Jump to content

12 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hello all, 

 

I was planning to apply for my mother to get a green card, and have been planning this for a long time.  But I found out last week that the US government has suspended processing of immigrant visas for citizens of 75 countries.

 

I am wondering whether it is worth it to still submit an application, and get her in line for processing?  Maybe they will keep them in the order that they received the applications, and when/if processing is resumed, we will be better off for having submitted it?

 

Or should I just forget about it until they resume processing?

 

Are there any exceptions or ways around this suspension of processing?

 

I could have her apply for a B1/B2 visa, but she has a job that she can't afford to give up by leaving the country.

 

Thank you for any of your responses!

Edited by Clong
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

I would file now, might as well get in line.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
2 hours ago, Clong said:

I could have her apply for a B1/B2 visa, but she has a job that she can't afford to give up by leaving the country

 

A B visa is only for visiting, so she wouldn't have to give her job up for that as she'd be returning to Cambodia. Off topic, but if she has a job that she can't afford to give up, can she afford to move to the US and pay for healthcare? It's something to carefully consider if money is tight for her. 

 

But another vote to for just applying now, the I-130 alone will take at least a year or so, by the time she's at the visa stage the ban may have been lifted.

 

Good luck. 

Posted
On 1/23/2026 at 2:30 PM, appleblossom said:

 

A B visa is only for visiting, so she wouldn't have to give her job up for that as she'd be returning to Cambodia. Off topic, but if she has a job that she can't afford to give up, can she afford to move to the US and pay for healthcare? It's something to carefully consider if money is tight for her. 

 

But another vote to for just applying now, the I-130 alone will take at least a year or so, by the time she's at the visa stage the ban may have been lifted.

 

Good luck. 

Hi, the B1/B2 visa is actually pretty long stay.  She could stay a while and see what it's like to live here.  So it could involve leaving her job if it was a fairly long visit.

 

We'll have to pay for her healthcare while she is here.  

 

So are you saying that the I-130 processing will still continue despite the suspension of processing?  I guess I don't totally understand the process.  Need to read up on it.  It sounds like I-130 is still going on, it's just the next phase of the process that has been suspended?

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

She does not have a B

 

Begs the question how likely someone who will leave their job for a long visit is likely to get one.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
1 hour ago, Clong said:

Hi, the B1/B2 visa is actually pretty long stay.  She could stay a while and see what it's like to live here.  So it could involve leaving her job if it was a fairly long visit.

 

We'll have to pay for her healthcare while she is here.  

 

So are you saying that the I-130 processing will still continue despite the suspension of processing?  I guess I don't totally understand the process.  Need to read up on it.  It sounds like I-130 is still going on, it's just the next phase of the process that has been suspended?


She’d be better off just visiting for a couple of weeks and keeping her job. She’s not likely to get a B visa anyway but saying she’ll stay for months and has no job to return to would make it even less likely. 
 

The I-130 is just a petition, the actual visa application comes after that. And it’s the visa she can’t get. 

Posted

To my understanding, once she files for an immigrant visa, and based on long-standing policy, she would be very unlikely to receive a non-immigrant visa in the near future (even if the immigrant visa doesn't get processed because of the ban), since she would then have established the intent to immigrate. So there might be some sense in trying for the tourist visa now so that you can see her before the later immigrant application is filed , especially if you feel that you won't be able to go back and see her in the near future.

 

(as a note, however, there are other factors involved here that complicate this--for example, I'm not clear as to how a possible rejection on the B visa would affect an immigrant visa application? And I suppose it is possible that the ban could make it more likely for those waiting in line for immigrant visas to actually be granted non-immigrant visas since I think the ban takes the AOS in-US option off the table (or am I wrong there)? And, of course, you are probably delaying the immigrant visa application by 6 months once you take into account the non-immigrant application, travel, and return.  So others more knowledgeable than I might be able to help assess whether what I wrote makes any sense)

Posted (edited)
On 1/25/2026 at 12:37 PM, appleblossom said:


She’d be better off just visiting for a couple of weeks and keeping her job. She’s not likely to get a B visa anyway but saying she’ll stay for months and has no job to return to would make it even less likely. 
 

The I-130 is just a petition, the actual visa application comes after that. And it’s the visa she can’t get. 

So I guess its better to at least try for the B1/B2 visa first, it will be decided fairly quickly.  Assuming she doesn't get the B1/B2, do the immigrant visa petition after that?  

 

I'll look up the process to understand.  I think what you mean is that they process the I-130 petition first.  This part is not suspended by the recent announcement.  After the petition is approved, then the visa is processes after that.  This is the part that is currently suspended.

 

Thanks for your help!

Edited by Clong
thanks
Posted
On 1/26/2026 at 12:14 AM, northusa44 said:

To my understanding, once she files for an immigrant visa, and based on long-standing policy, she would be very unlikely to receive a non-immigrant visa in the near future (even if the immigrant visa doesn't get processed because of the ban), since she would then have established the intent to immigrate. So there might be some sense in trying for the tourist visa now so that you can see her before the later immigrant application is filed , especially if you feel that you won't be able to go back and see her in the near future.

 

(as a note, however, there are other factors involved here that complicate this--for example, I'm not clear as to how a possible rejection on the B visa would affect an immigrant visa application? And I suppose it is possible that the ban could make it more likely for those waiting in line for immigrant visas to actually be granted non-immigrant visas since I think the ban takes the AOS in-US option off the table (or am I wrong there)? And, of course, you are probably delaying the immigrant visa application by 6 months once you take into account the non-immigrant application, travel, and return.  So others more knowledgeable than I might be able to help assess whether what I wrote makes any sense)

So it sounds like it makes more sense to apply for a non-immigrant visa first, if there's little chance to get one after the immigrant visa is applied.

 

thanks for all your notes on possible different scenarios!  Very helpful

Posted
3 hours ago, Clong said:

So I guess its better to at least try for the B1/B2 visa first, it will be decided fairly quickly.  Assuming she doesn't get the B1/B2, do the immigrant visa petition after that?  

 

I'll look up the process to understand.  I think what you mean is that they process the I-130 petition first.  This part is not suspended by the recent announcement.  After the petition is approved, then the visa is processes after that.  This is the part that is currently suspended.

 

Thanks for your help!

 

Exactly that, yes. And yes, I think that's the best thing to do, give the B visa a try first and then at least you know. 

 

Good luck. 

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted

Be sure to return here and let us know how you've proceeded, and the results.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...