Notice Of Decision from USCIS

[loggingoof 0]

Last week my husband got this mail from the USCIS:

NOTICE OF DECISION

This notice is in reference to the Form I-129F, Petition for an Alien Fiancé. Filed for **********, pursuant to Section 101 (a) (15) (K) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended. The petition was approved on July 8, 2008 and was forwarded abroad to a United States Embassy ? Consulate with a validity period of four months. Subsequently, the petition has been returned to to the United Stats Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) with a finding that the beneficiary was not issued the requested K-3 visa. Since the period of validity has now expired, the petition will not be revalidated. Therefore, in accordance with 8 C.F.R. 214.2(K) (5), all USCIS action on this petition is concluded as of the date of this notice. However, the petitioner may choose to file a new Form I-129F, Petition for an Alien Fiancé, for the beneficiary.

Christina Poulos

Director

Does anyone received a letter? U.S Embassy denied our case last Feb. 24, 2009 after 5 months under AR. It was said THE PETITIONER HAS NO PETITIONABLE RELATIONSHIP TO THE BENEFICIARY. Case been sent back to USCIS and on status online they got both I-129F and I-130 it last MAY with request from DOS to review.

We got the Congressman and senator involved but until now we haven't heard anything from the yet.

We are now confused what to do. What we are expecting is the NOIR or NOID but instead we got this.

Does anyone has an idea what will happen to I-130 since we heard nothing about it yet.

Suggestions are highly appreciated.

Edited September 11, 2009 by bill_leneS

[pushbrk 13,610]

Last week my husband got this mail from the USCIS:

NOTICE OF DECISION

This notice is in reference to the Form I-129F, Petition for an Alien Fiancé. Filed for **********, pursuant to Section 101 (a) (15) (K) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended. The petition was approved on July 8, 2008 and was forwarded abroad to a United States Embassy ? Consulate with a validity period of four months. Subsequently, the petition has been returned to to the United Stats Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) with a finding that the beneficiary was not issued the requested K-3 visa. Since the period of validity has now expired, the petition will not be revalidated. Therefore, in accordance with 8 C.F.R. 214.2(K) (5), all USCIS action on this petition is concluded as of the date of this notice. However, the petitioner may choose to file a new Form I-129F, Petition for an Alien Fiancé, for the beneficiary.

Christina Poulos

Director

Does anyone received a letter? U.S Embassy denied our case last Feb. 24, 2009 after 5 months under AR. It was said THE PETITIONER HAS NO PETITIONABLE RELATIONSHIP TO THE BENEFICIARY. Case been sent back to USCIS and on status online they got both I-129F and I-130 it last MAY with request from DOS to review.

We got the Congressman and senator involved but until now we haven't heard anything from the yet.

We are now confused what to do. What we are expecting is the NOIR or NOID but instead we got this.

Does anyone has an idea what will happen to I-130 since we heard nothing about it yet.

Suggestions are highly appreciated.

Yes, this is the letter nearly all California cases get when a Consulate sends them back the case. Since this is K3, and you have an approved I-130, I would examine whether the problems can be corrected and then pursue the CR1 visa with the appropriate evidence and preparation to be successful.

[saaheb 0]

I received exactly the same NOD from USCIS when my I129F was returned for revocation. They never told us any reason for denial. The embassy even lost the mail and so we never received

the original documents back that were submitted at the time of interview.

Now, after getting married recently I am starting the process all over again. Filed I 130, K3 and now keeping my fingers crossed!

[NigeriaorBust 4,087]

California always expires the 129f , What happened to the 130 ? You should be able to get it restarted.

[Kathryn41 3,205]

It is a violation of the Terms of Service for Visa Journey to make personal insults against VJ members. Comment violating TOS has been removed