Jump to content

7 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

Hi,

I'm brand new to VJ so please excuse me if this question has been asked already! I've been reading the guides and FAQs for the K-1 visa and the initial I-129F forms very thoroughly, and noticed that VJ suggests including proof on an ongoing relationship in the initial package, even though it's not strictly required. I'm wondering if people who have done (and haven't done) this can weigh in with their experiences providing this info upfront. I have no problem providing proof of the relationship, I'm just wondering if it really does help, and how much to provide with the I-129F application.

Thanks so much in advance!!

Summer 1997 - met for the first time :)

04/2010 - reunited

12/18/09 - engaged

01/14/10 - I-129F mailed to CSC

01/19/10 - I-129F NOA1

02/22/10 - I-129F NOA2

03/01/10 - NVC sent along to Montreal embassy

03/09/10 - Embassy mailed packet 3

03/10/10 - Called NVC, spoke to an operator, received case number, verification of delivery to MTL

03/11/10 - Packet 3 Received from MTL embassy

03/19/10 - Packet 3 Mailed in

04/12/10 - Medical in Toronto

04/12/10 - Packet 3 Logged

04/23/10 - Packet 4 Received

06/11/10 - Interview Date! - Passed!

06/18/10 - Receive visa

07/14/10 - Enter USA

07/30/10 - Wedding Day

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline
Posted
Hi,

I'm brand new to VJ so please excuse me if this question has been asked already! I've been reading the guides and FAQs for the K-1 visa and the initial I-129F forms very thoroughly, and noticed that VJ suggests including proof on an ongoing relationship in the initial package, even though it's not strictly required. I'm wondering if people who have done (and haven't done) this can weigh in with their experiences providing this info upfront. I have no problem providing proof of the relationship, I'm just wondering if it really does help, and how much to provide with the I-129F application.

Thanks so much in advance!!

I think it is always a good idea to provide as much proof of relationship as you can up-front and not give any of the agencies an opportunity to deny your case due to lack of such evidence. Remember, there are so-to-say easy consulates that may not require much proof, but there are others (such as Delhi consulate) that will look for any excuse to deny your case. So assess or ask around the "stingy-factor" of your consulate and go accordingly.

It is generally a good idea to err on the side of more information than the lack of it.

Good Luck!

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Welcome to VJ! :thumbs:

Your very good and intelligent question has indeed been discussed here. The act of including relationship evidence with an initial petition is called "front-loading."

In short, USCIS (with whom you file the I-129F petition) does not care whether you include relationship evidence. However, once the petition is approved and it reaches the consular stage, it can be a wholly different matter. "Easy" consulates (Canada is likely one -- see the regional forum for Canada) will accept relationship evidence that is brought to the visa interview. "#######" consulates (many in Africa & Asia, and some in Central & South America) can refuse to accept evidence that is brought to the interview, and in fact, consular officers can throw interviewees out of the interview for "insufficient evidence of relationship." This has happened.

An attorney who is a member of VJ, Marc Ellis (member name, Ellis-Island), reasons that if USCIS has seen evidence of a relationship in an initial petition before sending it to an embassy or consulate, the embassy or consulate cannot deny the existence of that evidence. For this reason, it does not hurt for a petitioner to include relationship evidence with the initial I-129F (or K-3, or CR-1) filing, and it could greatly help, or indeed prove to be quite crucial.

Go to the top of any screen here on VJ, click "Reviews: Embassy," and select "Ecuador" to read some true horror stories. Then, go to the regional forum for Canada, introduce yourself, listen to the experienced members there, and be thankful that you are dealing with a largely reasonable consulate.

You're obviously thoughtful and literate, which makes you a valuable and valued member of VJ. Again, welcome!

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Posted (edited)
Hi,

I'm brand new to VJ so please excuse me if this question has been asked already! I've been reading the guides and FAQs for the K-1 visa and the initial I-129F forms very thoroughly, and noticed that VJ suggests including proof on an ongoing relationship in the initial package, even though it's not strictly required. I'm wondering if people who have done (and haven't done) this can weigh in with their experiences providing this info upfront. I have no problem providing proof of the relationship, I'm just wondering if it really does help, and how much to provide with the I-129F application.

Thanks so much in advance!!

Some embassy's [or COs] seem not to be paying much attention to evidence people have been bringing to their interview and have already made their decision from the evidence submitted with the initial petition so people are "front loading" a lot more.

Used to be people only submitted enough evidence they had met in person in the last 2 years and submitted proof of having a bonafide relationship at their interview.. That seems to be changing. Especially for Vietnam.

Edited by Dakine

K1 denied, K3/K4, CR-1/CR-2, AOS, ROC, Adoption, US citizenship and dual citizenship

!! ALL PAU!

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline
Posted

thank you so much for the replies! I'm amazed by how helpful the VJ members are! Can't wait until the process is done and I can pay it forward.

:D

Summer 1997 - met for the first time :)

04/2010 - reunited

12/18/09 - engaged

01/14/10 - I-129F mailed to CSC

01/19/10 - I-129F NOA1

02/22/10 - I-129F NOA2

03/01/10 - NVC sent along to Montreal embassy

03/09/10 - Embassy mailed packet 3

03/10/10 - Called NVC, spoke to an operator, received case number, verification of delivery to MTL

03/11/10 - Packet 3 Received from MTL embassy

03/19/10 - Packet 3 Mailed in

04/12/10 - Medical in Toronto

04/12/10 - Packet 3 Logged

04/23/10 - Packet 4 Received

06/11/10 - Interview Date! - Passed!

06/18/10 - Receive visa

07/14/10 - Enter USA

07/30/10 - Wedding Day

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline
Posted
thank you so much for the replies! I'm amazed by how helpful the VJ members are! Can't wait until the process is done and I can pay it forward.

:D

I am surprised that it wasn't prevously mentioned. The K1 application is for a Visa for marriage within 90 days of

entry. So if there isn't any evidence of a relationship, then why would you be requesting the government for

a visa so you 2 can get married?

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Posted
I am surprised that it wasn't prevously mentioned. The K1 application is for a Visa for marriage within 90 days of

entry. So if there isn't any evidence of a relationship, then why would you be requesting the government for

a visa so you 2 can get married?

:huh:

"Every one of us bears within himself the possibilty of all passions, all destinies of life in all its forms. Nothing human is foreign to us" - Edward G. Robinson.

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...