Jump to content

180 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Bill & Katya said:

Sort of like the Lefty Love Fests we usually see. 

 

Due process is important, but if you are faced with a life and death situation that you did not create, I would hope you would be the one coming out on top rather than the alleged perpetrator.   

Of course it is preferable that the person defended themselves against home invaders was victorious. Doesn't mean the ultimate outcome that occured was the best possible outcome. 

 

They may not have been minors, but they were young (they were referred to as "three teenagers"). Yes they broke the law, yes they were invading a home with a knife and brass knuckles. However now there life is over. That could have been the biggest mistake of their life and had they survived they could have changed. Would they have? We will never know now. The "best possible outcome" would have been the home owners protecting themselves, the invaders getting caught. They were armed with a knife/brass knuckles, that doesn't mean they were ever going to actually murder someone (yes we will never know). Had they survived, they could have been convincted of buglary, and something involving carrying weapons but it would not have been a life sentence. They may have turned around (again they may not have, but the outcome we have is death which is quite permanent).

 

I won't judge what the young boy at home did to protect himself and his family. They had already broken in, and if it was clear they were armed, he used what reasonable defense he had at the time. It is still sad though.

 

I also found it interesting that in Oklahoma it seems that the getaway driver (any living accomplice I guess?) gets charged with first degree murder for the deaths of their compadres. 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Nature Boy Flair said:

Nope just excited the good guys won.

yeah, i'm sure the kid who just took the lives of three people feels like a winner. he's on cloud nine right now, top of the world. gun lovers are so weird.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted
2 minutes ago, smilesammich said:

yeah, i'm sure the kid who just took the lives of three people feels like a winner. he's on cloud nine right now, top of the world. gun lovers are so weird.

Beats being 6ft under, like the perps.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

cac1ddd2b8ec348796f69df6eea0574d85258351

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted
5 minutes ago, Boiler said:

cac1ddd2b8ec348796f69df6eea0574d85258351

probably annoying to you that i'm going to go ahead and make the association between getting giddy over three dead teenagers and the premise that shooting and killing anyone is 'winning'. 

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Wales
Timeline
Posted

There is only one giddy person on this thread.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, SRVT said:

To sum up the thread:

 

- Armed robbers break into house

- Gun owner shoots them, killing all 3

- Liberals upset because criminals died rather than the victim

Who has said here that they prefer that the victim die? Please quote that person for us.

 

There aren't two options. It isn't "Criminal dies or victim dies". Of course if those are the only options, I think we would all choose the criminal's death. 

 

We just are able to see the situation for what it is. It is far more complex. "Who knew gun violence was a complex issue" you may say, well we all seem to understand that.

 

There were many possible outcomes. Yes this outcome is better than the 1 other option you provide (victim dies, criminals win) but there were other outcomes. People have defended themselves from home invaders without the death of the home invaders. They could have been shot but not killed. 

 

I'm not saying anything should have happened differently, I'm just saying that I recognize that of the MANY different outcomes (not just two) it is sad that 3 people were killed. Yes it would have been FAR worse if the homeowners were killed, but that doesn't negate the fact that three "teenagers" were killed. Teenagers can be dumb and do really stupid things. DOesn't necessarily mean the best outcome is when their life ends. Yes they were criminals, but I would have prefered they be apprehended and punished through our justice system. I believe the other "liberals" here feel the same.

Edited by TBoneTX
to de-profane a prohibited term
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, bcking said:

Who has said here that they prefer that the victim die? Please quote that person for us.

 

There aren't two options. It isn't "Criminal dies or victim dies". Of course if those are the only options, I think we would all choose the criminal's death. 

 

We just are able to see the situation for what it is. It is far more complex. "Who knew gun violence was a complex issue" you may say, well we all seem to understand that.

 

There were many possible outcomes. Yes this outcome is better than the 1 other option you provide (victim dies, criminals win) but there were other outcomes. People have defended themselves from home invaders without the death of the home invaders. They could have been shot but not killed. 

 

I'm not saying anything should have happened differently, I'm just saying that I recognize that of the MANY different outcomes (not just two) it is sad that 3 people were killed. Yes it would have been FAR worse if the homeowners were killed, but that doesn't negate the fact that three "teenagers" were killed. Teenagers can be dumb and do really stupid things. DOesn't necessarily mean the best outcome is when their life ends. Yes they were criminals, but I would have prefered they be apprehended and punished through our justice system. I believe the other "liberals" here feel the same.

could you list for us a few of your many different outcomes. 

Edited by TBoneTX
to de-profane a prohibited word in quoted text
Country:
Timeline
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, bcking said:

Who has said here that they prefer that the victim die? Please quote that person for us.

 

There aren't two options. It isn't "Criminal dies or victim dies". Of course if those are the only options, I think we would all choose the criminal's death. 

 

We just are able to see the situation for what it is. It is far more complex. "Who knew gun violence was a complex issue" you may say, well we all seem to understand that.

 

There were many possible outcomes. Yes this outcome is better than the 1 other option you provide (victim dies, criminals win) but there were other outcomes. People have defended themselves from home invaders without the death of the home invaders. They could have been shot but not killed. 

 

I'm not saying anything should have happened differently, I'm just saying that I recognize that of the MANY different outcomes (not just two) it is sad that 3 people were killed. Yes it would have been FAR worse if the homeowners were killed, but that doesn't negate the fact that three "teenagers" were killed. Teenagers can be dumb and do really stupid things. DOesn't necessarily mean the best outcome is when their life ends. Yes they were criminals, but I would have prefered they be apprehended and punished through our justice system. I believe the other "liberals" here feel the same.

If only the victim would have apprehended all 3 of them. 

 

Anyways, saves the taxpayers money not having to try and jail these 3 pieces of . Had they been tried in court they would have been tried as an adult anyways, rather than innocent little teenagers.

Edited by TBoneTX
to de-profane a prohibited word in quoted text
 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...