We Lost Our Daughter to a Mass Shooter and Now Owe $203,000 to His Ammo Dealer

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Negative

Right to own and bear arms

Only people who can't own the are felons and some mentally disable

If you don't own or possess a gun or a firearm in the USA then you the minority..........

The point is, it's not mandatory.

Your choice of words needs serious work.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Put all the blame on the heartless folks at the Brady foundation. They dance on dead folks graves .

That's just more propaganda isn't it. You like guns, they don't, therefore on that basis they have no legitimate points to raise.

It's like trying to liken people who advocate family planning and contraception to Nazis and holocaust - it's crass and irrelevant.

[Boiler 43,847]

This has NOTHING to do whether you like Guns or not, please stay on topic.

It is all about a sick and perverted organisation taking advantage of a grief stricken family and then leaving them in the lurch.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

This has NOTHING to do whether you like Guns or not, please stay on topic.

It is all about a sick and perverted organisation taking advantage of a grief stricken family and then leaving them in the lurch.

Why don't you take it up with LIB or the folks here who don't care about the family?

Perhaps because you don't care about the issue at all and instead have some axe to grind?

Edited September 28, 2015 by Trumplestiltskin

[Sousuke 1,214]

I do think pro-gun people should start a gofund me account for the family (its basically donating to the NRA anyway).

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I do think pro-gun people should start a gofund me account for the family (its basically donating to the NRA anyway).

Or the corporation could do that equally by waiving the fees. The legal win is worth more than the lawyers fees, after all.

[lostinblue 1,989]

Why don't you take it up with LIB or the folks here who don't care about the family?

Perhaps because you don't care about the issue at all and instead have some axe to grind?

what the outrage should be is how a hate group like the Brady folks preyed on a very vulnerable group of parents that lost their child in a shooting by an insane person. Rather than go after laws that will keep this person in jail .instead of being put to death when he is "cured " of his insanity they go after a law abiding legitimate company .. The hate flows from this organization .They dance on the graves of dead folks all the time .

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

They dance on graves...

Ludicrous

[Boiler 43,847]

In an ideal world the lawyers should be disbarred and a pro bono Lawyer would take up the case and sue the Brady Campaign for Damages.

In an ideal world...

Now a GoFundMe campaign for that would have my support.

[elmcitymaven 9,711]

One of the tools we as citizens have to change the law is to challenge laws through the courts. My takeaway is that this wasn't a challenge to the constitutionality of the Second Amendment, but to the constitutionality of the Colorado law in the way it intersected with Federal law. Is it constitutional to remove negligence as a cause of action against demonstrably "bad apple" dealers? I think this was a poor choice of defendant -- Lucky Gunner was demonstrably not a bad apple.

Lawyers don't get disbarred for this, nor should they.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

what the outrage should be is how a hate group like the Brady folks preyed on a very vulnerable group of parents that lost their child in a shooting by an insane person. Rather than go after laws that will keep this person in jail .instead of being put to death when he is "cured " of his insanity they go after a law abiding legitimate company .. The hate flows from this organization .They dance on the graves of dead folks all the time .

To what extent do you care about the family and their situation?

[Boiler 43,847]

To what extent do you care about the family and their situation?

Only person who seems not bothered about how this family have been used and abused seems to be you.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Only person who seems not bothered about how this family have been used and abused seems to be you.

Does it?

"Used and abused" is your interpretation of part of this picture.

My interpretation of it is that, having read some of the comments on the first page, that some people don't give a toss about the family and would instead see them screwed over yet again just to prove some philosophical point about frivolous lawsuits and the rights of the corporation and of gun owners.

Why is my interpretation less valid than yours?

[Boiler 43,847]

I am not looking to interpret anybody, just read what they said, so I have no interpretation to put forward.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I am not looking to interpret anybody, just read what they said, so I have no interpretation to put forward.

Everything is interpretation, you're in denial if you believe otherwise.

Right now it just seems that you want to be combative because you don't like my opinion. Afraid you're just going to have to deal with it.