Jump to content

31 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted (edited)
Led Light bulbs are available now, only online. They last for approximately 50+ years. Consumes less than CFL. However, they're more expensive.

The wavelength and quality of light from LED's aren't yet mature enought to compete with CFL's and especially incandecent lamps.....

NickD, the circuitry you refer to is called the "ballast" of the lamp and doesn't employ an inverter as almost all CFL's use DC, not AC to produce the ARC Discharge, and then regulate the current through the tube.

Here's a typical schematic of a typical solid state ballast (click on hi-res), but there's a multitude of different approaches to achieve the same result........

I can completely relate to your complaints about the reliability of CFL's as I've gone through a few myself. I'm not sure those that tout these devices for their (theoretical) lifespan are aware of the weak link within, the Ballast........

Edited by *entitlements_yay
miss_me_yet.jpg
Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Cambodia
Timeline
Posted
Led Light bulbs are available now, only online. They last for approximately 50+ years. Consumes less than CFL. However, they're more expensive.

The wavelength and quality of light from LED's aren't yet mature enought to compete with CFL's and especially incandecent lamps.....

NickD, the circuitry you refer to is called the "ballast" of the lamp and doesn't employ an inverter as almost all CFL's use DC, not AC to produce the ARC Discharge, and then regulate the current through the tube.

Here's a typical schematic of a typical solid state ballast (click on hi-res), but there's a multitude of different approaches to achieve the same result........

I can completely relate to your complaints about the reliability of CFL's as I've gone through a few myself. I'm not sure those that tout these devices for their (theoretical) lifespan are aware of the weak link within, the Ballast........

The setup consists of mutiple LEDs with each bulb directed a seperate direction. This will create an illusion of 360 degree light. I've used them.

LEDs have matured, it's just the p-n junction cannot produce more wattage due to the size of the diode without producing heat within tolerable range. The p-n junction will not work if the temperature exceeds its limit.

mooninitessomeonesetusupp6.jpg

Posted
Led Light bulbs are available now, only online. They last for approximately 50+ years. Consumes less than CFL. However, they're more expensive.

The wavelength and quality of light from LED's aren't yet mature enought to compete with CFL's and especially incandecent lamps.....

NickD, the circuitry you refer to is called the "ballast" of the lamp and doesn't employ an inverter as almost all CFL's use DC, not AC to produce the ARC Discharge, and then regulate the current through the tube.

Here's a typical schematic of a typical solid state ballast (click on hi-res), but there's a multitude of different approaches to achieve the same result........

I can completely relate to your complaints about the reliability of CFL's as I've gone through a few myself. I'm not sure those that tout these devices for their (theoretical) lifespan are aware of the weak link within, the Ballast........

The setup consists of mutiple LEDs with each bulb directed a seperate direction. This will create an illusion of 360 degree light. I've used them.

LEDs have matured, it's just the p-n junction cannot produce more wattage due to the size of the diode without producing heat within tolerable range. The p-n junction will not work if the temperature exceeds its limit.

It has nothing to do with the direction of the light emitted but rather the wavelength of light. LED's still have a relatively narrow wavelength and produce a light that is artificial, or more so than incandecent or flourecent and most people find it intolerable.

What I said also has nothing to do with the geometry or physical limitations of the p-n junction in specific devices.

Wavelength refers to the spectrum, or color of emitted visible light...... The best is still the original incandecent lamps, followed by I believe the halogen lamps, then flourecents........

LED's have found niche applications such as wide spread use in tail lights and brake lights of cars and trucks.

miss_me_yet.jpg
Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Cambodia
Timeline
Posted (edited)
Led Light bulbs are available now, only online. They last for approximately 50+ years. Consumes less than CFL. However, they're more expensive.

The wavelength and quality of light from LED's aren't yet mature enought to compete with CFL's and especially incandecent lamps.....

NickD, the circuitry you refer to is called the "ballast" of the lamp and doesn't employ an inverter as almost all CFL's use DC, not AC to produce the ARC Discharge, and then regulate the current through the tube.

Here's a typical schematic of a typical solid state ballast (click on hi-res), but there's a multitude of different approaches to achieve the same result........

I can completely relate to your complaints about the reliability of CFL's as I've gone through a few myself. I'm not sure those that tout these devices for their (theoretical) lifespan are aware of the weak link within, the Ballast........

The setup consists of mutiple LEDs with each bulb directed a seperate direction. This will create an illusion of 360 degree light. I've used them.

LEDs have matured, it's just the p-n junction cannot produce more wattage due to the size of the diode without producing heat within tolerable range. The p-n junction will not work if the temperature exceeds its limit.

It has nothing to do with the direction of the light emitted but rather the wavelength of light. LED's still have a relatively narrow wavelength and produce a light that is artificial, or more so than incandecent or flourecent and most people find it intolerable.

What I said also has nothing to do with the geometry or physical limitations of the p-n junction in specific devices.

Wavelength refers to the spectrum, or color of emitted visible light...... The best is still the original incandecent lamps, followed by I believe the halogen lamps, then flourecents........

LED's have found niche applications such as wide spread use in tail lights and brake lights of cars and trucks.

The visible light is created by a little bit higher wattage. Therefore, the pn-junction limits the operating temperature of the diode. However, by using constructive interference and a mirror and different geometric arrangement LEDs can be used as a replacement for regular light bulbs.

The Fourier Transform for the wave of the light ray can be manipulated depending on how much input we have.

Edited by Niels Bohr

mooninitessomeonesetusupp6.jpg

Posted
Led Light bulbs are available now, only online. They last for approximately 50+ years. Consumes less than CFL. However, they're more expensive.

The wavelength and quality of light from LED's aren't yet mature enought to compete with CFL's and especially incandecent lamps.....

NickD, the circuitry you refer to is called the "ballast" of the lamp and doesn't employ an inverter as almost all CFL's use DC, not AC to produce the ARC Discharge, and then regulate the current through the tube.

Here's a typical schematic of a typical solid state ballast (click on hi-res), but there's a multitude of different approaches to achieve the same result........

I can completely relate to your complaints about the reliability of CFL's as I've gone through a few myself. I'm not sure those that tout these devices for their (theoretical) lifespan are aware of the weak link within, the Ballast........

The setup consists of mutiple LEDs with each bulb directed a seperate direction. This will create an illusion of 360 degree light. I've used them.

LEDs have matured, it's just the p-n junction cannot produce more wattage due to the size of the diode without producing heat within tolerable range. The p-n junction will not work if the temperature exceeds its limit.

It has nothing to do with the direction of the light emitted but rather the wavelength of light. LED's still have a relatively narrow wavelength and produce a light that is artificial, or more so than incandecent or flourecent and most people find it intolerable.

What I said also has nothing to do with the geometry or physical limitations of the p-n junction in specific devices.

Wavelength refers to the spectrum, or color of emitted visible light...... The best is still the original incandecent lamps, followed by I believe the halogen lamps, then flourecents........

LED's have found niche applications such as wide spread use in tail lights and brake lights of cars and trucks.

The visible light is created by a little bit higher wattage. Therefore, the pn-junction limits the operating temperature of the diode. However, by using constructive interference and a mirror and different geometric arrangement LEDs can be used as a replacement for regular light bulbs.

The Fourier Transform for the wave of the light ray can be manipulated depending on how much input we have.

LOL! You make a better forum mole than an engineer! :bonk:

miss_me_yet.jpg
Posted
I replaced all of the bulbs in my house 3 years ago with CFL's and haven't had a single problem. The only thing that annoys me is the bathroom lights (4 of them, the bulb type that mount over a mirror) for some reason take about 20 seconds to spin up. They start really dim and spool up to full brightness. None of my other bulbs do that.

Should mention, I purchased all Sylvania CFL's, maybe that's the wrong brand to buy. Do have many 40 watt fluorescent tubes in my lab, some all are over 25 years old, made in the USA with the old fashion heavy ballast transformer and the starters, those have been 100% reliable. Did purchase a Made in China with an electronic ballast recently, piece of #######.

Those Sylvanias' sure have a dim problem, worthless for trying to find something in a hurry, have to bring a flashlight.

I've had a couple bulbs burn out, but being a very old building, the quality of the electric system is iffy. Which has probably contributed to the burned out bulbs.

I've used two different brands and have had better luck with Ikea bulbs, although they seem to take a bit longer to warm up.

keTiiDCjGVo

Posted
I should've said the higher brigtness in regular light bulbs requires higher wattage. The wavelength of light can be easily adjusted by the varying frequency of it.

You cannot vary the frequency of light from an LED device as it's fixed by the physics of the device. Here's a link to a place where I buy my LED's for my "50 year" Fiber-optic Christmas tree.... I have to replace at least 2 "50 year" LED's a season....LOL

When there at the site click on the LED's link and you see that all devices range from 400nm to around 900nm.

They also have a myriad of household fixture devices as you describe but as I said before, as with a lot of immature technologies and assoiciated applications, they're simply not there yet in terms of competing with other more common devices such as CFL's and incandecent lamps........

miss_me_yet.jpg
Filed: Citizen (pnd) Country: Cambodia
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Yeah, you're right about that you can't adjust the frequency because it's fixed. Dimmers don't work well with them as I've seen. You can trick it by having filters on the light from the LED. Hmmm....

Well, my LED hasn't burn out yet. I reduced the amount of voltage going into the LED. The LED still reach it's linear region of operation with it. I play it safe not to apply a voltage to it's saturation region of operation. I know in the labs I've blown away a few LEDs because the DC power supply has a margin error within its circuit.

Although, I've seen the Motorola LED 7" mini-TV also at the lab. I'm tempting to ask the boss if I can play around with it.

Edited by Niels Bohr

mooninitessomeonesetusupp6.jpg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

Hmmmm, have to contact my associates and rewrite the book that an inverter transformer can transform pure DC to the filaments of a fluorescent tube. this transformer has a primary excited by a push pull transistor circuit consisting of two DD128F bipolar transistors with secondary feedback. Course if anything fouls up in that feedback circuit, circuit won't oscillate driving one of the transistors into saturation that will blow the protective fuse. Ballast is a term adopted from the old fluorescent, essentially an inductor or a choke that limits the ionization current that operates directly off of line voltage. Have seen the word ballast used for the newer inverter circuits, but feel it is being used incorrectly like so many other electronic terms.

LED's are man made devices, the chips are metalized with the leads ultrasonically welded, some not so good. Earlier ones emitted IR with a phosporous coating of different colors to emit visible wavelengths. Latest ones emit blue with a whitest phorporous coating to emulate white light.

Whether incandescence bulbs waste energy depends upon the application. When it's sub zero outside, and the energy cost of electricity is almost the same as natural gas, the heat energy is helping you to heat your home, so is not wasted. But during the cooling season, then it's lights out.

Posted

It's truly challenging to be truly "green".

Don't get me started. Hahaha!

CFLs are dangerous to dispose.

They contain mercury.

Mercury is scary...read about how it gets absorbed in your skin if you touch it, and how little it takes to make you sick.

1/70th of a teaspoon of mercury in a lake gets so polluted that the fish cannot be eaten for a year.

And so, throwing them in the trash might not be the way to go.

My partner had bought some and has had them working in his (now our) house for over a year, maybe two.

We still have some incandescent light bulbs in use too.

I think LEDs might be the best way to go, as they last "forever", stay cool to the touch and a little goes a long way (very bright).

I have had a Petzl (head lamp) for years and have yet to burn it out. :thumbs:

To those of you that in seriousness and in jest use the term hippie to label anyone trying to not destroy the Earth: :bonk:

:lol: :lol: :lol:

SpiritAlight edits due to extreme lack of typing abilities. :)

You will do foolish things.

Do them with enthusiasm!!

Don't just do something. Sit there.

K1: Flew to the U.S. of A. – January 9th, 2008 (HELLO CHI-TOWN!!! I'm here.)

Tied the knot (legal ceremony, part one) – January 26th, 2008 (kinda spontaneous)

AOS: Mailed V-Day; received February 15th, 2007 – phew!

I-485 application transferred to CSC – March 12th, 2008

Travel/Work approval notices via email – April 23rd, 2008

Green card/residency card: email notice of approval – August 28th, 2008 yippeeeee!!!

Funny-looking card arrives – September 6th, 2008 :)

Mailed request to remove conditions – July 7, 2010

Landed permanent resident approved – August 23rd, 2010

Second funny looking card arrives – August 31st, 2010

Over & out, Spirit

Posted

To those of you that in seriousness and in jest use the term hippie to label anyone trying to not destroy the Earth...

sister, i was a Hippie....all my friends were hippies..i had hippie friends..and you young lady are a wannabe hippie...

just joking little spirit sister

Peace to All creatures great and small............................................

But when we turn to the Hebrew literature, we do not find such jokes about the donkey. Rather the animal is known for its strength and its loyalty to its master (Genesis 49:14; Numbers 22:30).

Peppi_drinking_beer.jpg

my burro, bosco ..enjoying a beer in almaty

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...st&id=10835

Posted
Led Light bulbs are available now, only online. They last for approximately 50+ years. Consumes less than CFL. However, they're more expensive.

I saw some at Sams Club.

They are the way of the future and also safe to use. You practically need a hazmat team if a CFL breaks in your house.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Posted
Made in China #######, all of it, no name brand components were found. No overvoltage or transient protection, save the fuse, but once that is blown, the bulb is history.

I always wondered why companies never bothered giving people the option to pay more and buy locally made electronics. Much like water heaters where you get to pick the quality and life of the product, I would pay more for higher quality made in America products.

So lets assume a CFL costs 80 cents from China. I would be willing to pay $1.25 for the same globe if I new I could get it from America, manufactured by Americans and using better quality components. Why no company gives you this option is beyond me. I call it the Whole Foods model. There will always be people like myself who are willing to pay for the better quality and at the same time help our local economy.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...