Jump to content
Dakine

Front loading?

 Share

32 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Legacy members of VJ have long recommended some 'front loading' of petitions. It gives any CO a 'snapshot' of the relationship before he/she eyeballs the beneficiary.

Too many changes happen at Embassy and USCIS to make people who did the Visa Process years ago to really have relevant information.

Current Trends and recent posts will help people determine how to handle thier situation

If that is true, then we should see a significant decline in your daily postings

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Legacy members of VJ have long recommended some 'front loading' of petitions. It gives any CO a 'snapshot' of the relationship before he/she eyeballs the beneficiary.

Too many changes happen at Embassy and USCIS to make people who did the Visa Process years ago to really have relevant information.

Current Trends and recent posts will help people determine how to handle thier situation

Oh so anybody who went through the process more than - what - 6 months ago has nothing relevant to add?

:rofl:

Come on then, let's go out for coffee.

I guess not much has changed at all. :thumbs:

Now That You Are A Permanent Resident

How Do I Remove The Conditions On Permanent Residence Based On Marriage?

Welcome to the United States: A Guide For New Immigrants

Yes, even this last one.. stuff in there that not even your USC knows.....

Here are more links that I love:

Arriving in America, The POE Drill

Dual Citizenship FAQ

Other Fora I Post To:

alt.visa.us.marriage-based http://britishexpats.com/ and www.***removed***.com

censored link = *family based immigration* website

Inertia. Is that the Greek god of 'can't be bothered'?

Met, married, immigrated, naturalized.

I-130 filed Aug02

USC Jul06

No Deje Piedras Sobre El Pavimento!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
Legacy members of VJ have long recommended some 'front loading' of petitions. It gives any CO a 'snapshot' of the relationship before he/she eyeballs the beneficiary.

Too many changes happen at Embassy and USCIS to make people who did the Visa Process years ago to really have relevant information.

Current Trends and recent posts will help people determine how to handle thier situation

Oh so anybody who went through the process more than - what - 6 months ago has nothing relevant to add?

:rofl:

Come on then, let's go out for coffee.

I guess not much has changed at all. :thumbs:

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
I prefer front loaders. Much more efficient, especially the HE models.

I much prefer a top-loader myself

Really? I'm curious as to why they are liked so much over here in the USA. Maybe I'm just not used to them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
I thought a front-loader was a kind of bra?
It's important to keep abreast of such distinctions.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
It just seems like top-loaders have more room in them than front-loaders.

Then of course, there's this sort of Toploader:

That was TOTALLY uncalled for and I'm sure against the TOS somewhere. If it isn't, then it should be! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline

I don't know about the rest of you "old timers" (not legacy) members but, I get tired of these chopf**ks ,who have just enough time in to be dangerous, trying to claim thier knowledge is more relevant than ours. I don't claim I know it all. And it seems to me, those who really DO have a lot of knowledge do NOT claim to know everything either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
I don't know about the rest of you "old timers" (not legacy) members but, I get tired of these chopf**ks ,who have just enough time in to be dangerous, trying to claim thier knowledge is more relevant than ours.
To whom do you refer, and about which of the topics in this thread?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...