What's with all this sex talk?

[IndigoSkies 168]

Maybe I am an old fashioned person...I don't know, but I cringe alittle when I see married people openly over- the- top flirting and disclosing stuff about themselves on here. I mean it's open to the whole world. Why do some people think the rest of he world is even interested in wether you get some or if you are wearing thongs or not? Who cares? Most of those that do this are [nearly] middle aged and married. Save it for your spose....Or at least leave something to the imagination.....jeez.

It's classless and icky to even have that advertised about yourself....ugh.

Go on call me a prude......That's OK that you think that.....No need for me to even try and state otherwise because I am not advertising myself.

I agree you. You aren't old-fashioned. You're perfectly fine for not giving into this stupid make-everything-about sex culture. These hypersexual morons even make foodstuff into object of sex. And if you ever point it out, they question your sexuality, your virility, etc. When one questions your sexuality, the others sort of gather around him or her and form a horde. You can see that again and again here on the board. If one person, post something about what catalyzed a person to critcise sex obsession, his other minions will scream and holler in support.

You aren't a prude. You're more civilised about this than these children are.

[Peikko 1,575]

Maybe I am an old fashioned person...I don't know, but I cringe alittle when I see married people openly over- the- top flirting and disclosing stuff about themselves on here. I mean it's open to the whole world. Why do some people think the rest of he world is even interested in wether you get some or if you are wearing thongs or not? Who cares? Most of those that do this are [nearly] middle aged and married. Save it for your spouse....Or at least leave something to the imagination.....jeez.

It's classless and icky to even have that advertised about yourself....ugh.

Go on call me a prude......That's OK that you think that.....No need for me to even try and state otherwise because I am not advertising myself.

What kind of reading comprehension fail is this post anyway? Or is it simply that you think people are discussing their personal habits without actually having read any of the threads? You know like those Christians that burn books they haven't read?

I never inferred nor implied to you that I am saying anything about values and ethics. Relax yourself! Just wondered why so many threads on the same thing.

I am saying that the threads ARE about values and ethics - period. None of the threads cover the same ground (except the bickering which is universal). How is 4 'so many' again?

Edited July 29, 2010 by Madame Cleo

[tmma 467]

What kind of reading comprehension fail is this post anyway? Or is it simply that you think people are discussing their personal habits without actually having read any of the threads? You know like those Christians that burn books they haven't read?

None of the threads cover the same ground (except the bickering which is universal). How is that 'so many' again?

I don't suffer from reading comprehension failure. I didn't read the threads in question because I have no desire to read about people's sexual prefences, opinions, underwear or whatever like that.

I find it unusual that someone as well educated as you seem to be, Cleo, fails to get my point. Hope I clarified for you. let me know if I need to simplify futher.

PS .There have been lots more threads than simply the threads you have been engaged in. Just so you know. It's not all about you.

Edited July 29, 2010 by tmma

[Ban Hammer 14,295]

I don't care that you *think* that. lol

[slim 1,533]

To be fair, slim, I was not correcting Indigo's misspelling of "nauseam," but my good friend Rob's:

Twice in one day I've misquoted. Guess I'll have to go 9999 X 2 now.

However, I did throw you a softball with the opportunity to correct the misspelling (hint: 1st declension accusative) and you might have missed.

When you said mistake I didn't go back and look at the original. When I replied to your post with the "nauseum" in it, I took that as nom. case which would also be same as acc. for that misspelled word.

You are correct in that nausea would be nauseam in acc. Different words, different endings.

Where is all the research that points in that direction? Oh, that's right, facts are facts and you just know them. Sorry Slim but I do not take anything you say seriously - and the more you say, the less rationale you sound - in my opinion of course.

Give me your opinion on something else.

How long have you been here? In that time, has America gotten better or gotten worse?

[IndigoSkies 168]

@tmma, don't even bother. Most people think they're clever and/or funny if they talk about sex. They think they are being oh so avant-garde and riské if they can reveal just a little bit more about their own sex life. It's like when we were in high school. If someone said something a bit riské, everyone would over their face and go all wooooooooooooohooooooooo and admire the moron. It’s all a popularity contest. For you and me, we can do nothing more than to ignore this.

[HAL 9000 96]

This thread would be better served by a list of posters and what their positions are in their sex lives.

[Fandango 1,440]

I am saying that the threads ARE about values and ethics - period. None of the threads cover the same ground (except the bickering which is universal). How is 4 'so many' again?

In this regard, it just is curious to me as to why you're so interested in how others view sex. And 4 on the same topic to me does seem excessive. What answers are you so desperately seeking?

______________________

As to Tmma's posts, +1000000. ITA. I truly don't get it either *shrug*. Maybe we are prudes, who knows?

[Ban Hammer 14,295]

As to Tmma's posts, +1000000. ITA. I truly don't get it either *shrug*. Maybe we are prudes, who knows?

i won't dare say. i like having my nads and windpipe attached to my body.

[HAL 9000 96]

I myself am put off (not necessarily grossed out) by ridiculously obvious shows of eroticism in public. But really... its none of my business.

[Fandango 1,440]

MC, like why do you care how men bang their bishops? I find it such an odd question to ask!

[Peikko 1,575]

I don't suffer from reading comprehension failure. I didn't read the threads in question because I have no desire to read about people's sexual prefences, opinions, underwear or whatever like that.

I find it unusual that someone as well educated as you seem to be, Cleo, fails to get my point. Hope I clarified for you. let me know if I need to simplify futher.

PS .There have been lots more threads than simply the threads you have been engaged in. Just so you know. It's not all about you.

Of course it isn't all about me, I am not silly enough to think that it is but I haven't seen any threads in OT where people have given personal information of that nature of course I do not read every thread.

Perhaps you could let me know how you know what is in a thread you haven't read? That's a skill I do not have

MC, like why do you care how men bang their bishops? I find it such an odd question to ask!

why do I care what enhancements men use when they masturbate? I don't really do euphemisms so I am not quite sure what you are saying here.

[Fandango 1,440]

why do I care what enhancements men use when they masturbate? I don't really do euphemisms so I am not quite sure what you are saying here.

I call bullsh!t. But ok, I'll play along. Why do you care whether a man masturbates while he's away from his SO, and whether he watches porn, or doesn't? Like really, what value does that give you, AND would you ask that question to a bunch of men irl?

[Peikko 1,575]

In this regard, it just is curious to me as to why you're so interested in how others view sex. And 4 on the same topic to me does seem excessive. What answers are you so desperately seeking?

______________________

As to Tmma's posts, +1000000. ITA. I truly don't get it either *shrug*. Maybe we are prudes, who knows?

Why are you interested in how others view abortion? Ethics is fascinating. I am interested in how people justify some behaviours but not others particularly if those behaviours appear contradictory. What is so odd about that? The questions I asked were very specific but I think you know that - it's almost as if you want my interest to be somehow evidence that perhaps I am 'not getting enough' or something equally pathetic - surely that's not your intent is it? I am not 'desperately seeking' anything. Really Ms Bunny, no cheap shots, tut tut.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

I think this thread would benefit from more Latin.

odi et amo. quare id faciam, fortasse requiris?

nescio, sed fieri sentio et excrucior.

I myself am put off (not necessarily grossed out) by ridiculously obvious shows of eroticism in public.

Excellent. Post those swim pics then.