Cheap Girlfriend

[Peikko 1,575]

If he has had a vasectomy he can have that right. Otherwise, if you have sex and don't protect yourself you have to live with whatever consequences arise which includes 'unwanted' children.

"You" the man? Or "you" both people? It takes two, you know.

Protection takes two? What do you mean by that? If the girl doesn't consent to your using a condom, don't have sex or have a vasectomy so that this doesn't ever come up as an issue. It's not rocket science to not concieve a child.

"I'm on the pill, don't worry about it"

If you truly do not want to be financially responsible for a child then no, that should never cut it.

[tom&tata 2]

But if a child is conceived, then both parties are responsible, yes?

Yes, both parties need to be responsible. But one should not decide for other.

[Dr. Obvious 49]

But if a child is conceived, then both parties are responsible, yes?

Yes, both parties need to be responsible. But one should not decide for other.

But that is the unfairness of biology coming into play. Nature dicates that after conception only the woman can make the final decision about the fate of the pregnancy.

[Sister Fracas 5]

how did we get here?

[mawilson 2,133]

But if a child is conceived, then both parties are responsible, yes?

Yes, both parties need to be responsible. But one should not decide for other.

But that is the unfairness of biology coming into play. Nature dicates that after conception only the woman can make the final decision about the fate of the pregnancy.

Nature doesn't dictate that. The Supreme Court does.

[Peikko 1,575]

The conception to a man who doesn't want to be financially responsible to a child should never happen. If you are so concerned about it, then take steps to avoid it HAVE A VASECTAMY. Post conception "I don't want the responsibility" is too bad, so sad.

[Dr. Obvious 49]

But if a child is conceived, then both parties are responsible, yes?

Yes, both parties need to be responsible. But one should not decide for other.

But that is the unfairness of biology coming into play. Nature dicates that after conception only the woman can make the final decision about the fate of the pregnancy.

Nature doesn't dictate that. The Supreme Court does.

Not as long as their are coathangers, stairs, and punches in the gut. Beyond that, we could always take a trip back in time when either killing or selling your unwanted born children into slavery was a commonly accepted form of abortion. There are some test runs on eBay already...

[almaty 19]

how did we get here?

hmmmm...i do not know....started out funny and ended up...well, Brother MA

[Ban Hammer 14,569]

how did we get here?

i'm still reading the map

[onwa 6]

What bothers me is the fact that even if the man wants the child, but the woman wants to get an abortion, he has no say. That's not right.

[Dr. Obvious 49]

What bothers me is the fact that even if the man wants the child, but the woman wants to get an abortion, he has no say. That's not right.

You are right, it is not fair, but biology just isn't fair. It isn't fair that a woman is forced to either terminate the pregnancy or birth the child and the man doesn't have to bear any physical burden or consequences of either of those decisions, but that is life. That is biology.

[SteveLaura 0]

If ever a thread needed a picture of ducks, it's this one.

Ooh, cute kitty too.

[jom 4]

If ever a thread needed a picture of ducks, it's this one.

Ooh, cute kitty too.

This too Same ducks I guess

Edited May 30, 2008 by jom

[Mina76 0]

how did we get here?

i'm still reading the map

[Mina76 0]

If ever a thread needed a picture of ducks, it's this one.

Ooh, cute kitty too.

awwwww!