Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
no name

Flawed Cindy McCain has a grudge list

37 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

John and Cindy McCain: the former beauty queen became addicted to painkillers she took for a spinal problem

ON almost every step of his march towards the Republican nomination, John McCain has relied on the support of his glamorous second wife Cindy. Yet she has not always been a political asset. A Republican victory in November would bring to the White House a formidable but flawed first lady.

McCain’s marriage has long attracted attention both for the 18-year age gap between husband and wife and for their adopted Asian daughter, who became the focus of one of the most vicious dirty tricks of the 2000 presidential campaign.

The couple have also overcome daunting health problems that included McCain’s bouts with skin cancer, a stroke suffered by Cindy in 2004, and her admission a decade earlier that she had become so addicted to painkillers that she was stealing them from a medical charity she ran.

Yet somehow the McCains have emerged as a potent and durable political partnership. Cindy McCain was at her husband’s side last week as he celebrated the Florida primary victory that has put him at the front of the Republican field.

A former Arizona rodeo beauty queen and daughter of a millionaire Phoenix businessman, Cindy McCain was 25 when she met her future husband at a cocktail party in Hawaii. John McCain was a 43-year-old naval liaison officer travelling with a congressional delegation, his sights already set on a political career.

He was also still married to his first wife Carol, although the couple had recently separated. Carol later attributed the breakdown of the marriage to “John turning 40 and wanting to be 25 again”. McCain fell like a brick for Cindy, who was the heir to a brewery distribution business worth millions. For several years afterwards the McCains endured Washington gossip that he had dumped his first wife - who had been crippled in a car accident - in favour of a trophy bride to enhance his political ambitions.

It was in the late 1980s, after a series of miscarriages and giving birth to three children, that Cindy developed spinal problems and was prescribed painkillers after surgery. Her husband and family had no idea she was secretly taking pills stolen from a charity she had created called the American Voluntary Medical Team, which sent mobile surgical units to war zones. When federal agents began to investigate gaps in the charity’s records, Cindy telephoned her husband, a senator in Washington, and confessed.

She admitted at the time that the 1994 episode had “nearly destroyed both of us”. But she underwent treatment and attended meetings of Narcotics Anonymous as part of a deal with prosecutors who dropped charges.

A few years earlier she had visited Bangladesh with a different charity and decided on the spur of the moment to help a little girl with a cleft palate whom she met in Mother Teresa’s orphanage.

The McCains eventually adopted the girl, named her Bridget and raised her as their daughter. She is now 16, but during McCain’s ugly presidential primary fight against George W Bush in 2000, voters in South Carolina began receiving telephone calls suggesting the senator had fathered an illegitimate black child.

The authors of the smear have never been identified, but Bush was the beneficiary and went on to win the South Carolina primary and the Republican nomination. The McCains have never publicly blamed Bush and their relations have been outwardly cordial. But Cindy recently admitted that she keeps a “grudge list”.

Cindy McCain, now 53, claims she has no interest in policy making - “I am not the legislator in this family. He is” - and that she intends to keep busy running her charities and her family’s company. As first lady, it is clear that she would play a key role. Acknowledging that McCain had made many enemies in Republican ranks, she added: “The only person my husband can trust is me.”

link

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
John and Cindy McCain: the former beauty queen became addicted to painkillers she took for a spinal problem

ON almost every step of his march towards the Republican nomination, John McCain has relied on the support of his glamorous second wife Cindy. Yet she has not always been a political asset. A Republican victory in November would bring to the White House a formidable but flawed first lady.

McCain’s marriage has long attracted attention both for the 18-year age gap between husband and wife and for their adopted Asian daughter, who became the focus of one of the most vicious dirty tricks of the 2000 presidential campaign.

The couple have also overcome daunting health problems that included McCain’s bouts with skin cancer, a stroke suffered by Cindy in 2004, and her admission a decade earlier that she had become so addicted to painkillers that she was stealing them from a medical charity she ran.

Yet somehow the McCains have emerged as a potent and durable political partnership. Cindy McCain was at her husband’s side last week as he celebrated the Florida primary victory that has put him at the front of the Republican field.

A former Arizona rodeo beauty queen and daughter of a millionaire Phoenix businessman, Cindy McCain was 25 when she met her future husband at a cocktail party in Hawaii. John McCain was a 43-year-old naval liaison officer travelling with a congressional delegation, his sights already set on a political career.

He was also still married to his first wife Carol, although the couple had recently separated. Carol later attributed the breakdown of the marriage to “John turning 40 and wanting to be 25 again”. McCain fell like a brick for Cindy, who was the heir to a brewery distribution business worth millions. For several years afterwards the McCains endured Washington gossip that he had dumped his first wife - who had been crippled in a car accident - in favour of a trophy bride to enhance his political ambitions.

It was in the late 1980s, after a series of miscarriages and giving birth to three children, that Cindy developed spinal problems and was prescribed painkillers after surgery. Her husband and family had no idea she was secretly taking pills stolen from a charity she had created called the American Voluntary Medical Team, which sent mobile surgical units to war zones. When federal agents began to investigate gaps in the charity’s records, Cindy telephoned her husband, a senator in Washington, and confessed.

She admitted at the time that the 1994 episode had “nearly destroyed both of us”. But she underwent treatment and attended meetings of Narcotics Anonymous as part of a deal with prosecutors who dropped charges.

A few years earlier she had visited Bangladesh with a different charity and decided on the spur of the moment to help a little girl with a cleft palate whom she met in Mother Teresa’s orphanage.

The McCains eventually adopted the girl, named her Bridget and raised her as their daughter. She is now 16, but during McCain’s ugly presidential primary fight against George W Bush in 2000, voters in South Carolina began receiving telephone calls suggesting the senator had fathered an illegitimate black child.

The authors of the smear have never been identified, but Bush was the beneficiary and went on to win the South Carolina primary and the Republican nomination. The McCains have never publicly blamed Bush and their relations have been outwardly cordial. But Cindy recently admitted that she keeps a “grudge list”.

Cindy McCain, now 53, claims she has no interest in policy making - “I am not the legislator in this family. He is” - and that she intends to keep busy running her charities and her family’s company. As first lady, it is clear that she would play a key role. Acknowledging that McCain had made many enemies in Republican ranks, she added: “The only person my husband can trust is me.”

link

Oh thank god it's just stolen drugs and revenge, I thought you were going to tell me she believes in astrology like Nancy R.... phew! :lol:


miss_me_yet.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
It looks like the dems can swift boat with the best of them.

it's not swiftboating if the dems do it :bonk::lol:


* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well, since Ciny McCain's grudges reference something the Republicans did in 2000 I'm not sure it's about the Democrats

It's the fact that it's brought out now. It's meant to embarrass McCain before an election. It's something that the dems say the reps do when in reality both sides do it. It's called politics.

It looks like the dems can swift boat with the best of them.

it's not swiftboating if the dems do it :bonk::lol:

Yeah I know. I forgot the double standard factor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline
It's the fact that it's brought out now. It's meant to embarrass McCain before an election.

What the Republican primary? I didn't realize McCain had won the nomination already - I jsut checked the calendar and it says February not November


tb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's the fact that it's brought out now. It's meant to embarrass McCain before an election.

What the Republican primary? I didn't realize McCain had won the nomination already - I jsut checked the calendar and it says February not November

McCain is the candidate best able to beat Hillary or Obama. It makes sense that they would do what they can to see that he isn't the nominee.

Edited by GaryC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline
It's the fact that it's brought out now. It's meant to embarrass McCain before an election.

What the Republican primary? I didn't realize McCain had won the nomination already - I jsut checked the calendar and it says February not November

McCain is the candidate best able to beat Hillary or Obama. It makes sense that they would do what they can to see that he isn't the nominee.

I'm not sure I follow this logic in a newspaper profile of a candidate's wife.

The fact is, nothing the Democrats have done to McCain even comes close to the way his own party treated him during the South Carolina primary in 2000, which was positively shameful.


tb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Before you blame the Dems, you might want to note the source. :whistle:

I saw that. It wouldn't be the first time a story was put in a overseas newspaper to influence an American election. It's called deniability.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You do realize that the times of London is owned by Rupert Murdoch? I'm not sure he's part of the Democratic machine....

Yes I do. But I also know he doesn't clear every story printed. Look, I don't give a damn about McCain. He isn't someone I want to be president. But to deny that stories like this are not meant to influence elections is just lying to yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Timeline
You do realize that the times of London is owned by Rupert Murdoch? I'm not sure he's part of the Democratic machine....

Yes I do. But I also know he doesn't clear every story printed. Look, I don't give a damn about McCain. He isn't someone I want to be president. But to deny that stories like this are not meant to influence elections is just lying to yourself.

So...the times is printing a profile of cindy McCain because Barack Obama is clearing the stories that are printed? Because Rupert let James Carville take over as editor? Or maybe because, since the McCain candidacy is doing well, Times editors thought it might be interesting to do a piece of the potential first lady?


tb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...