Dashinka

This may be helpful. Additionally, if called for an interview, the IO will review the form with you and allow for corrections. That being said, I would bring it up at your biometrics appointment (if you have one), and also contact USCIS. Maybe prepare a corrected form to take with you to any appointments you are called for. Good Luck! https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/made-mistake-immigration-form-how-correct-it.html

This might be helpful as a similar situation. Make sure you take the relevant documents (child’s BC and passport) with you to the interview. Good Luck!

Yes it would count. For instance a married couple (one USC and one a foreign national) living together outside the U.S. pursue DCF, and enter the U.S. with the foreign national spouse becoming an LPR still retains their time outside the U.S. as living in marital union without a break. So the LPR spouse can utilize the 90 day early filing option if filing the N400, just make sure you document the entire three plus years of living in a marital union before filing.

Yes from the standpoint of having evidence of a marital union. Good Luck!

Most of the items you mentioned here are considered secondary evidence. I would focus on things such as the mortgage you mentioned, maybe insurance documents, insurance beneficiary documents (if you have life insurance), utility bills if you can add her name, etc. Good Luck!

What did you submit with the I130 petition? Also, was there an RFE at some point since submitting?

At least you spelled it correctly.

Then what?

Keep in mind the OP is the USC petitioner, but I agree with sending copies and retaining the original documents from the courts/police.

Interesting, but apparently the law actually requires it and it was done though most of the 60's 70's, and 80's. Hmm, it also says it may look for affidavits for those filing N400's. Maybe this would nullify neighborhood checks.

Not positive relative to arrest records, but most police departments maintain a records unit to get things like a police report from a crash. If you know the police department that had jurisdiction over your arrests, I would start there and see if they have an option to request your police records. Yes, this appears to be a quick mini-summary of your arrests (maybe more detail than you showed above). Since all the court and police records are included as part of 2c., this appears to be a summary form of those for quick reference by the USCIS staff. Good Luck!

Burning Man?

She should be able to make any corrections on the DS160, and at the interview. I also reported this post to a moderator as it contains personal information. Good Luck!

Just to be clear, you are talking about the I129F petition for an alien fiancé, not the actual K1 visa application right? Assuming that is correct since you are referencing the NOA1, when was the I129F filed?

My wife did it after the wedding as we got married two weeks after she entered on her K1. Yes, she could not change her name since her only form of ID at that point was her Russian passport which matched her entry (I94) record, but that is not a huge deal, once she got her GC, we went back and updated her name with the SSA. The main point is to get your SSN early in the 90 day period authorized by the K1 entry regardless of the wedding date as if you wait until near the end of the 90 day period, the SSA may not issue it. Good Luck!

Moved to the US Citizenship General Discussion forum.

I agree with @TBoneTX recommendations. Yes, at the N400 they will review your entire immigration history, and there should be a note there from your AOS interview, and you can repeat the explanation at the N400 interview. You should be fine as the I129F was most likely sent back to USCIS at some point and has long since expired. Good Luck!

Progress? Of course the question is why is there a housing crisis? Hmmm, maybe it has everything to do with government over regulation.... Btw, I really expect the DSA candidates (Communists) 🤫will look at similar types of tax schemes. Aussies lose it over ‘spare bedroom tax’ plot A radical proposal to tax spare bedrooms in family homes in a bid to fix the housing crisis has sparked widespread outrage from Aussies. The idea was just one of many controversial tax plans floated by industry leaders and economists during last week’s Economic Reform Roundtable. Treasurer Jim Chalmers has refused to rule out new taxes in coming budgets, raising questions about which ones he will likely try to implement, and when. Mr Chalmers emerged with from the productivity summit last week with the conclusion that the tax system was “imperfect” and skewed in favour of the older generations. https://www.news.com.au/finance/economy/australian-economy/aussies-lose-it-over-spare-bedroom-tax-plot/news-story/fa8b29b9f166966214eadbb482dbff15

Never allowed derivatives under the IR category. Derivatives are allowed under the Family Preference categories (F1, F2A, F2B, F3, and F4). This case contains a mix that spans the categories. For the wife of the OP, her parents now would be IR5 hence no derivatives (unfortunately LPRs are not able to sponsor parents, but USCs can), and siblings would be F4, or F2A/F2B depending on the situation at time of filing.

Moving this to Effects of Major Family Changes on Immigration Benefits forum as it seems to fit better there.

Deal with the divorce, and picking up after it. No need except for any address changes. Changes you to a 5 yr rule filing, and you will need to show the divorce decree. Good Luck!

Read through the USCIS Policy manual updates per the 8/1 Update Alert, and still not seeing the scare mongering the lawyer (Sapochnick) is bringing up. AOS via any non-dual intent NIV was always considered somewhat risky, maybe a little more scrutiny is better by USCIS instead of just rubber stamping them. We also know that if one is AOSing from a NIV and the AOS is denied, the accrued overstay time of the beneficiary can now become an issue. I am also wondering why the lawyer referred to a green card application for those that entered illegally? Entering the US without inspection bars almost all from AOSing (CAA, Asylum, Refugee, etc. being notable exemptions). If I entered the US illegally, and did not fall under an exemption category, I don't think I would want USCIS to know my personal information. Anyway, not really seeing a lot of change in the policy manual based on what the lawyer stated in their solicitation blog.

Proterra. Ban Hammer is right, "green" is the new grift. One wonders how much money the right people from Lion or Proterra got before the companies went under. From the story below, why didn't Iowa City go with Gillig (proper spelling, the story below has it wrong) to begin with? https://www.thegazette.com/local-government/iowa-city-transit-will-add-more-electric-buses-despite-challenges-with-current-fleet/

Never actually been to one. There are a few nearby, but definitely not a first or for that matter any choice of anyone I know.

Kind of predictable.