Jump to content

30 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Turkey
Timeline
Posted (edited)

Just curious why it is easier for women to be granted U.S. visas, namely fiance and spousal visas, as compared to men?

Is there just a gender bias where it seems more acceptable for American men to petition foreign women as opposed to American women petitioning foreign men? Or is it because of more practical reasons, such as criminal convictions and potential terrorism connections?

To me, on the basis of marriage fraud, it seems that there are probably more foreign women marrying for visas and green cards than foreign men, on the whole.

Just curious what everyone's take on that is :whistle:

Edited by JULIAFERNO

shoes-1.jpg

tt3083899fltt.gif

AOS Timeline:

- 06/30/2009: Filed for AOS/EAD/AP

- 07/02/2009: AOS packet received

- 07/08/2009: Check cashed

- 07/10/2009: Received all 3 NOA1s

- 07/14/2009: Received biometrics appt.

- 07/29/2009: Case transferred to CSC

- 08/01/2009: Advanced Parole Documents Issued

- 08/06/2009: Biometrics appointment completed

- 08/11/2009: EAD issued (received 8/14)

- 11/12/2009: AOS approved

- 11/20/2009: Green Card in hand!

* Complete timeline in profile under "Signature and Story"

Filed: Country: Jamaica
Timeline
Posted
Just curious why it is easier for women to be granted U.S. visas, namely fiance and spousal visas, as compared to men?

Is there just a gender bias where it seems more acceptable for American men to petition foreign women as opposed to American women petitioning foreign men? Or is it because of more practical reasons, such as criminal convictions and potential terrorism connections?

To me, on the basis of marriage fraud, it seems that there are probably more foreign women marrying for visas and green cards than foreign men, on the whole.

Just curious what everyone's take on that is :whistle:

Don't see it in the Jamaican threads. Almost exclusively men granted visas.

Life's just a crazy ride on a run away train

You can't go back for what you've missed

So make it count, hold on tight find a way to make it right

You only get one trip

So make it good, make it last 'cause it all flies by so fast

You only get one trip

Posted

It's a consiracy I tell ya!!!

4-29-08 - Mailed I-130 & I-129F together to CSC

CSC

I-130 I-129F

5-01-08 - NOA1 5-02-08 - NOA1

5-04-08 - Touched 5-06-08 - Touched

5-05-08 - Rcvd NOA1 in mail 5-08-08 - Rcvd NOA1 in mail

5-14-08 - Touched 5-14-08 - Touched

5-20-08 - Touched

5-29-08 - NOA2................................5-29-08 - NOA2

5-30-08 - Touched............................5-30-08 - Touched

6-02-08 - Rcvd NOA2 hardcopy..........6-02-08 - Rcvd NOA2 hardcopy

NVC

6-05-08 - NVC rcvd, new # & IIN.......6-04-08 - NVC rcvd, new #

6-15-08 - NVC invoiced AOS..............6-09-08 - Shipped DHL to Bs. As.

6-15-08 - Paid AOS online..................6-11-08 - Dlvd to Embassy

6-15-08 - Sent DS-3032 email...........6-17-08 - Received e-mail Packet 3

6-17-08 - AOS shows PAID!!!............6-25-08 - Turnned in Packet 3

6-17-08 - Sent AOS pkg Fed Ex.........7-11-08 - Medical

6-23-08 - DS-3032 accepted..............8-14-08 - Interview!!!

6-26-08 - NVC says my I-864EZ is not original Signature (BS!!!)

6-28-08 - IV bill invoiced online.

7-01-08 - Paid IV Bill online

7-01-08 - Re-sent I-864EZ

7-02-08 - IV Bill show "Paid"

7-02-08 - NVC Received I-864EZ, again!!

7-03-08 - Sent DS-230 via FedEx.

7-03-08 - NVC recieves and enters new I-864EZ

7-07-08 - NVC receives and enters DS-230

7-16-08 - CASE COMPLETE!!!!

8-14-08 - Interview. APPROVED!!!!!!!!!!!

8-19-08 - POE, Washington DC.

Filed: Country: India
Timeline
Posted

I dont think what you are saying is true... I honestly think it is more LOCATION based. on where there may be more prejudice in the acceptance. Not in whole. I think the problem is not within our beliefs here in this country but.. what is acceptable in other countries..

Where/how do you base your statement?

Love isn't love unless it is expressed;

caring isn't caring unless the other person knows;

sharing isn't sharing unless the other person is included

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Argentina
Timeline
Posted
Just curious why it is easier for women to be granted U.S. visas, namely fiance and spousal visas, as compared to men?

Is there just a gender bias where it seems more acceptable for American men to petition foreign women as opposed to American women petitioning foreign men? Or is it because of more practical reasons, such as criminal convictions and potential terrorism connections?

To me, on the basis of marriage fraud, it seems that there are probably more foreign women marrying for visas and green cards than foreign men, on the whole.

Just curious what everyone's take on that is :whistle:

What makes you say that? The requirements are the same...:)

Saludos,

Caro

***Justin And Caro***
Happily married and enjoying our life together!

Filed: Other Country: India
Timeline
Posted

I agree it's partially location based. Cultural can influence the officer's decision but it doesn't always. My husband got the visa in India without a problem, but I have read of others who had problems. Your proof and red flags are also going to matter. Certain countries do have more fraud and therefore don't give out visas the same way they might in places with low fraud. It's not just men who have the issue.

Married since 9-18-04(All K1 visa & GC details in timeline.)

Ishu tum he mere Prabhu:::Jesus you are my Lord

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Turkey
Timeline
Posted

My opinions are purely subjective and based off of what I've seen on these forums. I feel like we see a lot more men, across the board, being placed in AP or being denied visas, but maybe my perception is bias as my fiance is from Turkey and I tend to focus on the cases in that region. I just can't help but believe that if I were the man and my fiance the woman and our case was exactly the same that he would have his visa already! But you are probably right that it is region-based.

shoes-1.jpg

tt3083899fltt.gif

AOS Timeline:

- 06/30/2009: Filed for AOS/EAD/AP

- 07/02/2009: AOS packet received

- 07/08/2009: Check cashed

- 07/10/2009: Received all 3 NOA1s

- 07/14/2009: Received biometrics appt.

- 07/29/2009: Case transferred to CSC

- 08/01/2009: Advanced Parole Documents Issued

- 08/06/2009: Biometrics appointment completed

- 08/11/2009: EAD issued (received 8/14)

- 11/12/2009: AOS approved

- 11/20/2009: Green Card in hand!

* Complete timeline in profile under "Signature and Story"

Posted

Because we don't want more men in our country!! We want more women!!!!! :thumbs:

4-29-08 - Mailed I-130 & I-129F together to CSC

CSC

I-130 I-129F

5-01-08 - NOA1 5-02-08 - NOA1

5-04-08 - Touched 5-06-08 - Touched

5-05-08 - Rcvd NOA1 in mail 5-08-08 - Rcvd NOA1 in mail

5-14-08 - Touched 5-14-08 - Touched

5-20-08 - Touched

5-29-08 - NOA2................................5-29-08 - NOA2

5-30-08 - Touched............................5-30-08 - Touched

6-02-08 - Rcvd NOA2 hardcopy..........6-02-08 - Rcvd NOA2 hardcopy

NVC

6-05-08 - NVC rcvd, new # & IIN.......6-04-08 - NVC rcvd, new #

6-15-08 - NVC invoiced AOS..............6-09-08 - Shipped DHL to Bs. As.

6-15-08 - Paid AOS online..................6-11-08 - Dlvd to Embassy

6-15-08 - Sent DS-3032 email...........6-17-08 - Received e-mail Packet 3

6-17-08 - AOS shows PAID!!!............6-25-08 - Turnned in Packet 3

6-17-08 - Sent AOS pkg Fed Ex.........7-11-08 - Medical

6-23-08 - DS-3032 accepted..............8-14-08 - Interview!!!

6-26-08 - NVC says my I-864EZ is not original Signature (BS!!!)

6-28-08 - IV bill invoiced online.

7-01-08 - Paid IV Bill online

7-01-08 - Re-sent I-864EZ

7-02-08 - IV Bill show "Paid"

7-02-08 - NVC Received I-864EZ, again!!

7-03-08 - Sent DS-230 via FedEx.

7-03-08 - NVC recieves and enters new I-864EZ

7-07-08 - NVC receives and enters DS-230

7-16-08 - CASE COMPLETE!!!!

8-14-08 - Interview. APPROVED!!!!!!!!!!!

8-19-08 - POE, Washington DC.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Turkey
Timeline
Posted

Hehe...that's what I'm wondering! If our cultural perceptions are a factor in the process, or if it is purely pragmatic. Maybe this sounds sexist of me, and by no means is this my belief, but perhaps it is more acceptable to grant more women visas as they may be more likely to not pursue employment and simply be supported by their husbands, whereas men are more likely to pursue employment, which is not necessarily a good thing for our economy right now. Just a theory.

My father's wife is Ukrainian and came here on a fiance visa 7-8 years ago and has not worked a day since she has been in the states. I'm sure everyone would find that unacceptable of my fiance once he arrives.

shoes-1.jpg

tt3083899fltt.gif

AOS Timeline:

- 06/30/2009: Filed for AOS/EAD/AP

- 07/02/2009: AOS packet received

- 07/08/2009: Check cashed

- 07/10/2009: Received all 3 NOA1s

- 07/14/2009: Received biometrics appt.

- 07/29/2009: Case transferred to CSC

- 08/01/2009: Advanced Parole Documents Issued

- 08/06/2009: Biometrics appointment completed

- 08/11/2009: EAD issued (received 8/14)

- 11/12/2009: AOS approved

- 11/20/2009: Green Card in hand!

* Complete timeline in profile under "Signature and Story"

Posted
Just curious why it is easier for women to be granted U.S. visas, namely fiance and spousal visas, as compared to men?

Is there just a gender bias where it seems more acceptable for American men to petition foreign women as opposed to American women petitioning foreign men? Or is it because of more practical reasons, such as criminal convictions and potential terrorism connections?

To me, on the basis of marriage fraud, it seems that there are probably more foreign women marrying for visas and green cards than foreign men, on the whole.

Just curious what everyone's take on that is :whistle:

Arab Men are likely to have a partial match or match to a name on a terrorist watch list. If the embassy can't sufficiently clear that person, they will opt to deny a visa rather than let a possible terrorist in.

Women from certain Asian countries can have a hard time getting through the immigration system, for completely diffrent reasons. Which is a high incidence of visa fraud.

The countries that are difficult to immigrate through are for some reason unique to that country or region.

keTiiDCjGVo

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Turkey
Timeline
Posted
Arab Men are likely to have a partial match or match to a name on a terrorist watch list. If the embassy can't sufficiently clear that person, they will opt to deny a visa rather than let a possible terrorist in.

Women from certain Asian countries can have a hard time getting through the immigration system, for completely diffrent reasons. Which is a high incidence of visa fraud.

The countries that are difficult to immigrate through are for some reason unique to that country or region.

Hmmm...which is why I can't figure out why my fiance is in AP. Turkey is not an Arabic country (although it is predominantly Muslim) nor does my fiance have an Arabic name (it is solely Turkish and based off of the Turkish language). But, AP does seem to be becoming more common for males in Turkey, especially in the last year.

shoes-1.jpg

tt3083899fltt.gif

AOS Timeline:

- 06/30/2009: Filed for AOS/EAD/AP

- 07/02/2009: AOS packet received

- 07/08/2009: Check cashed

- 07/10/2009: Received all 3 NOA1s

- 07/14/2009: Received biometrics appt.

- 07/29/2009: Case transferred to CSC

- 08/01/2009: Advanced Parole Documents Issued

- 08/06/2009: Biometrics appointment completed

- 08/11/2009: EAD issued (received 8/14)

- 11/12/2009: AOS approved

- 11/20/2009: Green Card in hand!

* Complete timeline in profile under "Signature and Story"

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted
Just curious why it is easier for women to be granted U.S. visas, namely fiance and spousal visas, as compared to men?

Is there just a gender bias where it seems more acceptable for American men to petition foreign women as opposed to American women petitioning foreign men? Or is it because of more practical reasons, such as criminal convictions and potential terrorism connections?

To me, on the basis of marriage fraud, it seems that there are probably more foreign women marrying for visas and green cards than foreign men, on the whole.

Just curious what everyone's take on that is :whistle:

Arab Men are likely to have a partial match or match to a name on a terrorist watch list. If the embassy can't sufficiently clear that person, they will opt to deny a visa rather than let a possible terrorist in.

Women from certain Asian countries can have a hard time getting through the immigration system, for completely diffrent reasons. Which is a high incidence of visa fraud.

The countries that are difficult to immigrate through are for some reason unique to that country or region.

I agree. I'm sure if someone was keeping track of the statistic, I'd guess that more K-1 visas from the Philippines are placed on Adminitrative Review than from other countries. I did read somewhere though that 70 percent of K visas come from the Philippines.

Posted

And go look over on vietnam's area or china's etc. A lot of immigrants from those countries are women and are often placed on AP. I think it depends on the embassy, not the sex of the person. For instance, my husband had no problems (along with most other men) going through the UK, but that is a low fraud embassy where almost no one ever gets denied or AP. It's embassy driven and some embassies are predominately one sex or the other.

Timeline

AOS

Mailed AOS, EAD and AP Sept 11 '07

Recieved NOA1's for all Sept 23 or 24 '07

Bio appt. Oct. 24 '07

EAD/AP approved Nov 26 '07

Got the AP Dec. 3 '07

AOS interview Feb 7th (5 days after the 1 year anniversary of our K1 NOA1!

Stuck in FBI name checks...

Got the GC July '08

Filed: Other Country: India
Timeline
Posted
Just curious why it is easier for women to be granted U.S. visas, namely fiance and spousal visas, as compared to men?

Is there just a gender bias where it seems more acceptable for American men to petition foreign women as opposed to American women petitioning foreign men? Or is it because of more practical reasons, such as criminal convictions and potential terrorism connections?

To me, on the basis of marriage fraud, it seems that there are probably more foreign women marrying for visas and green cards than foreign men, on the whole.

Just curious what everyone's take on that is :whistle:

Arab Men are likely to have a partial match or match to a name on a terrorist watch list. If the embassy can't sufficiently clear that person, they will opt to deny a visa rather than let a possible terrorist in.

Women from certain Asian countries can have a hard time getting through the immigration system, for completely diffrent reasons. Which is a high incidence of visa fraud.

The countries that are difficult to immigrate through are for some reason unique to that country or region.

I agree. I'm sure if someone was keeping track of the statistic, I'd guess that more K-1 visas from the Philippines are placed on Adminitrative Review than from other countries. I did read somewhere though that 70 percent of K visas come from the Philippines.

Really!? That's a lot.

Married since 9-18-04(All K1 visa & GC details in timeline.)

Ishu tum he mere Prabhu:::Jesus you are my Lord

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...