clarification regarding two scenarios (split topic)

[Michael2017 368]

The whole AoS story is confusing for me. 2 examples to clarify please:

1. Example: Interview is in August 2015. The Sponsor was a student and did not early much in 2014.

After he graduated, let`s say in June 2015 he received a high paying job. He is currently employed

with a good income. Will he qualify as sponsor?

2. Example: Interview is in August 2015. The sponsor had a great job, made enough money, but

lost his job just 3 months before the interview. His tax returns for the last 3 years are sufficient,

but he has no assets that would qualify. Would this sponsor not qualify even his tax returns

of the past years are good enough?

Please explain the system on both cases above. This will bring a clue to many readers here.

Thanks!

[Penguin_ie 5,984]

The whole AoS story is confusing for me. 2 examples to clarify please:

1. Example: Interview is in August 2015. The Sponsor was a student and did not early much in 2014.

After he graduated, let`s say in June 2015 he received a high paying job. He is currently employed

with a good income. Will he qualify as sponsor?

2. Example: Interview is in August 2015. The sponsor had a great job, made enough money, but

lost his job just 3 months before the interview. His tax returns for the last 3 years are sufficient,

but he has no assets that would qualify. Would this sponsor not qualify even his tax returns

of the past years are good enough?

Please explain the system on both cases above. This will bring a clue to many readers here.

Thanks!

AOS is based on CURRENT and ONGOING income. Thus:

1. Probably. Some places are picky and want to see a few months paystubs to show it is a stable job, but as long as you can show an employers letter and a couple of bi-weekly paystubs, it should be ok.

2. No, because he has no income to support the beneficiary with in the future.

[Michael2017 368]

Thanks Penguin!

Now, let's go further in case 2 please. What happens if the consulate does not accept the too short employment period?

Will they say, come back in 3 months and show that the job is still stable and ongoing, or if you don`t satisfy the condition during

the interview, your petition is denied and you need to start the process all over again?

[Ryan H 3,790]

Posts split into separate thread as poster is asking their own question and not replying to the OP of the other thread. Please start your own thread with your own questions instead of hijacking threads started by other members.

[Penguin_ie 5,984]

Scenario 1, you mean?

Usually you are given a while to show more proof, 45, 60 or 90 days is common. That would give more time to show stable income and/ or find a co-sponsor; if I was in that situation, I'd go to the second interview with both, and present the co-sponsor stuff if they seem iffy about the job still.

But, yes, they can and have denied people for not having enough income (and in the cases of K1s, even with co-sponsors sometimes, as some embassies do no like co-sponsors for K1s).