Spousal Visa - Protection of assets(merged)

[Boiler 43,453]

6 minutes ago, rayman26 said:

It's a great question.   That is why I was seeing what anyone else had to say.  At the end of the day we all want to be together, and I can't see leaving a child behind over money.  So, to the extent that I'm exposed it will be worth it in the end (hopefully).   I don't really have a plan B.  Probably just hope for the best.  

It does seem there should be some opportunity to find a middle ground.  The absense of one I think may lead to people bailing out early.   I won't be doing that however.

 

Well seems it is all a bluff, and she probably knows it.

[Ontarkie 13,918]

1 hour ago, Boris Farage said:

My apologies if I touched a nerve -- I truly feel for the poster, having been taken to the cleaners myself. I agree that any prenup must be ironclad both here and there to protect himself. Perhaps I wasn't clear that it is important for his fiancee to also have competent representation and in a language that she understands. This is crucial. Your advice is spot on.

 

I only wish it were true that in California the immigrant always gets what he or she wants in court, certainly wasn't the case for me. 

No nerves hit,  I just didn't want this guy thinking your case could be the same for him with the prenup holding.  I think what went wrong in your case was you trying to adjust something you put in motion.