How myths wage war against the hungry

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

A California surfer dude has become the new “welfare queen.”

Before the House voted last week to slash food stamps by almost $40 million over the next 10 years, Politico reports, lawmakers from both parties received copies of a recent Fox News report entitled “The Great Food Stamp Binge.”

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/sep/26/how-myths-wage-war-against-hungry/

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Poor children ought to clean toilets in their schools for food. Veterans ought to just get their ####### together and the elderly on food stamps ought to go ahead and kick that damn bucket already.

I'd make such a good Republican!

[Danno 1,228]

"

How myths wage war against the hungry"

Not to nitpick but "wars" are acts of aggression by definition.

Before the "Great society" was ushered in by Johnson (an actual war) can it be said that the poor had been under in a state of war since our founding ... due to lack of cash payments up until that time?

Does my neighbor not supplying me with whatever I choose to buy at Trader Joe's mean he is at war with me?

So quit with the liberal wordage, you just end up looking silly to all but that 21% who claim to be liberal sheep.

I think it is safe to say, nearly everyone (except some diehard libertarians) believe in programs to aid those who can not help themselves.

Pimping poverty is big business al the way down the line from those who push such wasteful programs with teary eyes to the Agr businesses and then State level hucksters who dole these funds out through their campaign supporters (Community organizers) and then on down to those who don't even deserve to live off the backs of those who do work and contribute.

So no, there is no "war against the hungry", the actual war is against those who do the right things in life, as these people never end up in poverty yet are required to carry those who do.

[decocker 7,198]

nice to see nothing has changed around here..

[RGinWA 816]

What side would the Republican's be on during the French Revolution? Surely not the peasants. They'd want those poor b@stards slaughtered.

Survival of the fittest...or rich I mean.

[Danno 1,228]

What side would the Republican's be on during the French Revolution? Surely not the peasants. They'd want those poor b@stards slaughtered.

Survival of the fittest...or rich I mean.

Assuming that in all conflicts there must be a "right side or "wrong side."

[Darnell 8,478]

nice to see nothing has changed around here..

Welcome Back, We Missed You!

[Janelle2002 3,865]

Republicans hate the 47%. They've said this more than once. They would have tied cannons to peoples' ankles and dropped them in the ocean.

[elmcitymaven 9,712]

Nice necropost.

[GandD 5,966]

[We Keep Receipts 9,238]

I swear I didn't know reposting this in the other thread would bring it back to life. At least give me the box to play with...

[The Nature Boy 4,224]

A California surfer dude has become the new “welfare queen.”

Before the House voted last week to slash food stamps by almost $40 million over the next 10 years, Politico reports, lawmakers from both parties received copies of a recent Fox News report entitled “The Great Food Stamp Binge.”

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/sep/26/how-myths-wage-war-against-hungry/

why can't it just be simply that both are wrong.

I despise both equally.

Why does it always have to be about race. Nobody commented about this post, so it means we don't care if white people scam the Govt Jeez