Barack Obama endorses French presidential candidate Emmanuel Macron days before runoff election

[Dashinka 25,889]

 

fortunately there are many in government (both sides of the aisle too) that totally disagree that investigating trump/russia (which was going on BEFORE HE WON) is "dumb and dangerous". in fact, they believe the head in the sand approach trump supporters are so fond of is "dumb and dangerous"

Is that like Diane Feinstein that said after looking at the classified information 'there is no evidence of collusion', or the Democrat Reps for the House Intelligence Committe that haven't even bothered to go see for themselves?  This is approaching the same level as the "Birthers" and yes, I know President Trump was a vocal supporter of that conspiracy theory, so maybe it is karma, but both were and are dumb.

 

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/04/dianne-feinstein-says-she-has-not-seen-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion-video/

 

 

 

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

 

The irony here is I've not said anything in defense of Putin. Everything I've said relates directly to the evidence (proof) of these claims. Stop with the straw man arguments.

No irony...the intelligence community analysis that it was Russian intelligence units that executed the attacks...No doubt it was authorized by Putin.  Defending this assault on our system is defending Putin against our national interests.

[IAMX 3,055]

 

No irony...the intelligence community analysis that it was Russian intelligence units that executed the attacks...No doubt it was authorized by Putin.  Defending this assault on our system is defending Putin against our national interests.

Still waiting on the proof of their claims. Wikileaks has provided more proof on this situation than the US intelligence community has. And it doesn't point to your claim. And it doesn't point to hacking the US election, just idiots in the Democratic Party clicking on phishing emails. A lot to prove here.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

 

Is that like Diane Feinstein that said after looking at the classified information 'there is no evidence of collusion', or the Democrat Reps for the House Intelligence Committe that haven't even bothered to go see for themselves?  This is approaching the same level as the "Birthers" and yes, I know President Trump was a vocal supporter of that conspiracy theory, so maybe it is karma, but both were and are dumb.

 

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/04/dianne-feinstein-says-she-has-not-seen-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion-video/

 

 

 

You do not need evidence of collusion to peruse this investigation. The breach alone is concerning..The release of materials is concerning enough. The risk that this behavior will be repeated against the US or our allies is reason enough to arm ourselves against this assault.

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

 

Still waiting on the proof of their claims. Wikileaks has provided more proof on this situation than the US intelligence community has. And it doesn't point to your claim. And it doesn't point to hacking the US election, just idiots in the Democratic Party clicking on phishing emails. A lot to prove here.

I provided the link to the official public statement from the US IC.  You will choose to believe what you believe. Why cast over empty water?

 

[Jacque67 7,328]

Feinstein can't reveal classified info. Read between the lines of what she stated. Sigh.

[IAMX 3,055]

 

I provided the link to the official public statement from the US IC.  You will choose to believe what you believe. Why cast over empty water?

 

I've seen it, it doesn't agree with your claims. It's also got no proof.

[jg121783 3,921]

Some intelligence personnel say there was Russian involvement. Some say there wasn't. Right now all we have is he said she said. No solid evidence whatsoever. No smoking gun. The whitch hunt has gone on long enough already.

[IAMX 3,055]

 

Some intelligence personnel say there was Russian involvement. Some say there wasn't. Right now all we have is he said she said. No solid evidence whatsoever. No smoking gun. The whitch hunt has gone on long enough already.

If they supposedly have any proof would be cool if they just came out with it before Wikileaks might.

 

The intelligence community laid a fat poop called the Iraq WMD. They've not earned my trust. Proof or ####### off.

Edited May 6, 2017 by IAMX

[CaliCat 3,957]

 

So the left complains about alleged (unproven) foreign involvement in our election while at the same time their former leader gets involved in foreign elections. Typical hypocracy of the left.

 

 

Hypocrisy is someone comparing Obama's open endorsement of a French candidate to the Russian hacking and interfering with the US elections.  But of course you already knew that. LOL. 

[jg121783 3,921]

What Russian interfering and hacking? So far there is no evidence of any of that.

[IAMX 3,055]

 

What Russian interfering and hacking? So far there is no evidence of any of that.

Demanding proof is the kinda stuff Putin slappies do, evidently. 

 

Lefties Non Putin slappies just believe whoever and whatever, as long as it puts a normal election in an illegitimate light.

Edited May 6, 2017 by IAMX

[Amica Nostra 4,803]

 

What Russian interfering and hacking? So far there is no evidence of any of that.

There is s

Absolutely no evidence, no solid evidence, so say yes some say no. You are allover the board on this. 

[jg121783 3,921]

 

There is s

Absolutely no evidence, no solid evidence, so say yes some say no. You are allover the board on this. 

How am I all over the board? There is no solid evidence. People can say whatever they want. That alone doesn't qualify as evidence. I'm sure everyone here remembers when we were told about WMDs by these same people.

[IAMX 3,055]

Last night people on 4chan were spilling about some leak. Of course the timing is suspicious, but I'd like to reiterate (replaced Trump at the start with Clinton, didn't realize I had typed that):  

 

 

Macron's chances far supersede Clinton's. Of course, like a lot of people, I was wrong about Trump's chances come Election Day, but there are a ton of lefties in France, that would have to completely disregard their leftist views to vote for Le Pen, whereas in the US the lefties can't win without moderates and independents. While I hope Le Pen wins, I already know the chances are pretty damn slim.

 

I think more than anything what should be looked at is how much more popularity Le Pen and co have as a result of terrible policies. I don't believe any leftist leader in Europe has a clue, they will keep up the reckless Islamization of their countries, selling their countries off to globalism, and in doing so will spark stronger nationalist movements those like Le Pen, Wilders, Petry, etc. took advantage of. While I'm worried in the short term for the damage leftists will do, not so worried in the long term.

Edited May 6, 2017 by IAMX