US Immigration from Kenya

In the section 26a-27 that asks you to fill out that you have submitted a visa petition to U.S. citizenship and Immigration Services on behalf of the following person(s)---- if the joint sponsor is filling this form out, what should they put? should they put the beneficiary's me here even though it was technically me, the beneficiary, who submitted the the petition on my fiancee's behalf?

Note that I already filled out my own form and my joint sponsor is filling this form out, so I just wanted to clarify that my joint sponsor says that they did submit a petition on my fiancee's behalf. I attached screenshot below.

When filling out the I134 Affidavit of Support, in the Dependents' Information section of the form, are they asking for my fiancee to be put here if I'm supporting her, or is it only asking for children/other dependents?

I am filling out the I 134 affidavit of support to prepare my fiancee for her interview at the embassy in her country and it's unclear to me what person needs to complete the form. Would it be me (the petitioner), or is it the person who I want to sponsor her (if it's a different person from me)?

Finally am In Transit

God Is great His timing is the best

NOA1 10th September 2020

NOA2 26th March 2021

Thank you Jesus

Someone has a valid B2 which he has maintained proper use and is back outside US. When he applied for B2, he chose common law marriage option. Note, they've been living together for 6 years but have never officially got married (no official record), hence why he chose common law option during application.

Now, he's over 21 years. Parent just become USC and wants to put an application for him.

Question 1: So in terms of immigration does he fall under:

a. Unmarried child over 21 OR

b. Married child over 21

Question 2: Is common law straight up marriage? Or how does USCIS define this?

My answer to question 2 was that it depends on the law of the individual country. As such, if the law for eg Kenya says so, then it is and he falls under (b) above. If not, then it not legal and he falls under (a) above. Am I wrong with this assumption?

I was asked this question.