Jump to content

115 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
(CNN) – The mother of a pregnant leukemia patient who died after her chemotherapy was delayed over anti- abortion laws is accusing doctors of not putting her daughter’s health first.

The 16-year-old’s plight attracted worldwide attention after she had to wait for chemotherapy because of an abortion ban in the Dominican Republic.

Doctors were hesitant to give her chemotherapy because such treatment could terminate the pregnancy – a violation of the Dominican Constitution, which bans abortion. Some 20 days after she was admitted to the hospital, she finally started receiving treatment.

She died Friday, a hospital official said.

While abortion is still legal in the US, many on the right would like to see that changed. Many states are making abortions so restrictive that it’s nearly impossible for a woman to find an abortion provider. Some states are outright banning abortion as soon as 18 weeks after conception. It’s not difficult to envision that a situation similar to the one in the Dominican Republic could happen in today’s United States.

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/08/18/pregnant-teen-denied-both-chemotherapy-and-abortion-dies-video/

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

Very sad

Sent I-129 Application to VSC 2/1/12
NOA1 2/8/12
RFE 8/2/12
RFE reply 8/3/12
NOA2 8/16/12
NVC received 8/27/12
NVC left 8/29/12
Manila Embassy received 9/5/12
Visa appointment & approval 9/7/12
Arrived in US 10/5/2012
Married 11/24/2012
AOS application sent 12/19/12

AOS approved 8/24/13

Filed: Timeline
Posted (edited)
While abortion is still legal in the US, many on the right would like to see that changed. Many states are making abortions so restrictive that it’s nearly impossible for a woman to find an abortion provider. Some states are outright banning abortion as soon as 18 weeks after conception. It’s not difficult to envision that a situation similar to the one in the Dominican Republic could happen in today’s United States.

And that to some is the arrival in the promised land. Sickos they are.

Edited by Mr. Big Dog
Filed: Timeline
Posted

You're a good soldier for the just cause. All that happened here was God's will. How dare people question God?

Hindsight is always 20/20.

In this case, both the mother and the fetus died. And now the media and Internet feminists are going to try to use this as yet another hammer with which to beat down the faithful.

I have a different way of looking at this.

Transport yourself back to the time when the mother had cancer and the fetus was viable and healthy. The outcome is not yet known.

What is known is that chemo, in the best case, may lengthen the mothers life with a significant chance of remission while damaging and/or killing the fetus.... in the worst case, chemo would have little impact on the mothers cancer while still doing irreparable harm to the fetus.

What would you decide then?

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Isle of Man
Timeline
Posted

What if the fetus had not miscarried and there was a live birth and the mom died of cancer some time later?

What would you have said then?

I would not be very optimistic for the motherless infant baby girl born in the Dominican Republic.

What would they do with her? Guess my answer would vary depending on the family/income structure of the now dead teenage girl. Are the grandparents around? I'm sure they are probably very young, 30s / 40s at best. A lot of unknowns to answer that but it is probably a good thing she is not around. Also, she got a free pass to Heaven.

FYI: A 9-week fetus is the size of a green olive. Just microscopically bigger than a raspberry. It weighs less than 2 grams. I do not feel sorry for "it" at all.

ETA: If I was the mother with Cancer, only 16 years old, and knew that Chemo would do a lot of damage to the fetus I would abort without hesitation and hopefully survive through Chemo.

India, gun buyback and steamroll.

qVVjt.jpg?3qVHRo.jpg?1

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Hindsight is always 20/20.

In this case, both the mother and the fetus died. And now the media and Internet feminists are going to try to use this as yet another hammer with which to beat down the faithful.

I have a different way of looking at this.

Transport yourself back to the time when the mother had cancer and the fetus was viable and healthy. The outcome is not yet known.

What is known is that chemo, in the best case, may lengthen the mothers life with a significant chance of remission while damaging and/or killing the fetus.... in the worst case, chemo would have little impact on the mothers cancer while still doing irreparable harm to the fetus.

What would you decide then?

I'd let the mother-to-be decide. It's her life.

Filed: Timeline
Posted

I would not be very optimistic for the motherless infant baby girl born in the Dominican Republic.

Children grow up without one or both parents all over the third world. Most of them live long enough to experience both happiness and heartbreak. They're human, just like you or I. You seem to suffer from the elitist first world delusion that one can not be happy without a smartphone and air conditioning and free school lunches, but I assure you that is not the case.

I'd let the mother-to-be decide. It's her life.

Even if her chances of survival with chemo are less than the fetus' chances of survival without?

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Isle of Man
Timeline
Posted

Children grow up without one or both parents all over the third world. Most of them live long enough to experience both happiness and heartbreak. They're human, just like you or I. You seem to suffer from the elitist first world delusion that one can not be happy without a smartphone and air conditioning and free school lunches, but I assure you that is not the case.

And on average, how do they turn out? Good, bad, or dead by 10...

India, gun buyback and steamroll.

qVVjt.jpg?3qVHRo.jpg?1

Filed: Timeline
Posted
Wow. That is, to me, an unimaginably callous response. I'm afraid the gap between you and I on this is too large to be bridged by further conversation.

So you want to tell the mother that she has less of a right to live than the embryo or fetus she is carrying. You want to sit there and say that you can make a better decision than the woman that's personally impacted by the decision. What gives you the right to sentence that woman to death?

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...