Gary and Alla

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

Someone is being a fed a line of BS. Most likely YOU. Possibly US.
If the visa was denied she cannot interview again. The petition will be sent back to USCIS and you will be notified of the official reason for denial. It will NOT be because you are ugly.
some possibilities...
1. You are making this up for fun
2. She is making it up because she does no twant to marry you, did not go to the interview and is feeding you BS
If you are not making this up, then you may want to check with the consulate and see if she even showed up for her interview

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/america-richest-poorest-states-042117509.html
The majority of the economic growth since the recession has benefitted the wealthy. In general people earn less money than in 2008, adjusted for inflation. Misissippi is still the poorest state. Mississippi still has the highest rate of childhood and adult obesity. The good news is, that in America, the poorest people are the most overweight. More people than ever on government assistance. Highest percentage of people on food stamps in history. Lowest workforce participation since 1977. Unemployment rate only as low as 7.5% because 1/3 of eligible workers have abandoned looking for work. and no longer can collect unemployment.
What we really need is a government shut down.

You are a fountain of information on the subject Harpa. I have been a voting member of the NRA for 40 years and this is the first I heard this discription. I have voted in every BoD election since 1973, and never heard this. Amazing!
If it were true it would be fine with me, I need little provocation to buy firearms. And I am in favor of capitalism and business in general. Century International Arms in Georgia, VT is running 3 shifts to keep up with demand the the "American Kalashnikov" It is good for our economy. Remington, S&W and Ruger's stocks are soaring. Why is it bad for gun manufacturers to promote buying their products but it is not bad for, say, Apple to come out with a new I-phone every 6 months? Is the Consumer Electronics Assn just about selling products? This nonsense is 2 clicks higher than the "my ####### is big enough I do not need a gun" nonsense. I will give you that.
This is why I choose not to discuss this topic. For one, it is a right and it will not be "talked away". Second, the opposition is so full of uninformed boobs that it is impossible to have an actual discussion. Most of the idiots immediately go to the size of various body organs they claim to possess, or ask why we cannot have concealed thermo-nuclear weapons. Some attempt to act like they know something and say things like "sear failure" or talk about how their friends can make unregistered machine guns from scrap metal and a file and some instructions they bought out of "Popular Mechanics"..only, well, not really. Some of these idiots carry concealed ,32 auto handguns for "protection from bears." Yeah, it was actually stated as the reason an anti-gun person has a concealed carry permit. Faced with a bear, they plan to shoot their companions in the knee and run! Some make their own guns...well, not really.They will, but they need to order the parts. From "Popular Mechanics" maybe? They know nothing about guns except what some op-ed feeds them. They don't even know whatthe current gun laws ARE...they just know we need MORE of them!
Just not interesting for me.
They have no idea how to answer a Canadian on how our system works, what our rights are as Americans, or WHY it is this way. "So we do not have a photo of a QUEEN 3000 miles away on our money" may be understandable...not sure though.
Why would I even bother with such nonsense? No need. We will take care of the subject with legislation and litigation. Works for me. Don't care if it pleases anyone else.
there will be no new Federal gun laws.

Americans. NRA members, of which I have been a life member involved in legislative issues for nearly 40 years. WE. Me and my posse, are not going to let pansies who cannot answer questions about US freedoms take them awy from US.
If you don't like it... it makes me happy.
There will be no new gun control laws. WE made sure of that last fall.

Open carry is retarded.
The benefit of allowing people to carry handguns is multiplied by NOT knowing who is doing so.
Vermont allows open carry in addition to concealed carry. It is very rare to see anyone carrying a handgun openly, though no one would be particularly alarmed by it. I have seen it, I have never seen anyone that gives a ####### about it, but it is not very clever.

The shooter took Biden's advice.
The government should take Wayne Lapierre's.
It was a good man with a gun that eneded the situation (as always) but he was 12 people late. Rather than count how many minutes he was late, we can instead use the "people count". This makes the miltary a little better than Sandy Hook, CT where the good guys with guns were 20 people late. The sooner you get the good guys there with guns in a "gun free" zone, the sooner the situation ends. Or never begins.
In any case, there will be no new gun control laws. The government can take pro-active, effective steps to prevent this...or it can sit by as congress does nothing. Fortunately, in this case no one needs legislation which will never be forth coming, it could be done by executive order. Obama should ask Putin if it is OK.

Once the divorce is final...no problem. You do not even need a waiver if it is your 2nd K-1 and it is more than 2 years from the approval of the first K-1.
The divorce MUSt be final and you MUST be free to marry BEFORE you send your I-129f petition and a copy of the final divorce must be attached to the petition.
Also, and just to be complete in my answer, make SURE your current fiancee KNOWS about your previous foreign spouse. She will be asked about it at some point in the process. If you have not been up front about it with her...do so now.
ALSO
If your former wife is not a US citizen and has not left the USA, you will still have to claim her on the I-134 and I-864. She will still count as part of your family size. Divorce does not end your liability under the I-864

Because it is not about "hate" or protecting anyone, it is about power and control.
I am not going to debate the issue with anyone, there is no need to. Settled law. There will be no new federal firearms laws from this incident or any other. I will tell you why. You do not need to like the reasons or even agree with me, you are free to be WRONG, but I will explain why there will be NO NEW GUN LAWS. I am not going to debate idiots who know nothing about the issue, guns or the politics involved because there is no need to. You will lose and that is fine with me.
Here is why the subject of gun control will not be discussed in congress or by Obama after Monday's shooting at the Navy Yard (it has already faded out of the news)
1. The shooter is BLACK. If no action came after the mass shootings perpetrated by WHITE shooters and suddenly now Congress passes legislation after a BLACK shooter kills many people, it will be seen as racist. Especially universal background checks which will impact blacks more than whites. The accusation will be "You let WHITE people get away with it, but let a BLACK shooter kill WHITE people and you pass laws that impact blacks more than whites" Don't think so? What happened in NYC with "stop and frisk"?
2. Obama is Embarassed. This is not a school or a theatre. This is the Navy Yard in Washington DC. The security of this facility and the issuance of security clearances are done by people reporting directly to Obama. This is a total failure of security protocol, background checks and ignoring police reports in the days leading up to this. People reporting directly to Obama failed to do their jobs. This is an assault on a military installation which was ALLOWED by lax security. It is, essentially, a "Benghazi" in the USA. There can be no serious discussion of gun control laws following this. We already see that the shooter was investigated by the same outfit that investigated Snowden. How much do you think Obama wants to make public about this?
3. Too close to Primary season. Political wrangling will psuh any votes out past the New Year, right into the primary season. Obama does not need to get re-elected, but. ALL of the House and 1/3 of the Senate do. Obama knows he could lose the Senate and the Repubs could keep the House. He wants BOTH back in the Dem camp. He cannot do that by pushing gun control now. The recent recalls in Colorado remind him of that. He has already given waivers to Obamacare to large contributors (Walmart) until after the elections next year. He is not going to force Dems to vote on gun control now. The earliest opportunity for congress to consider gun control again would be early 2015...depending on how the elections go. If the Dems take a spanking like they did in 2010, you can move that out to 2017. These guys do not give a rat's popah about your children, they want to protect their cushy jobs and keep their power. I doubt if there will even be a committee hearing The LAST thing they will ever do is vote on gun control in an election year like they did in 1994
4. Obama mailed off his eggs. Obama's eggs (common Russian slang for "testicles") arrived at the Kremlin two days before the shooting. Putin is publically displaying them and saying they are like "Golub eggs" (pigeon eggs) Obama cannot even muster "if I had a son he would look like the shooter" Obama abdicated a lot of his power to Putin. In a side note, this week the Ukrainian President told Putin to "####### off" and signed trade agreements with the EU bringing the former Soviet Republic closer to the west. Putin threatened "retaliation" and the Ukraine Pres gave Putin the finger. Too bad we cannot elect a similar President as a former Soviet Republic.
5. The NRA is stronger than ever, thanks to the earlier attempts this year to take away our rights, the NRA grew in membership and more Americans own guns than ever, more Americans have a "dog in the fight" and NRA membership and funding has grown incredibly. The "war chest" for lobbying and campaigning is FULL and new court rulings allow them more latitude than in previous election cycles.
6. Bigger fish to fry. Congress and Obama are up to their eyeballs in problems already.
And there you have it. Anyone wishing to be wrong is free to disagree. In 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, there will be no new federal firearms legislation. I am not going to debate it, argue or deny what anyone has to say.

ONLY if there is no signature or payment. Otherwise you would get an RFE later. If there is no signature or payment they will return the petition to you and you will correct the problem and send it back. IT WILL NOT MATTER that it is then late. Simply attach an explanation letter.
No one cuts off your fingers or toes if you are late. I know several cases where the petition was sent 1-2 months late, an explanation was attached and the petitioner still got their extension letter.
You can move on to worrying about something else

Unless THEY made a mistake, they never send TWO RFEs. If your response is not adequate, they deny the case and you start over.
two possibilities.
1. The second RFE is a duplicate of the first. It happens. If you get a 2nd one, duplicate of the first DO NOT ignore it. Send exactly the same response. These people are functionaries and if their is an RFE out there, they need a response. DO NOT assume they will figure out it was a duplicate and they don't need a 2nd response.
2. THEY may have overlooked something and needed to send a 2nd RFE. While it is rare, it can happen. Because of YOUR demands for faster processing they are involving more people, more service centers, and no weven local offices in the process of petitions. Guess what? More mistakes.
when you get frustrated, remember...this is the EASY part.

All they need to do is slam the doors closed on any employer than exploits illegals for profit and does not follow our existing labor laws. Since it is a tax code violation, they can padlock the doors until the back taxes are paid. Do that 2-3 times and the economic advantage of exploiting humans vanishes, the jobs vanish and the illegals vanish. You will pay more for having your roof replaced or a head of lettuce. So what?
Politicians will not do it because it will work. Both parties want illegals here for their own purposes.

All they need to do is slam the doors closed on any employer than exploits illegals for profit and does not follow our existing labor laws. Since it is a tax code violation, they can padlock the doors until the back taxes are paid. Do that 2-3 times and the economic advantage of exploiting humans vanishes, the jobs vanish and the illegals vanish. You will pay more for having your roof replaced or a head of lettuce. So what?
Politicians will not do it because it will work. Both parties want illegals here for their own purposes.

How many more need to be killed by police? It is a flawed concept to arm government officials and call on them to bring guns.
They should be allowed to carry firearms like any other citizen, but leave them at home when they go to work in official duties. Except in special circumstances, they should not be armed.
People need to take more responsibility for their own protection. Only they are on the scene and know who really needs to be shot. Police arrived uninformed and start shooting without knowing who needs to be shot.