iwannaplay54

I am wondering - did the original I-485 include both income and asset information?

Any USC can show intent to return and sponsor their family.

I opened one with Ally. Not only is it possible, it took about 10 minutes to do it.

Friend of mine just bought a house in Portugal for that reason.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/tony-schwartz-trump-resign_us_59952d91e4b06ef724d64fd6 This your source?

This story and the guy who claimed to have been taken and returned after his "tour" was covered on an episode of "Hanger 1" on the history channel awhile back.

Seems he has had self-control problems for awhile. This was no stable, quiet, law-abiding citizen who got mad and snapped a few days ago. In April 2006, Hodgkinson was arrested for battery, domestic battery and discharging a firearm, after he allegedly physically assaulted his foster daughter and two of her friends. A St Clair County sheriff’s department incident report said Hodgkinson threw his daughter around a room, pulled her hair and hit her. He then punched a female friend of his daughter in the face “with a closed fist” and struck the woman’s boyfriend in the head with the stock of his shotgun, before firing a round as the man ran away. One day earlier, according to a separate police report, Hodgkinson had badly damaged a wooden bedroom door in a neighbour’s home while searching for his daughter. All the charges were later dismissed. Almost a decade earlier, another foster daughter living with Hodgkinson and his wife, Suzanne, had killed herself at the age of 17, according to the Belleville News-Democrat. The daughter, Wanda Ashley Stock, doused herself with gasoline and set herself on fire inside a car.

How did that feel? Lay off of peaceful, legal, responsible gun owners and focus on the problem (individual) next time.

Seems to be one of those "spray and pray" types. We all know one.

DV = automatic loss of right to own / possess. In addition to states not participating in the mental illness reporting system these charges are not followed up on either.

An argument could be made that inciting violence does not fall under the classification of protected free speech, just as laws restricting gun ownership have been tested and found to not violate the 2nd amendment. It floors me that in nearly every single case where this happens it seems that the laws are neither applied nor enforced. This guy should have NOT been holding or owning or carrying a gun under existing laws - so where is the accountability for failure to enforce?

Nothing like turning a tragedy into an opportunity for political capital

Looks like crossing criminal history with voter registration records might be a good start

Yep No wonder you're so defensive. Might as well take a deep breath, shoulder up, and own this dude.

Hate? LOL............ A few people here share his views but I am not one of them. I'm an objective observer on this one. Nothing in common. It is (always) fun watching dem/libs struggle to slap the "angry white right-wing male" label on one of their own. I doubt any of them will follow up with any self-reflection about it so the standard default will be to attack whoever brings it up.