Jump to content

Reports: Vacations for Illegals, Feds Push Illegal Kids to Front of Line

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Two new reports are adding controversy to the troubled immigration system, one detailing how U.S. officials are treating illegal youths to mini-vacations and another revealing that the administration is pushing aside proper immigration applicants from family members of Americans in favor of the recent wave of kids that flooded over the border.

Quoting new United States Citizenship and Immigration Services documents, the Center for Immigration Studies said that the kids seen by Washington as education "Dreamers" are getting priority over applicants like the foreign spouses of Americans.

"The document reveals that processing of most applications for legal immigration benefits, including the highest priority family categories, such as spouses of U.S. citizens, were de-emphasized so that the agency could instead focus on approving the [Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals]applications," wrote Jessica Vaughan for the center on Thursday.

"Apparently some USCIS 'customers' are more deserving than others," she wrote of the kids in the DACA program.

She wrote about an Alabama man who posted a YouTube video describing the delay he and his foreign wife suffered waiting for a simple green card renewal.

Meanwhile, a Washington Post story about an effort to seize and hold illegal teens suspected of drug connections are getting treated to mini-holidays and English classes.

"During their detention, they are questioned by U.S. authorities and then transferred to a network of facilities run by the Office of Refugee Resettlement, part of the Department of Health and Human Services, across 15 states. While confined, they undergo psychological evaluations and take English courses. Some are allowed tourist-type activities, such as going to the beach or museums, according to Mexican consular officials in Texas. At least one youth earned a high school general equivalency diploma," said the paper.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow Janelle. Just more validation to what we already know. From a link in the article you posted:

USCIS Favors Illegal Alien Applicants over Americans and Legal Immigrants
A USCIS document provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee details exactly which categories of legal immigrants were disadvantaged by the implementation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, the amnesty for the so-called illegal alien "Dreamers". The document reveals that processing of most applications for legal immigration benefits, including the highest priority family categories, such as spouses of U.S. citizens, were de-emphasized so that the agency could instead focus on approving the DACA applications.
The committee asked USCIS to provide any instructions on the prioritization of categories of applications resulting from the diversion of resources and staff to process DACA applications. The agency responded, in part:
Whenever USCIS receives a sudden increase in workload, a detailed analysis of the services requested is performed. Considering the need to provide special emphasis to certain form types, USCIS is able to make initial risk-based resource allocation decisions so that all USCIS customers are given the attention and service they deserve. (Emphasis added.)
Apparently some USCIS "customers" are more deserving than others. According to a chart provided, the following types of applicants are considered deserving of "special emphasis" during the DACA adjudication period:
  • Employers asking for temporary workers (with or without paying the premium processing fee);
  • Applicants for advance parole (a travel document only needed by illegal aliens with temporary status);
  • Refugees needing a travel document;
  • Employers sponsoring immigrant workers;
  • U.S. parents adopting children from overseas;
  • Applicants for work permits (DACA applicants, other illegal aliens, and temporary visitors)
  • Military naturalization applicants
All other types of applications were considered not deserving of special emphasis. These applications had to wait longer for processing, even though the fees were the same as ever (actually higher, since they were just raised in 2010). They included all family-based immigrant petitions and applications, refugee and asylee green cards, relatives of refugees and asylees, applicants for temporary protected status, victims of human trafficking, crime victims, immigrants seeking to naturalize, and anyone needing a replacement document.
The de-prioritization of the family cases resulted in very long, truly unacceptable, waiting times for these applicants. Waiting times for U.S. citizens seeking to sponsor a spouse stretched to 15 months in some parts of the country in 2013, nearly three times the waiting time that USCIS claimed was its goal (five months, which is not exactly what most people would consider prompt service considering that the fee just for the first step is $420).
As outlined in the USCIS document and other reports, the agency struggled to balance its immense existing workload of applicants with its emphasis on processing the DACA applicants in particular. In early 2012, they moved to centralize processing of immediate family petitions, then de-centralized processing, then finally partially centralized these cases by the fall of 2013. At one point, when USCIS tried to centralize processing at the National Benefits Center in Missouri, it experienced "hiring difficulties" that it attributed to "general deficiencies within the local employment market". No DACA or other adjudicators were diverted to take up this workload. Instead, the petitions for spouses and parents of U.S. citizens were simply allowed to pile up. By the end of June 2013, USCIS reported that there were 853,737 family petitions stacked up awaiting adjudication.
Meanwhile, the DACA program was chugging along, approving approximately 40,000 applications per month, with typical waiting times of two to four months. In 2013 alone USCIS processed more than 480,000 DACA applications.
The delays for hundreds of thousands of family-based legal immigrants and other types of applicants caused by the president's amnesty for the Dreamers have been hugely disruptive to some lives. For family-based applicants, their lives are on hold while waiting for USCIS to get to their cases. For naturalization applicants, it could mean losing out on the opportunity to vote.
An American man from Alabama, Kevin Morgan, became so frustrated at the slow service and apparent ineptitude at USCIS in processing his wife's simple renewal of her green card that he made a YouTube video about their Kafkaesque experience. His wife applied in person for her 10-year green card renewal on March 10, 2014, and paid the fee of $450. It took seven months for USCIS to approve it and put it in the mail. The Morgans never received it. To make a long and confounding story short, after much back-and-forthing, conflicting information, inappropriate instructions, and literally hours on hold on the phone, USCIS to this day refuses to issue a replacement renewal green card unless the Morgans pay another $450, even though the agency has conceded that the couple never received the first one that was sent. I hope that Mrs. Morgan does not need to show her card for employment or to get a driver's license or for any other situation where she has to prove her legal status, because she can't at the moment.
It really should not be all that difficult for USCIS to check her biometrics and just issue the woman another darn card, for goodness sake, without gouging for another $450. USCIS mumbled something to the Morgans at one point about how it couldn't do that because of possible fraud, but the truth is that, according to the fraud assessments done several years ago, there actually isn't much fraud that occurs in connection with green card renewals, thanks to the biometrics.
If Mrs. Morgan is forced to submit yet another renewal application, it will take USCIS another eight months to process it, according to the agency's website. Meanwhile, USCIS states that it is processing work permits and travel documents (which are primarily needed by illegal aliens seeking to launder their status) in three months' time. There can be no question that illegal aliens (followed by employers seeking foreign workers) are the priority for USCIS these days, not Americans and legal immigrants.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

the language used in this article is pretty heavy. 'vacations for illegals' ? that's an odd way of putting it, especially in comparison with the washington post article they're referring to.

i'm telling you, daca could get squashed right now and still nothing much is going to happen in the way of immigration reform.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is an election coming up, the focus surely is in doing whatever is best for the Dems re election.

“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

'Decentralized'. Sheesh. Me and my uscis month-mates suffered from that.

Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.