Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Can an Au Pair be subject to 212 (e) by mistake?

5 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Please help!!! Subject to 212 (e) BY MISTAKE :'(((

I was a participant of InterExchange Au-Pair program and came to the US on a J1 visa. I believe US Embassy had erroneously subjected me to a Two-Year Home Country Physical Presence Requirement, also known as INA 212 (e). Neither square on my DS-2019 regarding 2-year rule is marked, but there is a stamp in my passport that reads "Bearer is subject to Section 212 (e)", which brings me to a conclusion that US Embassy made this determination based solely on the assumption that Au-Pair program in which I had participated was sponsored by the government.

There are three instances that may subject a J-1 visa holder to a 2-year rule: A. Government funded Exchange Program; B. Specialized knowledge or skill; or C. Graduate medical education/training. I was not a medical student when I participated in this program, nor did I come to the US to obtain such education or training; further, my country does not appear on the Exchange Visitor Skills list, which means that could not have been a basis for the 2-year rule and finally my participation in exchange program was not sponsored directly or indirectly by either American or my country's government, therefore Two-Year Home Country Physical Presence Requirement should not apply to me.

The reason that the visa officer assumed that I may be subject to this rule is because my pink form states that I was receiving financial support. What the officer did not know was that such support came from the host family that I was assigned to. If I was subject to this rule, the appropriate square on the pink form should have been marked. Moreover, if such selection is to be made, a basis for the rule also must be stated on the form according to three choices provided (A, B, or C). No such steps have been taken, which again shows that I should not have been subject to this rule.

I have consulted several attorneys but since none of them had dealt with this kind of situation in the past they suggested applying for a waiver which in my case would be impossible to get because my country no longer issues No Objection letters. No other basis for the waiver aply to me.

Thank you for any input you can provide!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where country are you from?

Relationship and I-130 Process

Sometime in October, 2011: We met online talking about Argentina.
Later in October: Met in person in Philadelphia and became good friends.
March 4, 2012: Became girlfriend and boyfriend, officially.
March 21: Gloria leaves the US at the end of her J-1 Visa.
April 9: Got engaged!
May 12-26: Chris visits Buenos Aires.
May 18: Got married in Argentina :) Happy day!!
May 29: Sent out I-130
June 4: NOA1 received.
August 17-20: Chris visits again.
September 22-29: Chris 3rd visit, Gloria's birthday!
November 11-January 5: Chris stays in Argentina almost 2 months, Gloria is happy!
December 28: NOA2 YAY!!!
December 31: Package received at NVC.
January 18, 2013: Got case # and IIN.
February 6: Case complete!!
February 11: Interview assigned.
February 25: Package received at Embassy in Buenos Aires.
March 18: Interview Approved!!
March 28: Visa received.
March 29: Houston POE

April 11: received greencard!!!!!!!

January 9, 2015: sent out form I-751

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, did you file an Advisory Opinion? My friend got "subject to 212(e) requirement" printed on her visa, and is actually not subject to it.

Original DS-2019 says not subject, and the Advisory Opinion explained the mistake.

I'm just like a point mass that can move through space but has no internal degrees of freedom.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

my fiance is an au pair from el salvador, she took like 3 part time english classes as part of the program but primarily worked as a nanny. will that make he part of the skills list? she wasn't even close to a full time student and no government funding involved. she has the two year requirement on her visa we are in process of requesting the advisory opinion. i don't know how a few classes makes you required to go home for two years. any hopes it was mistake?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.