Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
We Keep Receipts

Cheating Wife Reportedly Busted While Sexting At A Baseball Game

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

A woman who was apparently cheating on her husband was reportedly busted at a baseball game in Atlanta by a pair of eagle-eyed sisters sitting right behind her.

Last week, Delana and Brynn Hinson posted images on social media showing what appeared to be a woman sexting someone who is not her husband. The Hinson sisters say the woman's spouse had been sitting next to her at the time, watching a game between the Atlanta Braves and Los Angeles Dodgers at Turner Field.

"I will be naked... laying on the ground" one of the messages reads. "Mark Allen I lov ... much," said another text, partially obscured by the woman's hand.

The name at the top of the screen was "Nancy."

While there's always a chance this could be another Internet hoax, the story is making headlines around the world and the two have offered images and videos they say is evidence of what took place in the row in front of them.

At one point, one of the sisters even wrote a warning message on what appears to be the teams' rosters.

"Your wife is cheating on you. look at the messages under Nancy," it said. "It's really a man named Mark Allen."

She included a phone number and offered to send images of the texts in case they were deleted.

"Sorry, just thought you should know," the message concluded.

Two two wrote said on Twitter that they handed the sheet to the man after the game, who looked at it, gave them a thumbs-up and later sent a text asking for the photo.

Brynn also tweeted that she hadn't heard from the man since that text, so she doesn't know what happened next.

"After I sent him the pictures we didn’t talk," Delana Hinson told Metro.co.uk. "I don’t think he’s confronted her yet. I want to ask him but it’s not my place."

The Hinsons have not yet responded to a request for more information from The Huffington Post.

A similar incident happened last year at an NFL game. In that one, a pregnant woman was allegedly texting a lover while her boyfriend or husband watched the game.

While the Hinsons have received messages of support and skepticism, some have also suggested that the two should've minded their own business.

But others say the sisters went above and beyond.


“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The walls (or bleachers) have ears.

Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Integrity: Doing the right thing when no one is looking.


“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"After I sent him the pictures we didn’t talk," Delana Hinson told Metro.co.uk. "I don’t think he’s confronted her yet. I want to ask him but it’s not my place."

No, it's your place to record something out of context that you know nothing about, pass it on to someone you do not know, and then publicly tweet and contact the Huffington post.


I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"After I sent him the pictures we didn’t talk," Delana Hinson told Metro.co.uk. "I don’t think he’s confronted her yet. I want to ask him but it’s not my place."

No, it's your place to record something out of context that you know nothing about, pass it on to someone you do not know, and then publicly tweet and contact the Huffington post.

"I will be naked... laying on the ground" one of the messages reads. "Mark Allen I lov ... much,"

Two things. First, I'm not sure how else you can take the above messages out of context. Unless it's completely normal to talk about loving someone else so much who isn't your spouse or child.

Second. Why the name change? Calling someone Nancy when their name is Mark Allen? Yeah, nothing fishy about that...


“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"I will be naked... laying on the ground" one of the messages reads. "Mark Allen I lov ... much,"

Two things. First, I'm not sure how else you can take the above messages out of context. Unless it's completely normal to talk about loving someone else so much who isn't your spouse or child.

Second. Why the name change? Calling someone Nancy when their name is Mark Allen? Yeah, nothing fishy about that...

She could be repeating what a friend said to her and she is spreading the gossip

or one missed line at the start: "hey this is Nancy! Mark wants to ask you what Cindy said about him, I'm handing him the phone!"

Maybe they are swingers or in an open marriage and they've just been outed to the world..

I can think of a dozen plausible explanations besides she is cheating on him..

If I had to put money down I would put it on the cheating.. Even so if they feel they just have to take action at best the most they should do is quietly mention it to the husband and not broadcast it to social media and then traditional media. Even if it is the husbands right to know, its not the entire worlds business.


I don't believe it.. Prove it to me and I still won't believe it. -Ford Prefect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She could be repeating what a friend said to her and she is spreading the gossip

or one missed line at the start: "hey this is Nancy! Mark wants to ask you what Cindy said about him, I'm handing him the phone!"

Maybe they are swingers or in an open marriage and they've just been outed to the world..

I can think of a dozen plausible explanations besides she is cheating on him..

If I had to put money down I would put it on the cheating.. Even so if they feel they just have to take action at best the most they should do is quietly mention it to the husband and not broadcast it to social media and then traditional media. Even if it is the husbands right to know, its not the entire worlds business.

This I agree with. The social media part is way over the top.

If she was forwarding the message, it would have said FWD: Your second theory has some merit, but swingers usually don't say they love their partners outside of the marriage.It's one of the rules. I know this because I used to know someone who was in a swinging marriage.


“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.” – Coretta Scott King

"Oppressive language does more than represent violence; it is violence; does more than represent the limits of knowledge; it limits knowledge." -Toni Morrison

He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it.

Martin Luther King, Jr.

President-Obama-jpg.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

She could be repeating what a friend said to her and she is spreading the gossip

or one missed line at the start: "hey this is Nancy! Mark wants to ask you what Cindy said about him, I'm handing him the phone!"

Maybe they are swingers or in an open marriage and they've just been outed to the world..

I can think of a dozen plausible explanations besides she is cheating on him..

If I had to put money down I would put it on the cheating.. Even so if they feel they just have to take action at best the most they should do is quietly mention it to the husband and not broadcast it to social media and then traditional media. Even if it is the husbands right to know, its not the entire worlds business.

Its not our position in life to read over others shoulders at what is on their device, book, laptop...that is poor manners

It is not our duty to capture someone else's communications ( electronic or otherwise) with out the permissions of all parties. In some states that is a violation of the law.

Last but not least: If I have private information, and I feel compelled to share that with say the husband, sharing with the world via social media is not the way.


The content available on a site dedicated to bringing folks to America should not be promoting racial discord, euro-supremacy, discrimination based on religion , exclusion of groups from immigration based on where they were born, disenfranchisement of voters rights based on how they might vote.

horsey-change.jpg?w=336&h=265

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it's great a pair of conscienctious (sp?) humans were busy that day !

#GodPower !


Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

2mzcunl.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×