Timona

@sean126 apologies. I got things confused.

@sean126 how many citizenship tests has she taken? 2010 and recently? She been here close to 18 years and no grasp of English?

There's nothing a lawyer is going to do. She has to pass the test. A lawyer won't help her skip it

How'd he get his US citizenship?

Welcome to the world of @Boiler. He's short and direct. With time, you'll understand him within first reading. As of now, you may have to read 10 times and scratch your head a little. But he's knowledgeable. So worth the reading.

Higher chance it's this. Mostly when they don't say, it's Nigeria. Say it louder @Redro. If Redro is pissed, you must have REALLY burnt your candle.

What @Boiler is saying is that there's no chance of them getting B-2. This is what I also wanted to say when I asked you if you're familiar with "Bogota and B-2s" Colombians are notorious for overstaying in US. As of today, Mexico has put a strict measure on them because they're now using Mexico as a catapult to get into US via border and claim frivolous asylum. A lot of them are being denied/ being deported as soon as they land in Mexico. There was such a post here a month ago.

I know. But you're battling something you have no control of. Just take whatever they give you and call it a day. You have to leave. So, take what you can get.

File re-entry NOW. Leave after biometrics, not before.

Are you in US or abroad?

I am confused. On another note, I'm not sure if you're familiar with US Embassy Bogota and their B-2 process. But I'll reserve that sicne it's not what you asked.

I really dislike it when people come on board and say "I'm from Latin America/ Africa." The only time they're proud to mention a country is when it's USA. Even if you mention the city, noone here in US is going to find you. Not sure why a date was written for the future. Something fishy going on here, hence the need to tell us AFRICA. I'm with @Redro. Lemme not say what I wanna say because I'll get a moderation and ban.

3

Is your child in or outside US? How old? I guess your child is outside US.

Seems th game here was for the sister to use adoption to get to US but that ship sank before she made it ashore. Now, there's a U-turn and sibling wants to sponsor sibling.. This adoption game is well known in the Philippines. Answer is NO.

If you're on good terms with hubby, time to sign I-407 and restart process. Your current GC is dead. It'll be caught. Better fix it right now. There was a poster here a while back who got ROC without interview, and during that time, she'd divorced (I think she was waiting to got to interview and present divorce papers but got approved without interview and just sat on the divorce papers). Anyway, she applied for N400, got caught and was thrown back to go fix her ROC.

I know this. Was just wondering why someone would not favor getting information direct from the source like you just mentioned but go the 3rd party route.

Good. I didn't know . Thanks

Giving data to third parties isn't something I'd recommend.

And probably even this robbery was staged. And how do we know the robbery people were USC? And was it fatal to warrant star witness protection?? As in investigating officer, if someone walked to my desk and asked me "Can I get U-visa because I witnessed a crime?" I'd first ask, "How'd you know about U-visa?" And did this affect you in any way? How'd you even know if those involved are USCs?" Basically, for someone to ask tou this, they know more about the robbery. Planned.

I would think revocation of any benefit by anyone linked to him eg the gas station clerk whom he had "robbed" earlier on, at a different location. They weren't coperating to get the hitman arrested. The hitman was helping them get "evidence" for GC. If it was to get arrested, police would be nearby, in unmarked cars. Swoop before all that happened

I get you now, Our Dear Librarian. Many reasons for NO. Just to mention a few: 1. They planned it. Had they not, this would not have happened. 2. They're now in problems because their actions led to a guy getting killed. 3. Even if they file with USCIS, it'll be denied because this is FRAUD. They had planned to deceive USCIS. 4. Their lives aren't in danger. 5. They cannot be of importance to the state/ their "witnessing" because it was all caught on camera. Basically, they're not "star witness."

They were using gas station because they wanted it to be caught on camera and beacsue they deemed it safer for their movie.

Staged robbery was going on at one of the gas pumps. At that time, there was a dude in a red car parked at the entrance of the gas station, front of car facing the entrance to the gas stations store. The dude saw the "robbery." He got out and shot the robber. The robber died on scene. Later on, police found evidence from the robber's phone with the guy that hired him (the guy approached by the immigrants). Texts suggested the two (hit-man and the employer) had done this a couple of times because the hit-man said "Oooo just the usual gas station "robbery."" The dude who pulled his gun and shot the hit-man isn't facing charges because he did the right thing: He saw an armed robbery and reacted. It was later, after the texts where found, that it became apparent that this was a U-visa scabecause the planners even mentioned the word "U-visa in the texts."

This was a different story that I was telling. I read it on Reddit. The OP saw a robbery happen then went on Reddit to ask if that qualifies her for U visa. This is totally unrelated to today's post.