Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Karee

Hands Up!!

12 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

I'd like to see how this all started. The guy became absolutely moronic putting on a show.

What I don't understand is why they didn't arrest him? He obviously stole the merchandise since the loss prevention officer was pushing it back into the store at the end.


You can click on the 'X' to the right to ignore this signature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Other Timeline

What I don't understand is why they didn't arrest him? He obviously stole the merchandise since the loss prevention officer was pushing it back into the store at the end.

The excessive tolerance police must show is what is making Americans less safe. If that Wal Mart idiot was white then he would have been arrested immediately, Look what's happened to officer Wilson. A good policeman who will probably never be able to work in law enforcement for the rest of his life. The only deterrent to crime in America is fast, effective, and high profile law enforcement. These racial efforts underfoot are attempting to add so much political correctness to police work, that officers will be more inclined to ignore illegal activity in black communities for fear of retribution. Officer Wilson is the true victim of racial hatred and assassination.

Edited by ExExpat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Other Timeline

‘Absolutely Disgusting’: Keep a Close Eye on the Cop’s Reaction as a Black Friday Shopper Claims That He’s Being Harassed Like ‘Mike Brown’
255kpwl.jpg
“He knows who I am,” the shopper says of the officer, claiming that he shouldn’t have to show ID because, “[the officer is] the arresting officer on one of my cases.”
According to the video description posted on YouTube, the officer is Michael Manfredi of the South Strabane Police Department in Washington County, Pennsylvania.
The officer has apparently been called to the Wal-Mart by the store’s security team, and he calmly follows the shopper to the parking lot as the shopper loudly refuses to hand the officer his receipt.
2ihayc6.jpg
The shopper waves the receipt in front of the officer’s face, but he doesn’t allow the officer to hold the receipt or even take a picture of it.
Soon, despite no apparent aggression from the officer, the shopper starts running around the parking lot yelling at the top of his lungs.
“My hands are up!” the man starts shouting. “He’s trying to Mike Brown me!”
The police officer’s calm remains strong through the end of the encounter, when he allows the shopper to go free — even though the man kept refusing to let him hold the receipt.
On Reddit, commenters responded with disgust that someone would invoke the name of the slain Brown to justify not showing a cop a receipt on Black Friday.
“As someone who works Asset Protection at a retail store, I can almost guarantee that whoever was attempting to stop these two and got officers involved had probable cause to do so,” one person wrote on Reddit. “I’m assuming that this was on Black Friday and after purchasing some of their merchandise they went back into the store and placed a few more items into their cart and attempted to leave the store.”
The top comment on Reddit was more succinct: “Absolutely disgusting. He should be ashamed of himself.”
Another commenter speculated, “He’s probably too dumb to be ashamed, or more likely has his head too far up his own a** to hear anyone telling him so. F******g ridiculous idiot.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: Other Timeline

Officer has been falsely accused before:

Andre Cromwell v. Michael Manfredi, 10-4017 (3rd Cir. 2011)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Filed: March 11th, 2011
Status: Non-Precedential
Docket Number: 10-4017
Fingerprint: 84af11aa5b56b143496e527c52b2ad9d0477c243
BLD-123 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-4017
___________
ANDRE LAMONT CROMWELL, Appellant
v.
MICHAEL MANFREDI, Officer of South Strabane Police Department, South Strabane
Township, Washington, PA; CARL MARTIN, Officer of City of Washington Police
Department, Washington County, PA; JOHN C. PETTIT, former Washington County
District Attorney, Washington, PA; PATRICK LEARY, State Police Officer of
Washington County PA State Police Barracks, Washington, PA;
KENNETH WESTCOTT, Then Mayor of City of Washington, Pennsylvania;
CITY OF WASHINGTON PENNSYLVANIA;
STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA;
CITY OF WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, Washington County, Pennsylvania
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil No. 2:08-cv-01048)
District Judge: Honorable Joy Flowers Conti
____________________________________
Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or
Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6
February 25, 2011
Before: SLOVITER, JORDAN AND GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: March 11, 2011)
_________
OPINION
_________
PER CURIAM
Andre Cromwell, proceeding pro se, appeals from the District Court’s September
30, 2010 order dismissing his second amended complaint with prejudice. For the reasons
that follow, we will summarily affirm.
I.
Because we write for the parties, who are familiar with the background of this
case, we only briefly discuss that background here. In July 2008, Cromwell commenced
this civil rights action by filing a complaint in the District Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. He later filed an amended complaint in October 2008. The amended complaint,
which named 12 defendants and sought $200 million in damages, centered around a
November 8, 2006 incident involving Cromwell and two police officers — Defendants
Michael Manfredi and Carl Martin. Cromwell alleged that the two officers used
excessive force against him on that day, and that he was later maliciously prosecuted for
his conduct during the incident. He also alleged that several of the defendants had
conspired against him, and that the municipalities and police departments named as
defendants had failed to train their officers.
Several defendants ultimately moved to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). In August 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued a report
recommending that the District Court grant the various motions to dismiss and dismiss all
claims against all Defendants. In doing so, the Magistrate Judge concluded that
Cromwell’s excessive force claims lacked merit because (1) his allegations failed to show
2
that he had been seized under the Fourth Amendment, and (2) even if those allegations
did reflect a seizure, the officers were entitled to qualified immunity. The Magistrate
Judge also concluded that Cromwell’s malicious prosecution claims failed because the
criminal proceedings brought against him for his conduct on November 8, 2006, had not
ended in his favor.1 Finally, the Magistrate Judge concluded that because Cromwell’s
underlying constitutional claims lacked merit, his related conspiracy and failure to train
arguments necessarily failed as well. On September 17, 2009, the District Court adopted
the Magistrate Judge’s report and dismissed the complaint without prejudice to
Cromwell’s “right to file an amended complaint . . . to include factual allegations
sufficient to state claims.” (Dist. Ct. Order of Sept. 17, 2009, at 5.)
In January 2010, Cromwell filed his second amended complaint, naming fewer
defendants than he did in his previous complaint. A subset of those defendants
subsequently moved to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). In September 2010, the
Magistrate Judge issued a report recommending that the District Court grant the motions
and dismiss the case. In support of this recommendation, the Magistrate Judge stated that
“the second amended complaint does not state any new facts so as to take [it] outside of
the reasoning of the prior Report,” (Magistrate Judge’s Report entered on Sept. 7, 2010,
at 7), and that any further amendment of the pleadings would be futile. On September
30, 2010, the District Court adopted the Magistrate Judge’s report and dismissed
1
In December 2007, pursuant to an agreement with the Commonwealth,
Cromwell pleaded guilty to two counts of recklessly endangering another person. As part
3
Cromwell’s second amended complaint with prejudice. Cromwell now appeals from this
most recent order.
II.
We have jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We exercise
de novo review over the District Court’s dismissal of Cromwell’s case for failure to state
a claim. See Phillips v. County of Allegheny, 515 F.3d 224, 230 (3d Cir. 2008). In
conducting this review, “we accept as true all well-pled factual allegations in the
[plaintiff’s pleading] and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from them, and we
affirm the order of dismissal only if the pleading does not plausibly suggest an
entitlement to relief.” See Fellner v. Tri-Union Seafoods, L.L.C., 539 F.3d 237, 242 (3d
Cir. 2008).
Having reviewed the record and considered Cromwell’s arguments in support of
his appeal, and for substantially the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s two
thorough and well-reasoned reports — both of which the District Court adopted — we
agree with the District Court’s decision to dismiss Cromwell’s case with prejudice.
Because this appeal does not present a substantial question, we will summarily affirm the
District Court’s September 30, 2010 order. See 3d Cir. LAR 27.4; 3d Cir. I.O.P. 10.6.
Cromwell’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
of the agreement, the multiple aggravated assault charges against him were dropped.
4

https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/206615/andre-cromwell-v-michael-manfredi/

http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/pawdce/2:2008cv01048/87693/130

Edited by ExExpat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

Just more evidence about the exceeding amounts of patience required to deal with race baiters in America. After all this horseshit who in the hell would ever want to be a police officer?

I am unsure, also.

I hope more folk can become this type of officer, instead.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jujQG7TBOs


Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

it is. it was a skit, produced for Male Cancer Awareness foundation.

[no, I'm not kidding]


Sometimes my language usage seems confusing - please feel free to 'read it twice', just in case !
Ya know, you can find the answer to your question with the advanced search tool, when using a PC? Ditch the handphone, come back later on a PC, and try again.

-=-=-=-=-=R E A D ! ! !=-=-=-=-=-

Whoa Nelly ! Want NVC Info? see http://www.visajourney.com/wiki/index.php/NVC_Process

Congratulations on your approval ! We All Applaud your accomplishment with Most Wonderful Kissies !

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

The OP's video is an extremely disturbing example of the lunatics running the insane asylum. What I don't get is why those lowlifes posted this video. Do they think it makes them look good? Do they think it makes cops look bad? If so, they really are delusional.


Hillary Lied. People Died.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -


Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...