February 28, 2008

Your Humble Advice Columnist, Joyce

Come check out the most happenin' thread on VJ: Dear Joyce

Click here to see me visiting with my homebodies.

[The grooviest signature you've ever seen is under construction!]

Posted

Not on this svelte physique. :unsure:

Mmmm...corn muffins. With buddah.

Dang, we had chili for dinner lastnight, I should have made corn muffins. Not sure if Nik's had those yet. :-/

K-1:

January 28, 2009: NOA1

June 4, 2009: Interview - APPROVED!!!

October 11, 2009: Wedding

AOS:

December 23, 2009: NOA1!

January 22, 2010: Bogus RFE corrected through congressional inquiry "EAD waiting on biometrics only" Read about it here.

March 15, 2010: AOS interview - RFE for I-693 vaccination supplement - CS signed part 6!

March 27, 2010: Green Card recieved

ROC:

March 1, 2012: Mailed ROC package

March 7, 2012: Tracking says "notice left"...after a phone call to post office.

More detailed time line in profile.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...