Obama's Dimestore 'Mein Kampf'

[HAL 9000 96]

I somehow doubt that Ann has read Mein Kampf either...

It's Ann Coulter. She probably has. Where do you think she gets her anger from?

Probably from her miserable failure of a personal life.

Honestly none of our concern unless she, like so many others with sociopathic problems, decide to highlight others' tragedies as a centerpiece of their smear attacks for benefit of I have no clue.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

True - and I totally can't justify that comment.

But hey - its a pretty accurate characterisation of something she would say

[HAL 9000 96]

True - and I totally can't justify that comment.

But hey - its a pretty accurate characterisation of something she would say

Exactly my point there... pretty sick of her to make them- YES... and pretty disgusting for people out there to be so receptive to that kind of logic. Just goes to show you how some people can be on the inside.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

I somehow doubt that Ann has read Mein Kampf either...

It's Ann Coulter. She probably has. Where do you think she gets her anger from?

Probably from her miserable failure of a personal life.

More likely from your jealousy and envy of her. Her fame just pisses you off is all. While your tiny little voice is only heard and barely noticed on an obscure forum such as this.

The mere recognition of your voice here makes you feel BIG! All the while knowing your nothing more than a speck of dirt in the scheme of things.

The more you speak the more minute you become! Yet in denial you still mouth off and become smaller and smaller.

Edited April 11, 2008 by CarolsMarc

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I somehow doubt that Ann has read Mein Kampf either...

It's Ann Coulter. She probably has. Where do you think she gets her anger from?

Probably from her miserable failure of a personal life.

More likely from your jealousy and envy of her. Her fame just pisses you off is all. While your tiny little voice is only heard and barely noticed on an obscure forum such as this.

The mere recognition of your voice here makes you feel BIG! All the while knowing your nothing more than a speck of dirt in the scheme of things.

The more you speak the more minute you become! Yet in denial you still mouth off and become smaller and smaller.

As I said...

[Trompe le Monde 1,107]

You mean when I called you out on your spamming of the board with anti-Obama topics.... I believe it was 10 in one day. NOW you know WHY we are having a discussion about creating a new subforum for political topics. Yep....you're the #1 offender. You voted "No" for the subforum that YOU are responsible for. You've denied your own child. How thoughtful.

You are kidding me, right? If I look at metta's post history I see 5 topics posted in one day, not 10.

Other members start more threads in one day, often of a political nature and certainly about particular candidates. Is it only spamming when they post negative pieces about YOUR candidate? Is this why this whole seperate forum for politics is being initiated, because one member posts multiple threads about a topic that YOU don't like.

That really stinks to high heaven. I'm beginning to think Kaydee is right when he talks about intolerance on the left.

[Ban Hammer 14,269]

That really stinks to high heaven. I'm beginning to think Kaydee is right when he talks about intolerance on the left.

yay kaydee!

[HAL 9000 96]

You mean when I called you out on your spamming of the board with anti-Obama topics.... I believe it was 10 in one day. NOW you know WHY we are having a discussion about creating a new subforum for political topics. Yep....you're the #1 offender. You voted "No" for the subforum that YOU are responsible for. You've denied your own child. How thoughtful.

You are kidding me, right? If I look at metta's post history I see 5 topics posted in one day, not 10.

Other members start more threads in one day, often of a political nature and certainly about particular candidates. Is it only spamming when they post negative pieces about YOUR candidate? Is this why this whole seperate forum for politics is being initiated, because one member posts multiple threads about a topic that YOU don't like.

That really stinks to high heaven. I'm beginning to think Kaydee is right when he talks about intolerance on the left.

I think that hyperbole can mislead people sometimes.

[Nagishkaw 510]

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life and stop rushing out to defend the said person everytime someone responds to his offensive comments.

Thank you for the kind words. I would have replied to the wild accusations of certain members, but I was (amazingly enough) at work. I'm perfectly capable of fighting my own battles, and I knew nothing about any of this ridiculous, stupid ####### until just now. I don't remember having any temper tantrums.... I remember being pretty pissed off for a while, but there weren't any tantrums. Impulse control problems? Possibly. Offensive comments? What offensive comments? Oh! You mean when I called you out on your spamming of the board with anti-Obama topics.... I believe it was 10 in one day. NOW you know WHY we are having a discussion about creating a new subforum for political topics. Yep....you're the #1 offender. You voted "No" for the subforum that YOU are responsible for. You've denied your own child. How thoughtful.

As for Marc.... I don't know which is more amusing. That MARC is calling me out for posting something that he mistakenly believes is against the TOS, or that his "outrage" is probably the closest thing to compassion that anyone will ever have for Ann Coulter.

Odd.

You know whats amusing. Wishing the DEATH of someone here or there and then justifying it away has if you didnt mean it. What you said shows where your heart is! I'm just recognizing it for what it is. You hiding from it leads us to how your thinking process works. Your just like me, only you wear a disguise. Trick or treat sir.

We are getting very close to the heart of some of you. The under current of hate is obvious from the ppl who profess love and caring.

I beleive the HYPOCRACY I have mentioned in the past is showing and has been illustrated here quite nicely.

What hypocrisy? I've made it very clear that I hate most people. I've NEVER tried to be "loving and caring". Nor am I trying to "disguise" anything. I said I wish Ann Coulter would hurry up and croak. I sincerely mean that. There, I've posted it twice. NOW will you stop your incessant drunken whining? You're coming across as a bit of a stalker who has fixated on something completely unimportant. Do you think Ann Coulter would give a flying sh!t about what I think of her? Doubtful.

[Dr. A ♥ O 203]

Obama's Dimestore 'Mein Kampf'

by Ann Coulter

Posted 04/02/2008 ET

Updated 04/09/2008 ET

If characters from "The Hills" were to emote about race, I imagine it would sound like B. Hussein Obama's autobiography, "Dreams From My Father."

Has anybody read this book? Inasmuch as the book reveals Obama to be a flabbergasting lunatic, I gather the answer is no. Obama is about to be our next president: You might want to take a peek. If only people had read "Mein Kampf" ... (lame. presuming he's already won the election and then comparing him to hitler.)

Nearly every page -- save the ones dedicated to cataloguing the mundane details of his life -- is bristling with anger at some imputed racist incident. The last time I heard this much race-baiting invective I was ... in my usual front-row pew, as I am every Sunday morning, at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. (this explains a lot about her perspective.)

Obama tells a story about taking two white friends from the high school basketball team to a "black party." Despite their deep-seated, unconscious hatred of blacks, the friends readily accepted. At the party, they managed not to scream the N-word, but instead "made some small talk, took a couple of the girls out on the dance floor."

But with his racial hair-trigger, Obama sensed the whites were not comfortable because "they kept smiling a lot." And then, in an incident reminiscent of the darkest days of the Jim Crow South ... they asked to leave after spending only about an hour at the party! It was practically an etiquette lynching!

So either they hated black people with the hot, hot hate of a thousand suns, or they were athletes who had come to a party late, after a Saturday night basketball game. (or maybe as a half black half white he's trying to find his place through his race. Many of my milatto friends growing up describe the same feelings.)

In the car on the way home, one of the friends empathizes with Obama, saying: "You know, man, that really taught me something. I mean, I can see how it must be tough for you and Ray sometimes, at school parties ... being the only black guys and all."

And thus Obama felt the cruel lash of racism! He actually writes that his response to his friend's perfectly lovely remark was: "A part of me wanted to punch him right there."

Listen, I don't want anybody telling Obama about Bill Clinton's "I feel your pain" line.

Wanting to punch his white friend in the stomach was the introductory anecdote to a full-page psychotic rant about living by "the white man's rules." (One rule he missed was: "Never punch out your empathetic white friend after dragging him to a crappy all-black party.") (He was a kid. Sheesh. Who doesn't have youthful angst lady!?)

Obama's gaseous disquisition on the "white man's rules" leads to this charming crescendo: "Should you refuse this defeat and lash out at your captors, they would have a name for that, too, a name that could cage you just as good. Paranoid. Militant. Violent. ***."

For those of you in the "When is Obama gonna play the 'N-word' card?" pool, the winner is ... Page 85! Congratulations!

When his mother expresses concern about Obama's high school friend being busted for drugs, Obama says he patted his mother's hand and told her not to worry.

This, too, prompted Obama to share with his readers a life lesson on how to handle white people: "It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned: People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves. They were more than satisfied, they were relieved -- such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry all the time."

First of all, I note that this technique seems to be the basis of Obama's entire presidential campaign. But moreover -- he was talking about his own mother! As Obama says: "Any distinction between good and bad whites held negligible meaning." Say, do you think a white person who said that about blacks would be a leading presidential candidate? (This reminds me of an "All in the Family Episode" called "Meet The Bunkers")

The man is stark bonkersville.

He says the reason black people keep to themselves is that it's "easier than spending all your time mad or trying to guess whatever it was that white folks were thinking about you."

Here's a little inside scoop about white people: We're not thinking about you. Especially WASPs. We think everybody is inferior, and we are perfectly charming about it.

In college, Obama explains to a girl why he was reading Joseph Conrad's 1902 classic, "Heart of Darkness": "I read the book to help me understand just what it is that makes white people so afraid. Their demons. The way ideas get twisted around. I helps me understand how people learn to hate."

By contrast, Malcolm X's autobiography "spoke" to Obama. One line in particular "stayed with me," he says. "He spoke of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be expunged."

Forget Rev. Jeremiah Wright -- Wright is Booker T. Washington compared to this guy. (These last claims are disturbing and has me going to check the book out at the library to judge for myself.)

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25831&s=rcmp

Edited April 11, 2008 by Olivia*

[metta 0]

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life and stop rushing out to defend the said person everytime someone responds to his offensive comments.

Thank you for the kind words. I would have replied to the wild accusations of certain members, but I was (amazingly enough) at work. I'm perfectly capable of fighting my own battles, and I knew nothing about any of this ridiculous, stupid ####### until just now. I don't remember having any temper tantrums.... I remember being pretty pissed off for a while, but there weren't any tantrums. Impulse control problems? Possibly. Offensive comments? What offensive comments? Oh! You mean when I called you out on your spamming of the board with anti-Obama topics.... I believe it was 10 in one day. NOW you know WHY we are having a discussion about creating a new subforum for political topics. Yep....you're the #1 offender. You voted "No" for the subforum that YOU are responsible for. You've denied your own child. How thoughtful.

As for Marc.... I don't know which is more amusing. That MARC is calling me out for posting something that he mistakenly believes is against the TOS, or that his "outrage" is probably the closest thing to compassion that anyone will ever have for Ann Coulter.

Odd.

[Jenn! 918]

You mean when I called you out on your spamming of the board with anti-Obama topics.... I believe it was 10 in one day. NOW you know WHY we are having a discussion about creating a new subforum for political topics. Yep....you're the #1 offender. You voted "No" for the subforum that YOU are responsible for. You've denied your own child. How thoughtful.

You are kidding me, right? If I look at metta's post history I see 5 topics posted in one day, not 10.

Other members start more threads in one day, often of a political nature and certainly about particular candidates. Is it only spamming when they post negative pieces about YOUR candidate? Is this why this whole seperate forum for politics is being initiated, because one member posts multiple threads about a topic that YOU don't like.

That really stinks to high heaven. I'm beginning to think Kaydee is right when he talks about intolerance on the left.

And spamming would be any member who posts multiple topics in quick succession about *any* candidate, or topic for that matter.

[PlatyPius 5]

You mean when I called you out on your spamming of the board with anti-Obama topics.... I believe it was 10 in one day. NOW you know WHY we are having a discussion about creating a new subforum for political topics. Yep....you're the #1 offender. You voted "No" for the subforum that YOU are responsible for. You've denied your own child. How thoughtful.

You are kidding me, right? If I look at metta's post history I see 5 topics posted in one day, not 10.

Other members start more threads in one day, often of a political nature and certainly about particular candidates. Is it only spamming when they post negative pieces about YOUR candidate? Is this why this whole seperate forum for politics is being initiated, because one member posts multiple threads about a topic that YOU don't like.

That really stinks to high heaven. I'm beginning to think Kaydee is right when he talks about intolerance on the left.

And spamming would be any member who posts multiple topics in quick succession about *any* candidate, or topic for that matter.

Which I've also mentioned. I don't care who the candidate is.... Posting 5,6,7 10 or 15 topics of ####### about ANY candidate is way uncool.

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life and stop rushing out to defend the said person everytime someone responds to his offensive comments.

Thank you for the kind words. I would have replied to the wild accusations of certain members, but I was (amazingly enough) at work. I'm perfectly capable of fighting my own battles, and I knew nothing about any of this ridiculous, stupid ####### until just now. I don't remember having any temper tantrums.... I remember being pretty pissed off for a while, but there weren't any tantrums. Impulse control problems? Possibly. Offensive comments? What offensive comments? Oh! You mean when I called you out on your spamming of the board with anti-Obama topics.... I believe it was 10 in one day. NOW you know WHY we are having a discussion about creating a new subforum for political topics. Yep....you're the #1 offender. You voted "No" for the subforum that YOU are responsible for. You've denied your own child. How thoughtful.

As for Marc.... I don't know which is more amusing. That MARC is calling me out for posting something that he mistakenly believes is against the TOS, or that his "outrage" is probably the closest thing to compassion that anyone will ever have for Ann Coulter.

Odd.

You know whats amusing. Wishing the DEATH of someone here or there and then justifying it away has if you didnt mean it. What you said shows where your heart is! I'm just recognizing it for what it is. You hiding from it leads us to how your thinking process works. Your just like me, only you wear a disguise. Trick or treat sir.

We are getting very close to the heart of some of you. The under current of hate is obvious from the ppl who profess love and caring.

I beleive the HYPOCRACY I have mentioned in the past is showing and has been illustrated here quite nicely.

What hypocrisy? I've made it very clear that I hate most people. I've NEVER tried to be "loving and caring". Nor am I trying to "disguise" anything. I said I wish Ann Coulter would hurry up and croak. I sincerely mean that. There, I've posted it twice. NOW will you stop your incessant drunken whining? You're coming across as a bit of a stalker who has fixated on something completely unimportant. Do you think Ann Coulter would give a flying sh!t about what I think of her? Doubtful.

Yeah, cuz I'm a stalker, aren't I? I make up fanciful stories and convince a few people of those stories so that they'll be my "posting buddies" on VJ and support my insane delusions.....

[metta 0]

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life and stop rushing out to defend the said person everytime someone responds to his offensive comments.

Thank you for the kind words. I would have replied to the wild accusations of certain members, but I was (amazingly enough) at work. I'm perfectly capable of fighting my own battles, and I knew nothing about any of this ridiculous, stupid ####### until just now. I don't remember having any temper tantrums.... I remember being pretty pissed off for a while, but there weren't any tantrums. Impulse control problems? Possibly. Offensive comments? What offensive comments? Oh! You mean when I called you out on your spamming of the board with anti-Obama topics.... I believe it was 10 in one day. NOW you know WHY we are having a discussion about creating a new subforum for political topics. Yep....you're the #1 offender. You voted "No" for the subforum that YOU are responsible for. You've denied your own child. How thoughtful.

As for Marc.... I don't know which is more amusing. That MARC is calling me out for posting something that he mistakenly believes is against the TOS, or that his "outrage" is probably the closest thing to compassion that anyone will ever have for Ann Coulter.

Odd.

You may have noticed that in strict adherence to the TOS, I did not name names

I was mindful of the fact that people often tend to throw TOS at posters whose POVs they can't stomach( comment: possible, development problem) But now that you have kindly claimed yourself to be that person i shall go ahead and make my case on that basis.

I had a possible TOS violation charge thrown at me by you on April 5, memorably a Sunday when I (uncharacteristically)posted perhaps 5. I went back and looked at the posts on that date and I could find only 3 or 4. BTW, my topic for whcih you threw that "bordering TOS violation" and "spamming" charge at me is missing, the last time I checked. The same day, there are others who posted more than 5 and yet I saw no complaint of them coming from you.

I have been on this board almost since the beginning but post very seldom and my average post per day is .66

So one day out of now 4 years? I posted 5 and you now have me villified as an "offender" - a TOS violation - by my count.

To continue the story, the next day, a little bird brought me an edict from above suggesting me that I do only one or two a day.

If you look at the whole incident this is how it went...

I posted (5) Obama-related topics one day that got one person -you roiled up. You then charged me with an act bordering on spamming (TOS violation).

Consequently, a debate on forming subgroups was initiated by you with those close to you (correct me if I'm wrong). And now thanks to you , I learn that I am the target of this kerfuffle or shall we say "temper tantrum."

Then came the "gentle persuasion" to limit my post to 1-2 per day( muscling in B) )

As to offensive comment, it is self explanatory. Unless you are looking at it from a totally self-centered perspective, wishing death or ill-will upon any public figure will offend those who hold a favorable view of that public figure. I've seen this kind of comments thrown at people you dislike AC, HC to name a few) quite off-handedly in public.

To me, that displays impulse conrol problem.

Edited April 11, 2008 by metta

[PlatyPius 5]

Running away from a very hateful remark and turning it into a joke. Now thats truly telling. The back scratching here is very ugly I hope you all can see it.

Marc, a remark towards Ann Coulter who isn't, I assure you, a member here and a remark against, for example, Steven is very different. You yourself are responsible for many disparaging and hateful remarks towards MEMBERS here.

That's the difference in this case. But I guess it's easy to assume that the mods are scratching the back of certain members here, it makes good reading and let's face it, we're easy targets.

I fully expect many of these -------> emoticons to follow this remark. Go for it, one and all.

I honestly don't see or assume that mods are scratching the back of certain memebrs here.

But I do see one mod mothering an SO who IS a VJ memebr with impulse control problem and temper tantrums. It's time to let the man-child fight his own battles in life and stop rushing out to defend the said person everytime someone responds to his offensive comments.

Thank you for the kind words. I would have replied to the wild accusations of certain members, but I was (amazingly enough) at work. I'm perfectly capable of fighting my own battles, and I knew nothing about any of this ridiculous, stupid ####### until just now. I don't remember having any temper tantrums.... I remember being pretty pissed off for a while, but there weren't any tantrums. Impulse control problems? Possibly. Offensive comments? What offensive comments? Oh! You mean when I called you out on your spamming of the board with anti-Obama topics.... I believe it was 10 in one day. NOW you know WHY we are having a discussion about creating a new subforum for political topics. Yep....you're the #1 offender. You voted "No" for the subforum that YOU are responsible for. You've denied your own child. How thoughtful.

As for Marc.... I don't know which is more amusing. That MARC is calling me out for posting something that he mistakenly believes is against the TOS, or that his "outrage" is probably the closest thing to compassion that anyone will ever have for Ann Coulter.

Odd.

You may have noticed that in strict adherence to the TOS, I did not name names

I was mindful of the fact that people often tend to throw TOS at posters whose POVs they can't stomach( comment: possible, development problem) But now that you have kindly claimed yourself to be that person i shall go ahead and make my case on that basis.

I had a possible TOS violation charge thrown at me by you on April 5, memorably a Sunday when I (uncharacteristically)posted perhaps 5. I went back and looked at the posts on that date and I could find only 3 or 4. BTW, my topic for whcih you threw that "bordering TOS violation" and "spamming" charge at me is missing, the last time I checked. The same day, there are others who posted more than 5 and yet I saw no complaint of them coming from you.

I have been on this board almost since the beginning but post very seldom and my average post per day is .66

So one day out of now 4 years? I posted 5 and you now have me villified as an "offender" - a TOS violation - by my count.

To continue the story, the next day, a little bird brought me an edict from above suggesting me that I do only one or two a day.

If you look at the whole incident this is how it went...

I posted (5) Obama-related topics one day that got one person -you roiled up. You then charged me with an act bordering on spamming (TOS violation).

Consequently, a debate on forming subgroups was initiated by you with those close to you (correct me if I'm wrong). And now thanks to you , I learn that I am the target of this kerfuffle or shall we say "temper tantrum."

Then came the "gentle persuasion" to limit my post to 1-2 per day( muscling in B) )

As to offensive comment, it is self explanatory. Unless you are looking at it from a totally self-centered perspective, wishing death or ill-will upon any public figure will offend those who hold a favorable view of that public figure. I've seen this kind of comments thrown at people you dislike AC, HC to name a few) quite off-handedly in public.

To me, that displays impulse conrol problem.

Actually, no. You're wrong on most of it.

I didn't initiate the subforum thing. That was some other disgusted individual.

And no, I had nothing to do with any of the other stuff either. I reported you to Ewok for spamming. ONLY Ewok. Any actions that were taken after that point were his decision.