Reynal2m

Try the White House one, is simple and easy:

We totally understand how you feel—we’re in the same boat. We’ve been waiting 16 months, and it’s painful to see others who filed the same day, (even earlier), already get approved. What makes it even harder is knowing there’s a backlog at our embassy, with interview wait times over a year. So even if USCIS finally approves us, we’re still looking at more than a year before we can even try to reunite in the U.S. After reviewing various recommendations online, I wanted to share a few strategies that have reportedly helped others in similar situations: Contact a Tier 2 USCIS officer – This can sometimes provide more detailed information or trigger movement on your case. Upload unsolicited evidence – Refile or submit Form I-129F (K-3 visa) – Reach out to your Senator and House Representative – Especially if you submitted a K-3 inquiry (this typically helps with the K-3, not the I-130 as they will say it's under normal timeframe). Write to the White House – Yes, really. Surprisingly, some people have received responses or seen progress after doing this. Send a letter to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – Another way to raise awareness of your case at a higher level. File a CIS Ombudsman case assistance request – Helpful when your case is outside normal processing times and USCIS isn’t responding. As a last resort: File a writ of mandamus – This is a federal lawsuit to compel USCIS to make a decision when they’ve unreasonably delayed action. We wish you the best of luck and hope you receive an update from USCIS very soon. Warm regards, Reynaldo and Renzo

Best advice: I was denied a Spain visa back in 2021, so I decided to focus on traveling to other countries instead. I visited Colombia three times (had a blast!), went to Panama twice, and also traveled to Turkey and the UAE. When I finally reapplied for a Schengen visa, the officer at the interview noticed my travel history, commented that I travel a lot, and said she liked my profile—she approved my visa on the spot. Since then, I’ve successfully obtained two Schengen visas. Japan sounds very fun...

Put your question into ChatGPT and got a detailed explanation: Yes — that notation on your visa/green card refers to a medical classification and public health review requirement at your port of entry (POE) into the U.S. Let’s break it down: 🟡 “Class B” Medical Condition This refers to a medical condition that is not inadmissible, but still requires attention or monitoring. Class A: Serious medical conditions that could make someone inadmissible without a waiver. Class B: Less serious — does not prevent immigration, but requires follow-up after entry. 🟡 "req attn of USPHS at POE" USPHS = U.S. Public Health Service POE = Port of Entry This means that when you arrive in the U.S., Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers may refer you to a CDC (Centers for Disease Control) or USPHS medical unit at the airport or border crossing for further evaluation or instructions related to your medical condition. 🟡 212(g)(2)(B) This is a reference to Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 212(g)(2)(B). It allows individuals with certain communicable diseases or health conditions to be admitted to the U.S. under conditions, such as reporting to U.S. health authorities. 🔍 Most Common Scenario This notation is commonly used for applicants who: Tested positive for TB (tuberculosis) screening but were not infectious Had Class B1 TB, meaning inactive TB, or old scarring from past TB Had other chronic conditions that aren’t grounds for denial but require follow-up ✅ What You Should Do At your POE, CBP may refer you to a CDC officer. You might receive instructions or a packet to give to a local health department. You may be required to attend a free follow-up medical appointment within 30 days of entry. 🟢 Important: This Does Not Affect Your Immigration Status You can still enter the U.S. and activate your green card. The note is only a health follow-up requirement, not a denial or restriction.

Wouldn't they get mad if you remind them?

March 26, 2024 here. We got an email on June 12, 2025 saying "Action was taken". We found out through Emma that our case was moved to Texas SC. We know our case is delayed because they are working with April 2024.

When you apply online for a Utah marriage license, the license has to reflect your current legal name exactly as it appears on your government-issued ID. The system pulls that information directly from the ID you provide, and there's no option to enter a new married name during the application process. Also, Utah marriage documents don’t include any section for selecting or declaring a new last name. However, once your marriage is recorded and you receive the certified marriage certificate, you can use it to update your last name with places like the Social Security Administration (SSA), the Utah DMV, your passport, banks, employers, and so on.

Ok, thanks for clarifying

This is from a USCIS fraud indicator sheet I found online... See also others:

Agreed, it's great that you highlighted the benefits of both options.

We chose the Utah online marriage route because same-sex marriage isn’t legally recognized in the Dominican Republic. After the ceremony, we made sure to reunite in person for our honeymoon at a resort in Punta Cana. One important note: it's best not to submit the I-130 immediately after the wedding, as doing so can raise red flags for potential fraud.

1. Utah Online Marriage & CR1 Visa Yes, a Utah online marriage can be recognized for a CR1 visa, but there's a very important catch: 👉 USCIS requires that the couple physically reunite and consummate the marriage after the online ceremony for the marriage to be considered valid under immigration law. If you file the I-130 before physically being together after the wedding, the petition is likely to be denied. 2. CR1 Processing Time (Vietnam) Current CR1 visa processing times, according to USCIS and community experience, are around 17+ months (sometimes longer). So if you’re planning to bring her to the U.S. by mid-2026, the CR1 timeline may be tight — especially if you can’t reunite shortly after the Utah ceremony. 3. Proof of Relationship (Photos, etc.) Even a small number of photos can work as long as they clearly show your relationship history — ideally: At least one in-person photo together Screenshots of video calls/chats Travel receipts or gifts exchanged Letters, emails, or messages More is always better, but you don’t need a full album. 4. Shared Property / Joint Accounts These are not required, but helpful if available. For couples who are long-distance or haven't yet lived together, USCIS understands that some typical "marital" evidence may not exist — focus instead on consistent communication and any visits. 5. Important Things to Prepare Evidence of your post-wedding reunion (flight plans, passport stamps, photos). Keep a record of your communication (screenshots, call logs). Any documents showing plans to live together (letters, lease prep, etc.) 6. Military Expedite Yes, being active-duty can help. USCIS may expedite I-130 petitions for active military members under certain conditions, such as: Deployment schedule conflicts Urgent family reunification You’ll likely need a letter from your commanding officer explaining the request. ⚠️ Final Suggestion: If your goal is to bring her to the U.S. sooner, a K-1 fiancée visa may be a better option. It typically takes 9–12 months, and doesn’t require you to marry first — just show you met in person within 2 years.

They just informed us that the case was moved from California to Texas.

Thanks! This is so relieving

Thank you! The case is still not under active review and remains in the 'Received' status. We're hoping to hear something from USCIS soon