Hillary Clinton and the real Russian collusion

[jg121783 3,921]

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/25/hillary-clinton-and-real-russian-collusion.html

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

Just now, jg121783 said:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/25/hillary-clinton-and-real-russian-collusion.html

#fakefakefake

[Dashinka 25,887]

14 hours ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

#fakefakefake

Of course, Hillary is pure as the wind driven snow!

 

 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

3 hours ago, Bill & Katya said:

Of course, Hillary is pure as the wind driven snow!

 

 

You don't need to say that to see these stories are smoke screens

[Dashinka 25,887]

4 hours ago, Il Mango Dulce said:

You don't need to say that to see these stories are smoke screens

Aren't all political stories smoke screens?  Manafort is indicted over financial transactions from many years ago, and everyone is saying Trump's indictment is just around the corner.  Meanwhile, Tony Podesta who was doing the same thing as Manafort back then is running for cover.  Hmmm, interesting.

[bcking 3,157]

23 hours ago, jg121783 said:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/10/25/hillary-clinton-and-real-russian-collusion.html

Whoever wrote that article needs to double check their hyperlink sources.

 

"Yet, between the first week of August 2010 and October 22, 2010, the Obama Administration in expedited time approved the sale of crucial national security resources to Russia by rubber stamping the sale of Uranium One to Rosatom. In 2015, Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, noted the expedited time of the deal's approval in a letter to then Attorney General Loretta Lynch, calling it a deal that was "apparently approved in record speed.""

 

The hyperlinks for "approved" and "apparently approved..." BOTH link to a 2006 article about the Dubai Port deal (the same article).

 

They probably just messed up and it didn't get noticed, but still funny when they are trying to act legit and provide sources (or corroborating news reports from other outlets) for their statements.

Edited October 30, 2017 by bcking

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

Aren't all political stories smoke screens?  Manafort is indicted over financial transactions from many years ago, and everyone is saying Trump's indictment is just around the corner.  Meanwhile, Tony Podesta who was doing the same thing as Manafort back then is running for cover.  Hmmm, interesting.

I have not seen anyone say anything about Trumps Indictment, indicting a sitting president is a big deal.  Are you sure about that? 

I don't know the details about Tony or his brother and their receiving money from Russian sources, but if they broke the law..so be it.

The entire "many years ago" narrative is laughable...this was going on right into Manaforts work as Trumps campaign manager .