Jump to content

11 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted

This is no more different than Muslims buying up a small township and installing Shariah law. Or Jews doing the same thing or anyone else doing the same. This is a slippery slope to creating a parallel judicial system in America that is not allowed by the Constitution, the Supreme law of the land. Nothing shall trample on it. Not even Chinese eel merchants. Only the police should have the power to detain people with reasonable cause. Not some old Chinese hag trying to protect his kumquats.

N400 CITIZENSHIP STAGE

23-DEC-2016 -:- N400 form mailed to Dallas, TX Lockbox (USPS EXPRESS)

27-DEC-2016 -:- N400 form delivered/picked up by USCIS

01-JAN-2017 -:- N400 form fee check cashed by USCIS

04-JAN-2017 -:- N400 form received per NOA1

09-JAN-2017 -:- N400 form NOA1 notice date

14-JAN-2017 -:- N400 form NOA1 on hand through USPS

30-JAN-2017 -:- N400 fingerprint taken

01-FEB-2017 -:- N400 interview schedule process started

26-JUL-2017 -:- N400 interview date set (01SEP2017)

29-JUL-2017 -:- N400 interview letter on hand

01-SEP-2017 -:- N400 interview date - Interview passed

10-OCT-2017-:- N400 oath ceremony letter on hand (oath on 26OCT2017)

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline
Posted (edited)

This is no more different than Muslims buying up a small township and installing Shariah law. Or Jews doing the same thing or anyone else doing the same. This is a slippery slope to creating a parallel judicial system in America that is not allowed by the Constitution, the Supreme law of the land. Nothing shall trample on it. Not even Chinese eel merchants. Only the police should have the power to detain people with reasonable cause. Not some old Chinese hag trying to protect his kumquats.

You enter private property and steal something the owners have a right to hold you. Besides, US law still protects you. For instance if I was accused of stealing I would want the police there and I wouldn't comply with the store's demands.

If they posted my name etc. and I hadn't been charged I would sue them for defamation.

Edited by Sousuke
Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I've worked in retail stores that did something similar. Whoever was caught, would have a Polaroid picture taken with the item they stole and pinned on a wall, but it was not displayed in a public area.

Edited by El Buscador
Posted

I've worked in retail stores that did something similar. Whoever was caught, would have a Polaroid picture taken with the item they stole and pinned on a wall, but it was not displayed in a public area.

there's a chinese restaurant we order from sometimes that does a similar thing with bad checks. they don't take debit or credit cards, but will take checks, and all the bad checks they've received they have posted on the wall. anyone up at the counter waiting to pay their bill or pick up their takeout can see who's check is up there. i don't see writing a bad check as being any different from stealing really, as long as it's not a bank error issue or something.

I-love-Muslims-SH.gif

c00c42aa-2fb9-4dfa-a6ca-61fb8426b4f4_zps

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Russia
Timeline
Posted

You enter private property and steal something the owners have a right to hold you. Besides, US law still protects you. For instance if I was accused of stealing I would want the police there and I wouldn't comply with the store's demands.

If they posted my name etc. and I hadn't been charged I would sue them for defamation.

They have a right to hold you but only until the police get their. If they don't intend to call the police, they are guilty of kidnapping. Also, they can't seize your ID or even force you to show it. Taking a picture is very shaky ground.

I support store owners stopping shoplifters and calling police. I think part of the problem is that when the police do arrive, they may not take a hard enough stance. When the police arrive and the shoplifter has his day in court and the charges hold up, I think the storeowner has a right to demand compensation.

Stores, however, also have responsibility for falsely accusing people.

Filed: Other Country: Afghanistan
Timeline
Posted (edited)

They have a right to hold you but only until the police get their. If they don't intend to call the police, they are guilty of kidnapping. Also, they can't seize your ID or even force you to show it. Taking a picture is very shaky ground.

I support store owners stopping shoplifters and calling police. I think part of the problem is that when the police do arrive, they may not take a hard enough stance. When the police arrive and the shoplifter has his day in court and the charges hold up, I think the storeowner has a right to demand compensation.

Stores, however, also have responsibility for falsely accusing people.

Right. You don't have to comply with any of their demands other than remaining in the store. If people do so, they do it voluntarily to avoid a misdemeanor. At least that's my take.

(Though I suspect many in the communities don't fully understand their rights)

Edited by Sousuke
Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted (edited)

I used to manage the liquor dept. of a retail store chain and I watched a guy casually walk up to a cheap $5 bottle of vodka and walk right towards the exit. We were not suppose to apprehend shoplifters so all we could do was follow him to his car and ask him for the bottle back. He obliged, but had he refused, all we could do was to take his license plate number down and call the cops.

Edited by El Buscador
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted

^ That was the same for us when I worked retail. All I could do was go up to them and ask them publicly to pay for the item or return it.

I remember one guy stole a bag of chips and the owners daughter saw him take them and he was eating them at the deli next door. I had to go over there and ask him if he paid for the bag of chips. It publicly shamed him and he paid for the bag of chips right then. Then he had to talk to my store owner and the deli manager about what he'd done to make it right.

If people stole and left before I could speak to them then we wrote their license plate down and reported it to the store owner who handled it from there. A lot of the customers were regulars as it was the neighborhood store so he was sometimes sensitive to them giving them a chance first to come clean and make it right in order to keep their business and the community business.

paDvm8.png0sD7m8.png

mRhYm8.png8tham8.png

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

JC Penney a few years ago was one of the few companies who would still chase people out into the parking lot and tackle them if necessary.

Personally I like what these stores are doing. If you're protecting your property, go for it. They've got video evidence and they're offering an alternative to a permanent legal record. :thumbs:

nfrsig.jpg

The Great Canadian to Texas Transfer Timeline:

2/22/2010 - I-129F Packet Mailed

2/24/2010 - Packet Delivered to VSC

2/26/2010 - VSC Cashed Filing Fee

3/04/2010 - NOA1 Received!

8/14/2010 - Touched!

10/04/2010 - NOA2 Received!

10/25/2010 - Packet 3 Received!

02/07/2011 - Medical!

03/15/2011 - Interview in Montreal! - Approved!!!

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

^ That was the same for us when I worked retail. All I could do was go up to them and ask them publicly to pay for the item or return it.

I remember one guy stole a bag of chips and the owners daughter saw him take them and he was eating them at the deli next door. I had to go over there and ask him if he paid for the bag of chips. It publicly shamed him and he paid for the bag of chips right then. Then he had to talk to my store owner and the deli manager about what he'd done to make it right.

If people stole and left before I could speak to them then we wrote their license plate down and reported it to the store owner who handled it from there. A lot of the customers were regulars as it was the neighborhood store so he was sometimes sensitive to them giving them a chance first to come clean and make it right in order to keep their business and the community business.

Yeah - it gets tricky when its a regular shopper who spends hundred of dollars every month because you don't want to lose their business.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...