Jump to content
^_^

Should states be allowed to defend their own borders?

 Share

  

20 members have voted

  1. 1. Should states be allowed to defend their own borders?

    • Yes, with drunk-driving style checkpoints
    • Yes, with Fallujah style checkpoints
    • No, traffic between states should not be impeded


62 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

For English press one. We white folks are already pushed to the back #### is we are out numbered.

Drive around the county and pick up all the out of work hippies you see with cardboard signs looking for a free meal. Go pick lettuce down around Salinas. See how many you get, and how long they last working for a living.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Philippines
Timeline

Drive around the county and pick up all the out of work hippies you see with cardboard signs looking for a free meal. Go pick lettuce down around Salinas. See how many you get, and how long they last working for a living.

All the same to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

These check points are for drugs mostly and illegal immigrants coming up from mexico not to harass other Americans.

No they are not. They are run by the California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Health and Pest Prevention Services Division. They harass visitors from other states everyday, and their job is to exclude unwanted visitors.

In 2010, more than 27.5 million private vehicles and 7 million commercial vehicles were inspected at the BPS. From these vehicles, inspectors rejected over 82,000 lots of plant material (fruits, vegetables, plants, etc.) because they were in violation of California or federal plant quarantine laws.

http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/pe/ExteriorExclusion/borders.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Vietnam
Timeline

Drive around the county and pick up all the out of work hippies you see with cardboard signs looking for a free meal. Go pick lettuce down around Salinas. See how many you get, and how long they last working for a living.

We could just stop subsidizing agriculture. Do that and Mexico and Central America can supply the U.S. with most all we need agriculturally cheaply. Their nations would become more wealthy as a result. That would lead to less need for illegal immigration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

california-inspection.jpg

You mean like the above?

When I see this, it means my fun weekend in Las Vegas is over, I stopped in Baker for gas, snacks and a cold refreshment and home is only 3 hours away.

"The Marines I have seen around the world have the cleanest bodies, the filthiest minds, the highest morale, and the lowest morals of any group of animals I have ever seen. Thank God for the United States Marine Corps!" - Eleanor Roosevelt, First Lady of the United States, 1945.

"Retreat hell! We just got here!"

CAPT. LLOYD WILLIAMS, USMC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline

We could just stop subsidizing agriculture. Do that and Mexico and Central America can supply the U.S. with most all we need agriculturally cheaply. Their nations would become more wealthy as a result. That would lead to less need for illegal immigration.

And what do we do with all that land that suddenly gets freed up in flyover country? Without agriculture, those local economies will tumble. You can't do what they do out east and build condos on it because there won't be any demand out there without agro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Vietnam
Timeline

And what do we do with all that land that suddenly gets freed up in flyover country? Without agriculture, those local economies will tumble. You can't do what they do out east and build condos on it because there won't be any demand out there without agro.

The land will still be used for agriculture or ranching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country: Vietnam
Timeline

You think they can compete against South/Central America without subsidies without a complete dismantling of all regulatory burdens?

Some will be able to do so and others will throw in the towel. What regulatory burden will be dismantled?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...