
appleblossom
Members, Organizer-
Posts
5,933 -
Joined
-
Days Won
39
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Partners
Immigration Wiki
Guides
Immigration Forms
Times
Gallery
Store
Blogs
Everything posted by appleblossom
-
Which country are they from? There is always a risk, a visa doesn’t guarantee entry, but plenty of people visit with a pending I-130 with no issues. They should take proof of ties to their home country i.e. evidence of annual leave from a job, house, business, any other children etc. As you’re asking about a tourist visa, I’ll move this thread to the relevant forum. Good luck.
-
I really think you’re reading too much in to this and taking it too personally. The letter wasn’t ‘nasty’, it’s a standard one from a template. This isn’t anybody taking action for political reasons, it sounds like a case worker that somehow missed the evidence or just made a mistake. Or as said above, there’s something that’s raised a red flag for them - is there a large age gap for instance? I know it’s easier said than done but step back, take the emotion out of it, and just give them the evidence they’ve asked for. I’m sure you’ll be approved in no time. Best of luck.
-
Naturalization Question for MY Mum
appleblossom replied to joks's topic in US Citizenship General Discussion
Yes, exactly. Any absence 6 months or over resets the clock. If her 2025 trip was less than 6 months, she can start counting from whenever she returned in 2023. -
Naturalization Question for MY Mum
appleblossom replied to joks's topic in US Citizenship General Discussion
She can leave, but just not for longer than 6 months. That's what breaks the 'continuous residency' requirement. https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-12-part-d-chapter-3 So if her 2025 trip was over 6 months, then wait 5 years. If it was less than, she should be eligible to apply in 2028. -
Applying for L-2 visa with offences from 25 years ago
appleblossom replied to Dan Willmott's topic in Work Visas
I would only go with official info, not that website. There is some misinformation on there, and it's also aimed at B visa applicants. But having the SAR is a good idea, so it's good that you've got that underway. -
I 90 processing time
appleblossom replied to BlakePeru's topic in General Immigration-Related Discussion
How did you contact them, was it via this page? https://egov.uscis.gov/e-request/onpt Have you tried getting your congressman to ask on your behalf? That may be worth a shot. -
It's no problem at all, and no new I-130 has to be filed. All he has to do is add his wife as a beneficiary to his case - https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/us-visas/immigrate/the-immigrant-visa-process/step-1-submit-a-petition/step-2-begin-nvc-processing/ceac-faqs.html#ceac16 They will then both apply for visas, and both interview when the times comes and their PD is current.
-
Ds 160 help for permanent residency question
appleblossom replied to Traveller786's topic in Tourist Visas
AP is hours to years. There is no set time. Mine was only showing 'Administrative Processing' for about two hours - as we've said above, EVERYBODY goes through AP. It's simply final checks before a visa is issued. Not sure what you mean by 'recd', please type the full word out? -
Post Bugs here!
appleblossom replied to Captain Ewok's topic in Site-Related Discussion - Updates, Ideas, etc.
As it's a dependent visa rather than a standalone one, it would just come under L-1 I think. -
Applying for L-2 visa with offences from 25 years ago
appleblossom replied to Dan Willmott's topic in Work Visas
It sounds like you will need a waiver, the downside of that is the time it takes for that to be processed. But the immigration lawyers should be on the case for you. Good luck. -
I 90 processing time
appleblossom replied to BlakePeru's topic in General Immigration-Related Discussion
It's nothing to do with race. But you're well over average processing times, so have you submitted a case enquiry? -
Overstaying and divorce
appleblossom replied to somagm00's topic in Effects of Major Family Changes on Immigration Benefits
You have no way to stay though. And unfortunately by overstaying you have made things so much worse, if you'd left you'd have been able to keep visiting, but now you have a ban. If you leave before you have a year's overstay then your ban is 3 years, rather than 10, so please think really carefully about overstaying beyond that date. The longer you leave it, the worst it is likely to be - particularly with the current administration. Would your husband bring the children to visit you in Europe if you're waiting out a ban? Is your family court lawyer aware that you have no way of staying in the US and that the only option for the children to stay with you is for you to remove the children from the US to take them home with you? Says above she's overstayed more than 180 days but less than a year. -
Overstaying and divorce
appleblossom replied to somagm00's topic in Effects of Major Family Changes on Immigration Benefits
Then I'm sorry but unless you can find another route to stay (employment etc), there is no option for you to adjust now. You should leave before you reach a year of overstay, as at that point a 10 year ban will kick in - plus of course you're at risk of being deported now as you have no legal status, and it would be better to go voluntarily rather than face that. How old are your children? The eldest could petition you when s/he reaches 21. -
Overstaying and divorce
appleblossom replied to somagm00's topic in Effects of Major Family Changes on Immigration Benefits
What exactly has been filed and when? -
Ds 160 help for permanent residency question
appleblossom replied to Traveller786's topic in Tourist Visas
You've been approved for an interview waiver based on very basic information, but they then still have to look at your information and decide whether or not to grant you a visa. As part of that they can call you for an interview at any time, or request any documentation they want.